In my view, what we can see of a so called verdict of history (a Whig interpretation) is a turning radically against the white man, against the Whig himself, and his whole Western Civilization and its history.
It is a verdict which he himself, the Whig historian, fully embraces, and one which he has wilfully brought on himself, really, over a very long period of time now, certainly since at least the 17th Century.
"Now unfortunately, for at least three decades, university humanities have been teaching that the history of mankind is the history of the oppression, by white males, of everyone else." DK
But isn't this, this humanities teaching, for at least three decades now, after all, merely a small part of the final fruit of the Whig interpretation itself? Isn't what they have been teaching in fact merely the final playing out of the Whig interpretation of history itself?
"Now unfortunately, for at least three decades, university humanities have been teaching that the history of mankind is the history of the oppression, by white males, of everyone else." DK
But isn't this, this humanities teaching, for at least three decades now, after all, merely a small part of the final fruit of the Whig interpretation itself? Isn't what they have been teaching in fact merely the final playing out of the Whig interpretation of history itself?
No comments:
Post a Comment