BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Sunday, June 30, 2019
THEY SAID PUT IT ON THE BLOG SO HERE IT IS: DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/07/quincy-jones-the-beatles-were-the-worst-musicians-in-the-world
Quincy Jones on The Beatles.
Re Ringo:
I remember listening to the Beatles, as a young kid. In a year or so, after Dylan, and a lot of other good groups, Kinks, Animals, Who, Byrds, Airplane, Stones, even Paul Revere, etc etc, the Beatles sounded like baby poop.
This is for Boop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awBy_K30Pe8&list=RDEQoai_5iF1k&index=28
Quincy Jones on The Beatles.
Re Ringo:
“Ronnie came in for 15 minutes and tore it up. Ringo comes back and says: ‘George [Martin], can you play it back for me one more time?’
“So George did, and Ringo says: ‘That didn’t sound so bad.’ And I said: ‘Yeah, motherfucker because it ain’t you.’ Great guy, though.”
One might have found better musicians among the students at Eton, much less an average conservatory, anywhere.
Their songs queered every stylistic tradition they touched, or tried to fuse together.
I remember listening to the Beatles, as a young kid. In a year or so, after Dylan, and a lot of other good groups, Kinks, Animals, Who, Byrds, Airplane, Stones, even Paul Revere, etc etc, the Beatles sounded like baby poop.
This is for Boop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awBy_K30Pe8&list=RDEQoai_5iF1k&index=28
CHINA IS MOVING QUICKLY TO TAKE OVER BOTH AFRICA AND EUROPE.RUSSIA WILL BE SURROUNDED COMPLETELY
BRI
WHAT WILL THEIR ALLIANCE WITH CHINA BE WORTH THEN?
WHAT WILL THEIR ALLIANCE WITH CHINA BE WORTH THEN?
TLF WHY TALK CLIMATE WHEN YOUR GLOBALIZATION RUINED WHOLE ENVIRONMENT ANYWAY?
The Dots Show:
You, Thomas L Friedman, are one of the ones who have been, and are still, not winning, not strategic, not patriotic, and foolish, destructive, and cynical.
The heighth of cynicism for Mr Globalization himself to claim to be winning, strategic, or, especially, patriotic.
At least fricking Michael Pillsbury, another erstwhile globalization Asia pander pundit, finally, in his last ditch, came clean.
Pillsbury at last has awakened to his senses, the senses of a dumb but alert animal, in the jungle at night, who now finally knows that he has been stalked for a long time.
You, Thomas L Friedman, are one of the ones who have been, and are still, not winning, not strategic, not patriotic, and foolish, destructive, and cynical.
The heighth of cynicism for Mr Globalization himself to claim to be winning, strategic, or, especially, patriotic.
At least fricking Michael Pillsbury, another erstwhile globalization Asia pander pundit, finally, in his last ditch, came clean.
Pillsbury at last has awakened to his senses, the senses of a dumb but alert animal, in the jungle at night, who now finally knows that he has been stalked for a long time.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
SEE DK'S CURRENT POST AND COMMENTS
I may have made myself misunderstood by Mr Glover and others.
See this article and especially the quote below:
www.nps.gov/resources/story.htm?id=251
The Southern lag in industrial development did not result from any inherent economic disadvantages. There was great wealth in the South, but it was primarily tied up in the slave economy. In 1860, the economic value of slaves in the United States exceeded the invested value of all of the nation's railroads, factories, and banks combined. On the eve of the Civil War, cotton prices were at an all-time high. The Confederate leaders were confident that the importance of cotton on the world market, particularly in England and France, would provide the South with the diplomatic and military assistance they needed for victory.
Saturday, June 29, 2019
THE MISSFORNIANS (BEVERLY HILLBILLIES) DIALOGUE
Whas that owt thar in th yard by th paowl?
Thasu peafow.
Whi yu got tha waird thang owt thair?
Dadie browt him furm Missippi.
Yow dadie sum kindu wirdo?
Yu cun say that.
Thisu reel gud place fur im than!
Ainnobudie straet n LA!
I hird he got behine Buttiegy!
Yup!
Dedicated to the memory of Mario Savio.
I hird he got behine Buttiegy!
Yup!
Dedicated to the memory of Mario Savio.
MY ADVICE FOR WHO WANTS TO BE LESS RACIST MOVE TO HAWAII!
NYT: Great stuff. Jam them in out there!
Offshoring the less racist!
This could be a win win, for globalist economists already offshored there!
Kamala Harris and Buttyguy, match made in heaven, can join them out there after they lose.
Offshoring the less racist!
This could be a win win, for globalist economists already offshored there!
Kamala Harris and Buttyguy, match made in heaven, can join them out there after they lose.
NUCLEAR POWER WILL INCREASINGLY BE PAINTED AS A GREENER WAY TO GO
Ultimately, there may be few good alternatives.
Clean nuclear is the only hopeful direction, given ridiculous rogue environmentalist population and prosperity demands.
Wind and solar themselves are faux renewable if overdone, as we are bound to do. They themselves also rely on not fully renewable inputs.
THE PIVOT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY GREEN ENERGY THOMAS L FRIEDMAN ROGUE ENVIRONMENTALIST
This is touted as so environmentally friendly and necessary, and in a sense it is.
But let's think about some of the underlying conditions and motivations shifting societies and industries in these directions.
What are they?
Are the Chinese such great humanistic environmentalistic Aquarians?
Good global citizenship?
Sustainability?
Who wants to sustain whom for what?
Isn't sustainability, after all, part of an endgame race to the bottom, a survival of the most sustainable, a Darwinian environmentalism?
And who wants to keep human populations at these high levels, or even higher ones, by so called Rogue Environmentalism?
It is the sort of trend that ultimately gives environmentalism itself a bad name.
We are installing solar panels for the same reasons most people do, it has become cost effective, and to not keep getting screwed by power companies, and because we are some of the few groups of well to do people on the planet who can afford it.
Religion? For many zealots, it is that.
But let's think about some of the underlying conditions and motivations shifting societies and industries in these directions.
What are they?
Are the Chinese such great humanistic environmentalistic Aquarians?
Good global citizenship?
Sustainability?
Who wants to sustain whom for what?
Isn't sustainability, after all, part of an endgame race to the bottom, a survival of the most sustainable, a Darwinian environmentalism?
And who wants to keep human populations at these high levels, or even higher ones, by so called Rogue Environmentalism?
It is the sort of trend that ultimately gives environmentalism itself a bad name.
We are installing solar panels for the same reasons most people do, it has become cost effective, and to not keep getting screwed by power companies, and because we are some of the few groups of well to do people on the planet who can afford it.
Religion? For many zealots, it is that.
THOMAS L FRIEDMAN WANKING HIS OWN GLOBALIZATION DOTS
He is starting out by giving you a linear model of an argument.
Dot one is a faux dot.
Dot 2, is actually dot one continued. The dots are not an argument.
They do not follow each other for any reason whatever.
It is logical pointalism.
Most of his readers of the NYT, furthermore, don't even notice this fact, and really are the kind of people who follow their noses through an article like this, so they don't wander off too far into their own musings of what sense his train of argument is making, before he gives them their next so called dot morsel to down. For them, the next dot comes just at the right time, and they use their sense of smell to confirm that it is the next morsel of his repast they should down now. It really is, for the average, NYT reader, a kind of smell test of where the next truffle of wisdom is.
Dot 3 disaster relief bill, is another non sequitor from anything to anything. Friedman is against this kind of regulation, but he hates Trump's deregulation.
Dot 4 another faux dot, automakers complaining about lost profits and instability from deregulation, not climate change per se at all, very ironical to say the least, given the stance of both liberal and conservative laissez faire private enterprise here from the beginning.
Here's the big dot he leaves out: globalization, his globalization, resulted in climate change.
Nothing else.
And as DK says, now, nothing can stop it, and fools who do are fighting the course of Whig history.
And TLF knows it.
He's got Trump caught in his Tar Baby of Globalization.
Globalization has long been Friedman's Baby.
Anyone who touches it now gets stuck in it, regardless of which side you are on, unless you're Friedman, who can manoeuvre through and around it without showing a drop of tar.
He can spend a whole article yanking global warming logic to and fro without ever mentioning globalization as its cause.
Friedman's article is a Pig's Breakfast of nonsense.
Dot one is a faux dot.
Dot 2, is actually dot one continued. The dots are not an argument.
They do not follow each other for any reason whatever.
It is logical pointalism.
Most of his readers of the NYT, furthermore, don't even notice this fact, and really are the kind of people who follow their noses through an article like this, so they don't wander off too far into their own musings of what sense his train of argument is making, before he gives them their next so called dot morsel to down. For them, the next dot comes just at the right time, and they use their sense of smell to confirm that it is the next morsel of his repast they should down now. It really is, for the average, NYT reader, a kind of smell test of where the next truffle of wisdom is.
Dot 3 disaster relief bill, is another non sequitor from anything to anything. Friedman is against this kind of regulation, but he hates Trump's deregulation.
Dot 4 another faux dot, automakers complaining about lost profits and instability from deregulation, not climate change per se at all, very ironical to say the least, given the stance of both liberal and conservative laissez faire private enterprise here from the beginning.
Here's the big dot he leaves out: globalization, his globalization, resulted in climate change.
Nothing else.
And as DK says, now, nothing can stop it, and fools who do are fighting the course of Whig history.
And TLF knows it.
He's got Trump caught in his Tar Baby of Globalization.
Globalization has long been Friedman's Baby.
Anyone who touches it now gets stuck in it, regardless of which side you are on, unless you're Friedman, who can manoeuvre through and around it without showing a drop of tar.
He can spend a whole article yanking global warming logic to and fro without ever mentioning globalization as its cause.
Friedman's article is a Pig's Breakfast of nonsense.
THE FIRST JAPANESE TEACHER AT ETON INSTRUCTED THE CLASS TO ANSWER YES TO HIM IN JAPANESE HAI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r75ajf6UEhU
See the video above at the 15 minute mark.
Rather analogous to how the Suzuki string method took over here, with disastrous consequences.
The Suzuki method queered Western music education and pedagoguy.
See the video above at the 15 minute mark.
Rather analogous to how the Suzuki string method took over here, with disastrous consequences.
The Suzuki method queered Western music education and pedagoguy.
THE BUTT UGLY CIVIL WAR HISTORY
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
RE IMMIGRATION HISTORY DK POST
"...For the new party, the spread of slavery, rather than the growth of immigration, was the main threat to free laborers in the North...." DK
The Republican Party was certainly founded on white Northern racism, and the issue of slavery alone.
Certainly Northern white racist fear mongering was what swept Lincoln into office and into the Civil War.
But this was always merely false political fear mongering, and everyone except the electorate, especially Lincoln, well knew it.
Douglas pointed it out clearly in the debates, but the Northern whites still ended up eventually electing Lincoln.
Here is DK, on Tocqueville, on Northern white racism prior to the time of the Civil War by decades:
DK ON TOCQUEVILLE NORTHERN WHITE RACISM CAUSE OF CIVIL WAR
' "...race prejudice seems stronger in those states that have abolished slavery than in those where it still exists, and nowhere is it more intolerant than in states where slavery was never known."(AT) Even in the northern states where black citizens theoretically enjoyed equal rights, he reported, they were too afraid to assert them. Those states that had abolished slavery had done so not to help the black man, but to help the white, both by leaving free labor without the competition of slaves and by eliminating the corrupting influence of owning slaves upon the whites.' DK, 2016
I will just add a footnote here, to this prior post passage reprinted above.
Those Northern states that had abolished slavery had done so not only not to help the black man, and to help the white, and not only by leaving free white labor without slave competition, and not only by eliminating the corrupting influence of owning slaves upon whites, but, much more importantly, they did not want negroes around, free or slave, in the North or anywhere else in America.
That is really what Tocqueville had meant in 1830, in the passage DK quoted.
The Northern cause in the Civil War was supposed, according to the electorate, to result in the transportation, not the immediate, or the gradual, assimilation of negroes, slave or free.
They got screwed in every way. The only good, temporary, thing, for them, was that the Radical Republican Party kept the freed negroes in puppet control of only the South, not the North.
I will just add a footnote here, to this prior post passage reprinted above.
Those Northern states that had abolished slavery had done so not only not to help the black man, and to help the white, and not only by leaving free white labor without slave competition, and not only by eliminating the corrupting influence of owning slaves upon whites, but, much more importantly, they did not want negroes around, free or slave, in the North or anywhere else in America.
That is really what Tocqueville had meant in 1830, in the passage DK quoted.
The Northern cause in the Civil War was supposed, according to the electorate, to result in the transportation, not the immediate, or the gradual, assimilation of negroes, slave or free.
They got screwed in every way. The only good, temporary, thing, for them, was that the Radical Republican Party kept the freed negroes in puppet control of only the South, not the North.
Friday, June 28, 2019
MONNET CIA BACKED
In 1951, the Treaty of Paris was signed, creating the European Coal and Steel Community(ECSC). This was an international community based on supranationalism and international law, designed to help the economy of Europe and prevent future war by integrating its members.
In the aim of creating a federal Europe two further communities were proposed: a European Defence Community and a European Political Community. While the treaty for the latter was being drawn up by the Common Assembly, the ECSC parliamentary chamber, the proposed defense community was rejected by the French Parliament. ECSC President Jean Monnet, a leading figure behind the communities, resigned from the High Authority in protest and began work on alternative communities, based on economic integration rather than political integration.
Monday, June 3, 2019
THE US ALONE CREATED AND THE CIA FUNDED THE FORMATION OF THE EU
Clark, p. 226, fn 37, re Monnet............
Combining the American colonies had made a lot more sense at the time, but was rejected by the colonists, in the 17th Century.
Fighting the course of history.
Combining the American colonies had made a lot more sense at the time, but was rejected by the colonists, in the 17th Century.
Fighting the course of history.
KAMALA WANTS TO TALK RACE MY FAVORITE TO DISCUSS IS THE YELLOW ONE
Negroes come second.
And it's not really American negroes I am interested in discussing.
That has become a dead letter.
Harris would award reparations from American taxpayers to both American negroes for slavery, and to Indians, especially Madrasans, for colonialism.....
She's half Hindu.
How many Hindus, entitled to Kamala's reparations, do you think there are?
Why not make Americans pay for Hindu health care in India, to follow Democratic logic?
I like Indian food, but that's about it!
And it's not really American negroes I am interested in discussing.
That has become a dead letter.
Harris would award reparations from American taxpayers to both American negroes for slavery, and to Indians, especially Madrasans, for colonialism.....
She's half Hindu.
How many Hindus, entitled to Kamala's reparations, do you think there are?
Why not make Americans pay for Hindu health care in India, to follow Democratic logic?
I like Indian food, but that's about it!
BIDEN IS NOW A WHITE BABY
Any person of color that touches his ass turns white!
Goes Uncle Tom!
Yo a Biden white nigra!
Noh Im not!
Dey kill albino nigras in Africa!
Goes Uncle Tom!
Yo a Biden white nigra!
Noh Im not!
Dey kill albino nigras in Africa!
KAMALA WHITEN BIDEN! REVERSE TAR BABY WHITE IS THE NEW BLACK
Biden got painted Snow White.
Marshmallow Baby!
Reverse Tar Baby!
Thay aint no s'mores!
You touch Biden, you get white all over your ass!
Marshmallow Baby!
Reverse Tar Baby!
Thay aint no s'mores!
You touch Biden, you get white all over your ass!
GLOBALIST FUSION BOWL DIALOGUE
No, don't give me no white meat!
We only got white meat.
You got any fish of color?
Plenty!
We only got white meat.
You got any fish of color?
Plenty!
AUDIENCE TODAY TECHNICOLOR GLOBALIZED MEDLEY THE MENU
Fill your fusion bowls!
'Add protein': the mystery meat!
Thursday, June 27, 2019
VIDEO THE GLOBAL TRAP
Here was a video from the 1995 Forum:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_OWyr0C-5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_OWyr0C-5s
RE KRUGMAN WANKISH ECONOMISTS RUNNING WARREN'S WONKISH PLANS
Krugman, wearing only his domestic economy beanie (He can keep his hat on.), preaching wonkishly mainly to his wanker liberal economist audience backing Warren.
A common misconception is that various economists, any of them really, are only wrong, if ever wrong, only sometimes, and about only one thing, here or there.
This is an important misconception:
Economists are always, and have always, normally, been wrong about everything in one way or in multiple ways at the same time.
HISTORY ENDED HAS BEEN REPLACED BY JOURNALISM
Thursday, June 27, 2019
MARIO SAVIO FUKUYAMA THE LATEST END OF HISTORY POST HEGELIANS WWII THEN 1989
"The same is true of all bureaucracies. They begin as tools, means to certain legitimate goals, and they end up feeding their own existence. The conception that bureaucrats have is that history has in fact come to an end. No events can occur now that the Second World War is over which can change American society substantially. We proceed by standard procedures as we are." MS
Pick one End of History: WWI 1919
Savio End of History: WWII 1945
Fukuyama End of History: Fall of USSR 1989
Pick one End of History: WWI 1919
Savio End of History: WWII 1945
Fukuyama End of History: Fall of USSR 1989
The reality is different:
THE 20TH CENTURY PIGS BREAKFAST
MARIO SAVIO FUKUYAMA THE LATEST END OF HISTORY POST HEGELIANS WWII THEN 1989
"The same is true of all bureaucracies. They begin as tools, means to certain legitimate goals, and they end up feeding their own existence. The conception that bureaucrats have is that history has in fact come to an end. No events can occur now that the Second World War is over which can change American society substantially. We proceed by standard procedures as we are." MS
Pick one End of History: WWI 1919
Savio End of History: WWII 1945
Fukuyama End of History: Fall of USSR 1989
Pick one End of History: WWI 1919
Savio End of History: WWII 1945
Fukuyama End of History: Fall of USSR 1989
The reality is different:
THE 20TH CENTURY PIGS BREAKFAST
BEST LEFT PEOPLE OF COLOR IN ROUSSEAU LOCKE JEFFERSON STATE OF NATURE
The Grand Inquisitor:
"'It is Thou! ... Thou!' ... Receiving no reply, he rapidly continues: 'Nay, answer not; be silent! ... And what couldst Thou say? ... I know but too well Thy answer.... Besides, Thou hast no right to add one syllable to that which was already uttered by Thee before.... Why shouldst Thou now return, to impede us in our work? For Thou hast come but for that only, and Thou knowest it well. But art Thou as well aware of what awaits Thee in the morning? I do not know, nor do I care to know who thou mayest be: be it Thou or only thine image, to-morrow I will condemn and burn Thee on the stake, as the most wicked of all the heretics; and that same people, who to-day were kissing Thy feet, to-morrow at one bend of my finger, will rush to add fuel to Thy funeral pile... Wert Thou aware of this?' he adds, speaking as if in solemn thought, and never for one instant taking his piercing glance off the meek Face before him.".... "I can hardly realize the situation described--what is all this, Ivan?" suddenly interrupted Alyosha, who had remained silently listening to his brother. "Is this an extravagant fancy, or some mistake of the old man, an impossible quid pro quo?" "Let it be the latter, if you like," laughed Ivan, "since modern realism has so perverted your taste that you feel unable to realize anything from the world of fancy.... Let it be a quid pro quo, if you so choose it. Again, the Inquisitor is ninety years old, and he might have easily gone mad with his one idee fixe of power; or, it might have as well been a delirious vision, called forth by dying fancy, overheated by the auto-da-fe of the hundred heretics in that forenoon.... But what matters for the poem, whether it was a quid pro quo or an uncontrollable fancy? The question is, that the old man has to open his heart; that he must give out his thought at last; and that the hour has come when he does speak it out, and says loudly that which for ninety years he has kept secret within his own breast." "And his prisoner, does He never reply? Does He keep silent, looking at him, without saying a word?" "Of course; and it could not well be otherwise," again retorted Ivan. "The Grand Inquisitor begins from his very first words by telling Him that He has no right to add one syllable to that which He had said before. To make the situation clear at once, the above preliminary monologue is intended to convey to the reader the very fundamental idea which underlies Roman Catholicism--as well as I can convey it, his words mean, in short: 'Everything was given over by Thee to the Pope, and everything now rests with him alone; Thou hast no business to return and thus hinder us in our work.' In this sense the Jesuits not only talk but write likewise. "'Hast thou the right to divulge to us a single one of the mysteries of that world whence Thou comest?' enquires of Him my old Inquisitor, and forthwith answers for Him. 'Nay, Thou has no such right. For, that would be adding to that which was already said by Thee before; hence depriving people of that freedom for which Thou hast so stoutly stood up while yet on earth.... Anything new that Thou would now proclaim would have to be regarded as an attempt to interfere with that freedom of choice, as it would come as a new and a miraculous revelation superseding the old revelation of fifteen hundred years ago, when Thou didst so repeatedly tell the people: "The truth shall make you free." Behold then, Thy "free" people now!' adds the old man with sombre irony. 'Yea!... it has cost us dearly.' he continues, sternly looking at his victim. 'But we have at last accomplished our task, and--in Thy name.... For fifteen long centuries we had to toil and suffer owing to that "freedom": but now we have prevailed and our work is done, and well and strongly it is done. ....Believest not Thou it is so very strong? ... And why should Thou look at me so meekly as if I were not worthy even of Thy indignation?... Know then, that now, and only now, Thy people feel fully sure and satisfied of their freedom; and that only since they have themselves and of their own free will delivered that freedom unto our hands by placing it submissively at our feet. But then, that is what we have done. Is it that which Thou has striven for? Is this the kind of "freedom" Thou has promised them?'" "Now again, I do not understand," interrupted Alyosha. "Does the old man mock and laugh?" "Not in the least. He seriously regards it as a great service done by himself, his brother monks and Jesuits, to humanity, to have conquered and subjected unto their authority that freedom, and boasts that it was done but for the good of the world. 'For only now,' he says (speaking of the Inquisition) 'has it become possible to us, for the first time, to give a serious thought to human happiness. Man is born a rebel, and can rebels be ever happy?... Thou has been fairly warned of it, but evidently to no use, since Thou hast rejected the only means which could make mankind happy; fortunately at Thy departure Thou hast delivered the task to us.... Thou has promised, ratifying the pledge by Thy own words, in words giving us the right to bind and unbind... and surely, Thou couldst not think of depriving us of it now!'" "But what can he mean by the words, 'Thou has been fairly warned'?" asked Alexis. "These words give the key to what the old man has to say for his justification... But listen-- "'The terrible and wise spirit, the spirit of self annihilation and non-being,' goes on the Inquisitor, 'the great spirit of negation conversed with Thee in the wilderness, and we are told that he "tempted" Thee... Was it so? And if it were so, then it is impossible to utter anything more truthful than what is contained in his three offers, which Thou didst reject, and which are usually called "temptations." Yea; if ever there was on earth a genuine striking wonder produced, it was on that day of Thy three temptations, and it is precisely in these three short sentences that the marvelous miracle is contained. If it were possible that they should vanish and disappear for ever, without leaving any trace, from the record and from the memory of man, and that it should become necessary again to devise, invent, and make them reappear in Thy history once more, thinkest Thou that all the world's sages, all the legislators, initiates, philosophers and thinkers, if called upon to frame three questions which should, like these, besides answering the magnitude of the event, express in three short sentences the whole future history of this our world and of mankind--dost Thou believe, I ask Thee, that all their combined efforts could ever create anything equal in power and depth of thought to the three propositions offered Thee by the powerful and all-wise spirit in the wilderness? Judging of them by their marvelous aptness alone, one can at once perceive that they emanated not from a finite, terrestrial intellect, but indeed, from the Eternal and the Absolute. In these three offers we find, blended into one and foretold to us, the complete subsequent history of man; we are shown three images, so to say, uniting in them all the future axiomatic, insoluble problems and contradictions of human nature, the world over. In those days, the wondrous wisdom contained in them was not made so apparent as it is now, for futurity remained still veiled; but now, when fifteen centuries have elapsed, we see that everything in these three questions is so marvelously foreseen and foretold, that to add to, or to take away from, the prophecy one jot, would be absolutely impossible! "'Decide then thyself.' sternly proceeded the Inquisitor, 'which of ye twain was right: Thou who didst reject, or he who offered? Remember the subtle meaning of question the first, which runs thus: Wouldst Thou go into the world empty-handed? Would Thou venture thither with Thy vague and undefined promise of freedom, which men, dull and unruly as they are by nature, are unable so much as to understand, which they avoid and fear?--for never was there anything more unbearable to the human race than personal freedom! Dost Thou see these stones in the desolate and glaring wilderness? Command that these stones be made bread--and mankind will run after Thee, obedient and grateful like a herd of cattle. But even then it will be ever diffident and trembling, lest Thou should take away Thy hand, and they lose thereby their bread! Thou didst refuse to accept the offer for fear of depriving men of their free choice; for where is there freedom of choice where men are bribed with bread? Man shall not live by bread alone--was Thine answer. Thou knewest not, it seems, that it was precisely in the name of that earthly bread that the terrestrial spirit would one day rise against, struggle with, and finally conquer Thee, followed by the hungry multitudes shouting: "Who is like unto that Beast, who maketh fire come down from heaven upon the earth!" Knowest Thou not that, but a few centuries hence, and the whole of mankind will have proclaimed in its wisdom and through its mouthpiece, Science, that there is no more crime, hence no more sin on earth, but only hungry people? "Feed us first and then command us to be virtuous!" will be the words written upon the banner lifted against Thee--a banner which shall destroy Thy Church to its very foundations, and in the place of Thy Temple shall raise once more the terrible Tower of Babel; and though its building be left unfinished, as was that of the first one, yet the fact will remain recorded that Thou couldst, but wouldst not, prevent the attempt to build that new tower by accepting the offer, and thus saving mankind a millennium of useless suffering on earth. And it is to us that the people will return again. They will search for us catacombs, as we shall once more be persecuted and martyred--and they will begin crying unto us: "Feed us, for they who promised us the fire from heaven have deceived us!" It is then that we will finish building their tower for them. For they alone who feed them shall finish it, and we shall feed them in Thy name, and lying to them that it is in that name. Oh, never, never, will they learn to feed themselves without our help! No science will ever give them bread so long as they remain free, so long as they refuse to lay that freedom at our feet, and say: "Enslave, but feed us!" That day must come when men will understand that freedom and daily bread enough to satisfy all are unthinkable and can never be had together, as men will never be able to fairly divide the two among themselves. And they will also learn that they can never be free, for they are weak, vicious, miserable nonentities born wicked and rebellious. Thou has promised to them the bread of life, the bread of heaven; but I ask Thee again, can that bread ever equal in the sight of the weak and the vicious, the ever ungrateful human race, their daily bread on earth? And even supposing that thousands and tens of thousands follow Thee in the name of, and for the sake of, Thy heavenly bread, what will become of the millions and hundreds of millions of human beings to weak to scorn the earthly for the sake of Thy heavenly bread? Or is it but those tens of thousands chosen among the great and the mighty, that are so dear to Thee, while the remaining millions, innumerable as the grains of sand in the seas, the weak and the loving, have to be used as material for the former? No, no! In our sight and for our purpose the weak and the lowly are the more dear to us. True, they are vicious and rebellious, but we will force them into obedience, and it is they who will admire us the most. They will regard us as gods, and feel grateful to those who have consented to lead the masses and bear their burden of freedom by ruling over them--so terrible will that freedom at last appear to men! Then we will tell them that it is in obedience to Thy will and in Thy name that we rule over them. We will deceive them once more and lie to them once again--for never, never more will we allow Thee to come among us. In this deception we will find our suffering, for we must needs lie eternally, and never cease to lie! "Such is the secret meaning of "temptation" the first, and that is what Thou didst reject in the wilderness for the sake of that freedom which Thou didst prize above all. Meanwhile Thy tempter's offer contained another great world-mystery. By accepting the "bread," Thou wouldst have satisfied and answered a universal craving, a ceaseless longing alive in the heart of every individual human being, lurking in the breast of collective mankind, that most perplexing problem--"whom or what shall we worship?" There exists no greater or more painful anxiety for a man who has freed himself from all religious bias, than how he shall soonest find a new object or idea to worship. But man seeks to bow before that only which is recognized by the greater majority, if not by all his fellow-men, as having a right to be worshipped; whose rights are so unquestionable that men agree unanimously to bow down to it. For the chief concern of these miserable creatures is not to find and worship the idol of their own choice, but to discover that which all others will believe in, and consent to bow down to in a mass. It is that instinctive need of having a worship in common that is the chief suffering of every man, the chief concern of mankind from the beginning of times. It is for that universality of religious worship that people destroyed each other by sword. Creating gods unto themselves, they forwith began appealing to each other: "Abandon your deities, come and bow down to ours, or death to ye and your idols!" And so will they do till the end of this world; they will do so even then, when all the gods themselves have disappeared, for then men will prostrate themselves before and worship some idea. Thou didst know, Thou couldst not be ignorant of, that mysterious fundamental principle in human nature, and still thou hast rejected the only absolute banner offered Thee, to which all the nations would remain true, and before which all would have bowed--the banner of earthly bread, rejected in the name of freedom and of "bread in the kingdom of God"! Behold, then, what Thou hast done furthermore for that "freedom's" sake! I repeat to Thee, man has no greater anxiety in life than to find some one to whom he can make over that gift of freedom with which the unfortunate creature is born. But he alone will prove capable of silencing and quieting their consciences, that shall succeed in possessing himself of the freedom of men. With "daily bread" an irresistible power was offered Thee: show a man "bread" and he will follow Thee, for what can he resist less than the attraction of bread? But if, at the same time, another succeed in possessing himself of his conscience--oh! then even Thy bread will be forgotten, and man will follow him who seduced his conscience. So far Thou wert right. For the mystery of human being does not solely rest in the desire to live, but in the problem--for what should one live at all? Without a clear perception of his reasons for living, man will never consent to live, and will rather destroy himself than tarry on earth, though he be surrounded with bread. This is the truth. But what has happened? Instead of getting hold of man's freedom, Thou has enlarged it still more! Hast Thou again forgotten that to man rest and even death are preferable to a free choice between the knowledge of Good and Evil? Nothing seems more seductive in his eyes than freedom of conscience, and nothing proves more painful. And behold! instead of laying a firm foundation whereon to rest once for all man's conscience, Thou hast chosen to stir up in him all that is abnormal, mysterious, and indefinite, all that is beyond human strength, and has acted as if Thou never hadst any love for him, and yet Thou wert He who came to "lay down His life for His friends!" Thou hast burdened man's soul with anxieties hitherto unknown to him. Thirsting for human love freely given, seeking to enable man, seduced and charmed by Thee, to follow Thy path of his own free-will, instead of the old and wise law which held him in subjection, Thou hast given him the right henceforth to choose and freely decide what is good and bad for him, guided but by Thine image in his heart. But hast Thou never dreamt of the probability, nay, of the certainty, of that same man one day rejected finally, and controverting even Thine image and Thy truth, once he would find himself laden with such a terrible burden as freedom of choice? That a time would surely come when men would exclaim that Truth and Light cannot be in Thee, for no one could have left them in a greater perplexity and mental suffering than Thou has done, lading them with so many cares and insoluble problems. Thus, it is Thyself who hast laid the foundation for the destruction of Thine own kingdom and no one but Thou is to be blamed for it. "'Meantime, every chance of success was offered Thee. There are three Powers, three unique Forces upon earth, capable of conquering for ever by charming the conscience of these weak rebels--men--for their own good; and these Forces are: Miracle, Mystery and Authority. Thou hast rejected all the three, and thus wert the first to set them an example. When the terrible and all-wise spirit placed Thee on a pinnacle of the temple and said unto Thee, "If Thou be the son of God, cast Thyself down, for it is written, He shall give His angels charge concerning Thee: and in their hands they shall bear Thee up, lest at any time Thou dash Thy foot against a stone!"--for thus Thy faith in Thy father should have been made evident, Thou didst refuse to accept his suggestion and didst not follow it. Oh, undoubtedly, Thou didst act in this with all the magnificent pride of a god, but then men--that weak and rebel race--are they also gods, to understand Thy refusal? Of course, Thou didst well know that by taking one single step forward, by making the slightest motion to throw Thyself down, Thou wouldst have tempted "the Lord Thy God," lost suddenly all faith in Him, and dashed Thyself to atoms against that same earth which Thou camest to save, and thus wouldst have allowed the wise spirit which tempted Thee to triumph and rejoice. But, then, how many such as Thee are to be found on this globe, I ask Thee? Couldst Thou ever for a moment imagine that men would have the same strength to resist such a temptation? Is human nature calculated to reject miracle, and trust, during the most terrible moments in life, when the most momentous, painful and perplexing problems struggle within man's soul, to the free decisions of his heart for the true solution? Oh, Thou knewest well that that action of Thine would remain recorded in books for ages to come, reaching to the confines of the globe, and Thy hope was, that following Thy example, man would remain true to his God, without needing any miracle to keep his faith alive! But Thou knewest not, it seems, that no sooner would man reject miracle than he would reject God likewise, for he seeketh less God than "a sign" from Him. And thus, as it is beyond the power of man to remain without miracles, so, rather than live without, he will create for himself new wonders of his own making; and he will bow to and worship the soothsayer's miracles, the old witch's sorcery, were he a rebel, a heretic, and an atheist a hundred times over. Thy refusal to come down from the cross when people, mocking and wagging their heads were saying to Thee--"Save Thyself if Thou be the son of God, and we will believe in Thee," was due to the same determination--not to enslave man through miracle, but to obtain faith in Thee freely and apart from any miraculous influence. Thou thirstest for free and uninfluenced love, and refuses the passionate adoration of the slave before a Potency which would have subjected his will once for ever. Thou judgest of men too highly here, again, for though rebels they be, they are born slaves and nothing more. Behold, and judge of them once more, now that fifteen centuries have elapsed since that moment. Look at them, whom Thou didst try to elevate unto Thee! I swear man is weaker and lower than Thou hast ever imagined him to be! Can he ever do that which Thou art said to have accomplished? By valuing him so highly Thou hast acted as if there were no love for him in Thine heart, for Thou hast demanded of him more than he could ever give--Thou, who lovest him more than Thyself! Hadst Thou esteemed him less, less wouldst Thou have demanded of him, and that would have been more like love, for his burden would have been made thereby lighter. Man is weak and cowardly. What matters it, if he now riots and rebels throughout the world against our will and power, and prides himself upon that rebellion? It is but the petty pride and vanity of a school-boy. It is the rioting of little children, getting up a mutiny in the class-room and driving their schoolmaster out of it. But it will not last long, and when the day of their triumph is over, they will have to pay dearly for it. They will destroy the temples and raze them to the ground, flooding the earth with blood. But the foolish children will have to learn some day that, rebels though they be and riotous from nature, they are too weak to maintain the spirit of mutiny for any length of time. Suffused with idiotic tears, they will confess that He who created them rebellious undoubtedly did so but to mock them. They will pronounce these words in despair, and such blasphemous utterances will but add to their misery--for human nature cannot endure blasphemy, and takes her own revenge in the end. "'And thus, after all Thou has suffered for mankind and its freedom, the present fate of men may be summed up in three words: Unrest, Confusion, Misery! Thy great prophet John records in his vision, that he saw, during the first resurrection of the chosen servants of God--"the number of them which were sealed" in their foreheads, "twelve thousand" of every tribe. But were they, indeed, as many? Then they must have been gods, not men. They had shared Thy Cross for long years, suffered scores of years' hunger and thirst in dreary wildernesses and deserts, feeding upon locusts and roots--and of these children of free love for Thee, and self-sacrifice in Thy name, Thou mayest well feel proud. But remember that these are but a few thousands--of gods, not men; and how about all others? And why should the weakest be held guilty for not being able to endure what the strongest have endured? Why should a soul incapable of containing such terrible gifts be punished for its weakness? Didst Thou really come to, and for, the "elect" alone? If so, then the mystery will remain for ever mysterious to our finite minds. And if a mystery, then were we right to proclaim it as one, and preach it, teaching them that neither their freely given love to Thee nor freedom of conscience were essential, but only that incomprehensible mystery which they must blindly obey even against the dictates of their conscience. Thus did we. We corrected and improved Thy teaching and based it upon "Miracle, Mystery, and Authority." And men rejoiced at finding themselves led once more like a herd of cattle, and at finding their hearts at last delivered of the terrible burden laid upon them by Thee, which caused them so much suffering. Tell me, were we right in doing as we did. Did not we show our great love for humanity, by realizing in such a humble spirit its helplessness, by so mercifully lightening its great burden, and by permitting and remitting for its weak nature every sin, provided it be committed with our authorization? For what, then, hast Thou come again to trouble us in our work? And why lookest Thou at me so penetratingly with Thy meek eyes, and in such a silence? Rather shouldst Thou feel wroth, for I need not Thy love, I reject it, and love Thee not, myself. Why should I conceal the truth from Thee? I know but too well with whom I am now talking! What I had to say was known to Thee before, I read it in Thine eye. How should I conceal from Thee our secret? If perchance Thou wouldst hear it from my own lips, then listen: We are not with Thee, but with him, and that is our secret! For centuries have we abandoned Thee to follow him, yes--eight centuries. Eight hundred years now since we accepted from him the gift rejected by Thee with indignation; that last gift which he offered Thee from the high mountain when, showing all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them, he saith unto Thee: "All these things will I give Thee, if Thou will fall down and worship me!" We took Rome from him and the glaive of Caesar, and declared ourselves alone the kings of this earth, its sole kings, though our work is not yet fully accomplished. But who is to blame for it? Our work is but in its incipient stage, but it is nevertheless started. We may have long to wait until its culmination, and mankind have to suffer much, but we shall reach the goal some day, and become sole Caesars, and then will be the time to think of universal happiness for men. "'Thou couldst accept the glaive of Caesar Thyself; why didst Thou reject the offer? By accepting from the powerful spirit his third offer Thou would have realized every aspiration man seeketh for himself on earth; man would have found a constant object for worship; one to deliver his conscience up to, and one that should unite all together into one common and harmonious ant-hill; for an innate necessity for universal union constitutes the third and final affliction of mankind. Humanity as a whole has ever aspired to unite itself universally. Many were, the great nations with great histories, but the greater they were, the more unhappy they felt, as they felt the stronger necessity of a universal union among men. Great conquerors, like Timoor and Tchengis-Khan, passed like a cyclone upon the face of the earth in their efforts to conquer the universe, but even they, albeit unconsciously, expressed the same aspiration towards universal and common union. In accepting the kingdom of the world and Caesar's purple, one would found a universal kingdom and secure to mankind eternal peace. And who can rule mankind better than those who have possessed themselves of man's conscience, and hold in their hand man's daily bread? Having accepted Caesar's glaive and purple, we had, of course, but to deny Thee, to henceforth follow him alone. Oh, centuries of intellectual riot and rebellious free thought are yet before us, and their science will end by anthropophagy, for having begun to build their Babylonian tower without our help they will have to end by anthropophagy. But it is precisely at that time that the Beast will crawl up to us in full submission, and lick the soles of our feet, and sprinkle them with tears of blood and we shall sit upon the scarlet-colored Beast, and lifting up high the golden cup "full of abomination and filthiness," shall show written upon it the word "Mystery"! But it is only then that men will see the beginning of a kingdom of peace and happiness. Thou art proud of Thine own elect, but Thou has none other but these elect, and we--we will give rest to all. But that is not the end. Many are those among thine elect and the laborers of Thy vineyard, who, tired of waiting for Thy coming, already have carried and will yet carry, the great fervor of their hearts and their spiritual strength into another field, and will end by lifting up against Thee Thine own banner of freedom. But it is Thyself Thou hast to thank. Under our rule and sway all will be happy, and will neither rebel nor destroy each other as they did while under Thy free banner. Oh, we will take good care to prove to them that they will become absolutely free only when they have abjured their freedom in our favor and submit to us absolutely. Thinkest Thou we shall be right or still lying? They will convince themselves of our rightness, for they will see what a depth of degrading slavery and strife that liberty of Thine has led them into. Liberty, Freedom of Thought and Conscience, and Science will lead them into such impassable chasms, place them face to face before such wonders and insoluble mysteries, that some of them--more rebellious and ferocious than the rest--will destroy themselves; others--rebellious but weak--will destroy each other; while the remainder, weak, helpless and miserable, will crawl back to our feet and cry: "'Yes; right were ye, oh Fathers of Jesus; ye alone are in possession of His mystery, and we return to you, praying that ye save us from ourselves!" Receiving their bread from us, they will clearly see that we take the bread from them, the bread made by their own hands, but to give it back to them in equal shares and that without any miracle; and having ascertained that, though we have not changed stones into bread, yet bread they have, while every other bread turned verily in their own hands into stones, they will be only to glad to have it so. Until that day, they will never be happy. And who is it that helped the most to blind them, tell me? Who separated the flock and scattered it over ways unknown if it be not Thee? But we will gather the sheep once more and subject them to our will for ever. We will prove to them their own weakness and make them humble again, whilst with Thee they have learnt but pride, for Thou hast made more of them than they ever were worth. We will give them that quiet, humble happiness, which alone benefits such weak, foolish creatures as they are, and having once had proved to them their weakness, they will become timid and obedient, and gather around us as chickens around their hen. They will wonder at and feel a superstitious admiration for us, and feel proud to be led by men so powerful and wise that a handful of them can subject a flock a thousand millions strong. Gradually men will begin to fear us. They will nervously dread our slightest anger, their intellects will weaken, their eyes become as easily accessible to tears as those of children and women; but we will teach them an easy transition from grief and tears to laughter, childish joy and mirthful song. Yes; we will make them work like slaves, but during their recreation hours they shall have an innocent child-like life, full of play and merry laughter. We will even permit them sin, for, weak and helpless, they will feel the more love for us for permitting them to indulge in it. We will tell them that every kind of sin will be remitted to them, so long as it is done with our permission; that we take all these sins upon ourselves, for we so love the world, that we are even willing to sacrifice our souls for its satisfaction. And, appearing before them in the light of their scapegoats and redeemers, we shall be adored the more for it. They will have no secrets from us. It will rest with us to permit them to live with their wives and concubines, or to forbid them, to have children or remain childless, either way depending on the degree of their obedience to us; and they will submit most joyfully to us the most agonizing secrets of their souls--all, all will they lay down at our feet, and we will authorize and remit them all in Thy name, and they will believe us and accept our mediation with rapture, as it will deliver them from their greatest anxiety and torture--that of having to decide freely for themselves. And all will be happy, all except the one or two hundred thousands of their rulers. For it is but we, we the keepers of the great Mystery who will be miserable. There will be thousands of millions of happy infants, and one hundred thousand martyrs who have taken upon themselves the curse of knowledge of good and evil. Peaceable will be their end, and peacefully will they die, in Thy name, to find behind the portals of the grave--but death. But we will keep the secret inviolate, and deceive them for their own good with the mirage of life eternal in Thy kingdom. For, were there really anything like life beyond the grave, surely it would never fall to the lot of such as they! People tell us and prophesy of Thy coming and triumphing once more on earth; of Thy appearing with the army of Thy elect, with Thy proud and mighty ones; but we will answer Thee that they have saved but themselves while we have saved all. We are also threatened with the great disgrace which awaits the whore, "Babylon the great, the mother of harlots"--who sits upon the Beast, holding in her hands the Mystery, the word written upon her forehead; and we are told that the weak ones, the lambs shall rebel against her and shall make her desolate and naked. But then will I arise, and point out to Thee the thousands of millions of happy infants free from any sin. And we who have taken their sins upon us, for their own good, shall stand before Thee and say: "Judge us if Thou canst and darest!" Know then that I fear Thee not. Know that I too have lived in the dreary wilderness, where I fed upon locusts and roots, that I too have blessed freedom with which thou hast blessed men, and that I too have once prepared to join the ranks of Thy elect, the proud and the mighty. But I awoke from my delusion and refused since then to serve insanity. I returned to join the legion of those who corrected Thy mistakes. I left the proud and returned to the really humble, and for their own happiness. What I now tell thee will come to pass, and our kingdom shall be built, I tell Thee not later than to-morrow Thou shalt see that obedient flock which at one simple motion of my hand will rush to add burning coals to Thy stake, on which I will burn Thee for having dared to come and trouble us in our work. For, if there ever was one who deserved more than any of the others our inquisitorial fires--it is Thee! To-morrow I will burn Thee. Dixi'." Ivan paused. He had entered into the situation and had spoken with great animation, but now he suddenly burst out laughing. "But all that is absurd!" suddenly exclaimed Alyosha, who had hitherto listened perplexed and agitated but in profound silence. "Your poem is a glorification of Christ, not an accusation, as you, perhaps, meant to be. And who will believe you when you speak of 'freedom'? Is it thus that we Christians must understand it? It is Rome (not all Rome, for that would be unjust), but the worst of the Roman Catholics, the Inquisitors and Jesuits, that you have been exposing! Your Inquisitor is an impossible character. What are these sins they are taking upon themselves? Who are those keepers of mystery who took upon themselves a curse for the good of mankind? Who ever met them? We all know the Jesuits, and no one has a good word to say in their favor; but when were they as you depict them? Never, never! The Jesuits are merely a Romish army making ready for their future temporal kingdom, with a mitred emperor--a Roman high priest at their head. That is their ideal and object, without any mystery or elevated suffering. The most prosaic thirsting for power, for the sake of the mean and earthly pleasures of life, a desire to enslave their fellow-men, something like our late system of serfs, with themselves at the head as landed proprietors--that is all that they can be accused of. They may not believe in God, that is also possible, but your suffering Inquisitor is simply--a fancy!" "Hold, hold!" interrupted Ivan, smiling. "Do not be so excited. A fancy, you say; be it so! Of course, it is a fancy. But stop. Do you really imagine that all this Catholic movement during the last centuries is naught but a desire for power for the mere purpose of 'mean pleasures'? Is this what your Father Paissiy taught you?" "No, no, quite the reverse, for Father Paissiy once told me something very similar to what you yourself say, though, of course, not that--something quite different," suddenly added Alexis, blushing. "A precious piece of information, notwithstanding your 'not that.' I ask you, why should the Inquisitors and the Jesuits of your imagination live but for the attainment of 'mean material pleasures?' Why should there not be found among them one single genuine martyr suffering under a great and holy idea and loving humanity with all his heart? Now let us suppose that among all these Jesuits thirsting and hungering but after 'mean material pleasures' there may be one, just one like my old Inquisitor, who had himself fed upon roots in the wilderness, suffered the tortures of damnation while trying to conquer flesh, in order to become free and perfect, but who had never ceased to love humanity, and who one day prophetically beheld the truth; who saw as plain as he could see that the bulk of humanity could never be happy under the old system, that it was not for them that the great Idealist had come and died and dreamt of His Universal Harmony. Having realized that truth, he returned into the world and joined--intelligent and practical people. Is this so impossible?" "Joined whom? What intelligent and practical people?" exclaimed Alyosha quite excited. "Why should they be more intelligent than other men, and what secrets and mysteries can they have? They have neither. Atheism and infidelity is all the secret they have. Your Inquisitor does not believe in God, and that is all the Mystery there is in it!" "It may be so. You have guessed rightly there. And it is so, and that is his whole secret; but is this not the acutest sufferings for such a man as he, who killed all his young life in asceticism in the desert, and yet could not cure himself of his love towards his fellowmen? Toward the end of his life he becomes convinced that it is only by following the advice of the great and terrible spirit that the fate of these millions of weak rebels, these 'half-finished samples of humanity created in mockery' can be made tolerable. And once convinced of it, he sees as clearly that to achieve that object, one must follow blindly the guidance of the wise spirit, the fearful spirit of death and destruction, hence accept a system of lies and deception and lead humanity consciously this time toward death and destruction, and moreover, be deceiving them all the while in order to prevent them from realizing where they are being led, and so force the miserable blind men to feel happy, at least while here on earth. And note this: a wholesale deception in the name of Him, in whose ideal the old man had so passionately, so fervently, believed during nearly his whole life! Is this no suffering? And were such a solitary exception found amidst, and at the head of, that army 'that thirsts for power but for the sake of the mean pleasures of life,' think you one such man would not suffice to bring on a tragedy? Moreover, one single man like my Inquisitor as a principal leader, would prove sufficient to discover the real guiding idea of the Romish system with all its armies of Jesuits, the greatest and chiefest conviction that the solitary type described in my poem has at no time ever disappeared from among the chief leaders of that movement. Who knows but that terrible old man, loving humanity so stubbornly and in such an original way, exists even in our days in the shape of a whole host of such solitary exceptions, whose existence is not due to mere chance, but to a well-defined association born of mutual consent, to a secret league, organized several centuries back, in order to guard the Mystery from the indiscreet eyes of the miserable and weak people, and only in view of their own happiness? And so it is; it cannot be otherwise. I suspect that even Masons have some such Mystery underlying the basis of their organization, and that it is just the reason why the Roman Catholic clergy hate them so, dreading to find in them rivals, competition, the dismemberment of the unity of the idea, for the realization of which one flock and one Shepherd are needed. However, in defending my idea, I look like an author whose production is unable to stand criticism. Enough of this." "You are, perhaps, a Mason yourself!" exclaimed Alyosha. "You do not believe in God," he added, with a note of profound sadness in his voice. But suddenly remarking that his brother was looking at him with mockery, "How do you mean then to bring your poem to a close?" he unexpectedly enquired, casting his eyes downward, "or does it break off here?" "My intention is to end it with the following scene: Having disburdened his heart, the Inquisitor waits for some time to hear his prisoner speak in His turn. His silence weighs upon him. He has seen that his captive has been attentively listening to him all the time, with His eyes fixed penetratingly and softly on the face of his jailer, and evidently bent upon not replying to him. The old man longs to hear His voice, to hear Him reply; better words of bitterness and scorn than His silence. Suddenly He rises; slowly and silently approaching the Inquisitor, He bends towards him and softly kisses the bloodless, four-score and-ten-year-old lips. That is all the answer. The Grand Inquisitor shudders. There is a convulsive twitch at the corner of his mouth. He goes to the door, opens it, and addressing Him, 'Go,' he says, 'go, and return no more... do not come again... never, never!' and--lets Him out into the dark night. The prisoner vanishes." "And the old man?" "The kiss burns his heart, but the old man remains firm in his own ideas and unbelief." "And you, together with him? You too!" despairingly exclaimed Alyosha, while Ivan burst into a still louder fit of laughter.
PIGS BREAKFAST GLOBALIZATION
Tuesday, January 30, 2018
RE CIA CHIEF SAYS CHINA AS BIG THREAT AS RUSSIA
This comes as a bewildering sudden surprise revelation to most Americans.
Stealing secrets, both government and industrial, and influencing both, has been the biggest industry on the planet now, for decades, actually since the 19th Century, first by Russia and Japan, then the tigers, then finally by China.
He acts like there is still something much here worth stealing, which, frankly, I very much doubt, at this point.
My old saying:
Never, in the history of human conflict, has some much been given away, to so many by so few, for so little, so quickly.
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
RE A WORLD IN DISARRAY CFR PRESIDENT HAASS PILLSBURY TAKE A LOOK IN THE MIRROR BABY
I have ordered this book. New York Republican Jewish Rhodes Scholar. Think about it. Reluctant Sheriff.... Think Tipsy Coachman...
World in disarray. I could not have said it any better myself.
Great irony: CFR ideology, and its predecessor LIEO institutions, both public and private, long list, Milner Group, BW, WB, IMF, EIB, NATO, WTO, etc., solely responsible for the disarray he now bemoans.
Take a look in the mirror, Mr Haass....Counterpoint "Xi Jinping's Dilemma", highly cynical sour grapes nonsense, very very late in the day.
His discussion of all the problems Xi faces were he to turn this way or that, strategically diplomatically or economically, using leverage or not, shows Haass has had a lot of experience regarding pivoting this way or that himself!
China has come an awful long way since 1971, licking your LIEO butt Mr Haass. Think about that, regarding blaming them for their pollution and other high growth related problems you saddled them with, inequality, debt, corruption, you mention.
Haass thinks checks and balances might help Xi....
Kindofa Michael Pillsbury, The Hundred-Year Marathon, moment, what.
Time to seriously consider offshoring, in a small boat, LIEO Think Tank guys like Pillsbury and Haass, etc etc, long long list...
Like rats, Pillsbury, Haass, etc, abandoning a sinking ship....
World in disarray. I could not have said it any better myself.
Great irony: CFR ideology, and its predecessor LIEO institutions, both public and private, long list, Milner Group, BW, WB, IMF, EIB, NATO, WTO, etc., solely responsible for the disarray he now bemoans.
Take a look in the mirror, Mr Haass....Counterpoint "Xi Jinping's Dilemma", highly cynical sour grapes nonsense, very very late in the day.
His discussion of all the problems Xi faces were he to turn this way or that, strategically diplomatically or economically, using leverage or not, shows Haass has had a lot of experience regarding pivoting this way or that himself!
China has come an awful long way since 1971, licking your LIEO butt Mr Haass. Think about that, regarding blaming them for their pollution and other high growth related problems you saddled them with, inequality, debt, corruption, you mention.
Haass thinks checks and balances might help Xi....
Kindofa Michael Pillsbury, The Hundred-Year Marathon, moment, what.
Time to seriously consider offshoring, in a small boat, LIEO Think Tank guys like Pillsbury and Haass, etc etc, long long list...
Like rats, Pillsbury, Haass, etc, abandoning a sinking ship....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)