ANDREW CUOMO NY UPDATE YESTERDAY WAS I GUESS THE BEST SPEECH MADE BY AN AMERICAN POLITICIAN LATELY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ1eVBDIf8k

If you know of a better one, by anyone, let me know.
I thought Bottoms' harangue was also quite good.

BIZARRO ZOMBIE DIALOGUE

Robots are zombies.
They are replacing journalists.
Journalists are bizarros.
Bizarros are not zombies.
Then neither are robots.
What are replacing journalists?
Zombies.
Robots are replacing journalists.
Bizarros are replacing robots.
Robots bizarros and zombies are journalists.

AMY COOPER WAS AFRAID FOR HER LIFE YOU CAN SAY SHE WAS WRONG

You can say it was about the dog or about bird watching. Fine.

Christian Cooper was not a threat to her. You find that out afterward. She did not know that. Or maybe she did. You decide.

Let's just suppose that it was the same fear, maybe irrational, visceral, fear,  that motivated white Northerners to elect Lincoln in 1860. 

Let's suppose that not only was she a racist, but also a fearful one. Why not assume that.

BIZARRO POP UP GROWTH UP CARNIVAL OF VENICE

BIZARRO POPULATION UP GROWTH DOWN STAGPARTYNATION

BIZARRO GLOBALIST IDEA POPULATION SPIKE EQUALS GROWTH SPURT

CHRISTO GOOD RIDDANCE TO THIS FUCKING IDIOT

COVID 19 FREED ENORMOUS NUMBERS OF DISSATISFIED PEOPLE TO FUEL PROTESTS

widespread protests on the right against lock downs, protests on the left against Floyd, and on all sides against unemployment benefits unpaid.

Perfect storm for all Americans on each side to fight it out on the streets really.

IT IS NOT JUST RED STATES SCREWING COVID UNEMPLOYED SEE ANDREW CUOMO TODAY

24 minutes in....

It is not like only Republican states are screwing the unemployed poor.

Trust me.

MOZAMBIQUE MUSLIMS TRY TO TAKE AFRICA NEGRO RESOURCES BEFORE CHINKS DO

You can try to candy coat it.

THEY BUY COLLECT AND SELL YOUR DATA YOUR RACE IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA THEY ALL USE BABY GET OVER IT

When ads pop up on your dumb handheld member, they are targeting you, based on their data as a whitey or as a negro. Forget your not a negro, in the global IT marketplace.
Forget it.


Nadine White, a journalist for the Huffington Post, tweeted that the abuse "needs to be acknowledged, removed, explained, apologised for asap. Being Black right now is hard enough; we don't need to be called the N- word while shopping online, to boot". BBC

The lot of negroes, throughout prehistory even, has never been a bowl of cherries.
For almost all of it, being any color wasn't either.

The negro word is also coming back bigtime in paleogenetics. Everyone knows racial classifications are key to many avenues of inquiry re both history and prehistory. See David Reich, ch. 10, 11. See Ch 9 re Africa.

ROBOTS ARE ROBOT NEUTRAL

Microsoft 'to replace journalists with robots'

Trust me, I am there. 

Those are the kind of journalists Americans deserve!

What about Krugman criticizing economists for worrying about robots?

Following Microsoft, why not simply replace economists with robots, too?

That is a WIN WIN, not a Zero Sum Game!

FLOYD WAS NOT CHOKED TO DEATH BUT DEATH HAPPENED

The preliminary autopsy, included in the criminal complaint against Mr Chauvin, did not find evidence of "traumatic asphyxia or strangulation".

The medical examiner noted Mr Floyd had underlying heart conditions... 

ARGUING WITH BIZARROS

KRUGMAN EQUITABLE GROWTH ARGUING WITH ZOMBIES INTERVIEW

Watching this interview, I came away with several simpleton takeaways:

The global economy is not too bad (even with COVID effects and responses so far).

The domestic economy is not too bad (even with COVID effects and responses so far).

Economics has had its minor weaknesses, here or there, but generally is an ok discipline, and has helped us get where we are today.

These are Krugman Bizarro ideas.

The average Joe could learn more about what has been going on in the world by reading, say, Gregory Clark, than reading Arguing With Zombies. 

You would learn more about real world economics, not Mickey Mouse economics. Clark brings back "the dismal" in The Dismal Science.

BIZARRO ECONOMICS

Bizarros confront Zombies Head To Head in a Zero Sum Game.

CLASSIC PRE READING PILLSBURY ON CHINA POST

Sunday, March 27, 2016

CLASSIC 2011 POST QUOTE RE AMERICA'S FACTORY AND BANKER

Here is a quote from The Coming Conflict With China: 


'"(As for the United States) for a relatively long time it will be absolutely necessary that we quietly nurse our sense of vengeance....We must conceal our abilities and bide our time."--Lieutenant General Mi Zhenyu, Vice Commandant, Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing.'

THE 1619 PROJECT BRAINSTORMING DIALOGUE NOW

We have to tag all white men.
White Jewish women get a pass.
I agree. all white men, Boomer racists.
Don't bring up the 60s!
Go generational on their asses!
Whitey global capitalism....make them look all Republicans!
Beat that African drum.
That's a start.

TERRI GROSS JOE BIDEN INTERCHANGE OFF MIKE

They say you now have to pick a negro woman.
Right, Terri. I'm being railroaded!
Can you win with that ticket?
No. Remember the 60s?
What do you mean?
Race riots are tar babies, especially for Democrats.
"If you vote for Trump you ain't black" sounds like a loser now.
Right, Terri.
Agribusiness supersized especially negroes, Joe.
Here's VOX choice, Terri. It's the big one in the photo:



Right, Kamala is really a Muslim. The other, mulatto.

THE DOOMSDAY DEMOCRACY

HONG KONG THATCHER DENG

Thatcher later said that Deng told her bluntly that China could easily take Hong Kong by force, stating that "I could walk in and take the whole lot this afternoon", to which she replied that "there is nothing I could do to stop you, but the eyes of the world would now know what China is like".

Consequently, because ceding Hong Kong came at the end of half a century of decolonisation, and because the handover meant that the United Kingdom became without significant overseas territories, dominions, or colonies for the first time in its history (Great Britain, having been bequeathed the incipient domains of its later empire by inheriting the colonial possessions of the Kingdom of England upon the passing of the Acts of Union 1707, always having been an imperial power, ab initio) the handover of Hong Kong to China is regarded by some as marking the conclusion of the British Empire, with 1 July 1997 being its end date and the handover ceremony being its last diplomatic act.

The Chinese have been, are, and will be, about as grateful to the US as they have been to Britain, even though it was the US which foolishly required the West to decolonize:

Sir Michael Howard, Lessons Of History, "1945--End of an Era?":"Only one thing could have prolonged the existence of the  European  Empires---the continuing approval and support of the United States. It was the denial of that support that spelled the end of the old European Empires. The citizens of the United States had not joined in the Second World War to prop up a system of imperial domination against which they had been the first people to revolt.  And it has been with genuine bewilderment that they find themselves today so generally reviled as its inheritor....."

The US has been The Doomsday Democracy for the West.

Terms search: grateful

THE 1619 PROJECT KILLER MIKE T SHIRT 'KILL YOUR MASTERS'

'But don't burn your own house down.'

Killer Mike's advice.

CIVILIZATIONAL GENETICS GOES BEYOND CLARK'S MALTHUSIAN ACCOUNT

THE LIKELIHOOD OF NEGROES ACCEPTING A WHITE MINORITY IS AS LOW AS THAT OF WHITES ACCEPTING A NEGRO ONE

Maybe lower.

Why candy coat it?

Many similar analogies with other races.......

Koreans, Chinese, and Japanese all score higher on IQ test than whites. Wade p. 

Why would they even think of considering them equals?

Woody

For now, I still side with DK on this.
My views on Woody's art aside.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/may/29/do-i-really-care-woody-allen-comes-out-fighting

GREGORY CLARK THE MALTHUSIAN TRAP RE TECHNOLOGY TRAP

The net effect, as we see today, is that it (TECHNOLOGY) has increased the stock of the human population (a bad thing), without improving much if anything else, and has done considerable harm in diverse ways to the natural world, what economists would later call externalities.

This post is dedicated to Greta Thunberg.

THE GIFT THAT KEEPS GIVING FOUR MORE WOMEN ON WEINSTEIN

COULD THIS BE ANYTHING BUT A FALSE STORY? A COLONIAL KITTY GENOVESE?

a Philadelphia newspaper reported a striking encounter on that city’s streets. A white woman was appalled when an African-American man refused to make way for her on the sidewalk, to which he responded, “Stay, you damned white bitch, till Lord Dunmore and his black regiment come, and then we will see who is to take the wall.”

WE ALREADY KNOW MOST ALL HINDUS AND AFRICANS DEFECATE IN THE OPEN

That is now a given, baby, in spite of Bill Gates' best efforts.... Terms search: defecate open, 

Here's another fun fact I have referred to before re global income convergence and how much Western liberals and their economists long for this sublime global equalitarian state.

Martin Meredith notes, as I have noted, that half of Africa's 800 million (an understated number, I believe), live on less than $1 a day. A day! Wade, p. 175.

The interesting question, then, is, How much less?  50 cents, 25 cents, 10 cents, a nickel?

Let's look at his other phrase, the other half live on a $1 or more. 

Does that mean that almost all the other half billion, except the top .0001 percent, mostly live on, say, a dollar to a dollar ten cents a day? $1.20? $1.04?

AMERICA NEEDS A GREEN NEW DEAL MORGENTHAU PLAN

When you voluntarily deindustrialize, over a long period of time, while not in war, you still eventually need to have a way to either feed clothe and shelter your population or euthanize a proportion of them or let them starve. 

Starvation and tribal war are the mechanisms often selected in the less developed world.  

There is no third alternative on this 'no war, no colonialism' hypothesis except widespread and permanent welfare, at the expense of those wealthy enough to bear this burden into perpetuity. 

A Morgenthau agrarianization green new deal at least relieves some of the burden and uncertainty of wealth sponsored welfare tittitainment.

Those are some of the hard choices coming sooner than you think.

This post is dedicated to Thomas Piketty and Paul Krugman, gurus of the terrain ahead.

KRUGMAN ARGUING WITH ZOMBIES

Lotta cash out there.
But, hello, low interest rates. 
Real negativo "riskless"  return w inflation (plus or minus easing).
He advocates infrastructure spending ostensibly as a domestic stimulus. Is that a Green New Deal, or not? 
He advocates debt funded infrastructure.

What about small family farms as a Green New Infrastructure Deal, a sort of Morgenthau Agrification Plan for the new poverino West's masses, for the obsolesced offshored and globally converged, temporarily tittitained but under subsidized, lower and middle Western class?


He is not worried about currencies it seems.
Bemoaning deficits, that is for zombies

THE 1619 PROJECT KING GEORGE IN BLACKFACE JUST LIKE DOUGLAS' LINCOLN'S BLACK REPUBLICANS

The Huntington Rebels dolled King George up in BLACKFACE, and burned him in effigy.

See the article, in the NYT, of all places, July 4, 2016, Robert Parkinson.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/did-a-fear-of-slave-revolts-drive-american-independence.html

Why the Narrative Goals of the 1619 Project Matter, NR article:

This thing is useful for reference. It places the NYT project in a box, and approaches much of what it describes in somewhat false boxes, the 5 narratives. The Lincoln narrative we have been given is sadly bereft of so much equivocation and racism by Lincoln and moderate Republicans. The Lost cause one is also a crippled account. All of them are falsified accounts, either by their proponents, advocates, or critics like this author.

The fact that the NYT has turned this Project into school curriculum is even more alarming than the NR's critique of it.

THE DUTCH AND POLISH ENLIGHTENMENTS BUT NO ENLIGHTENMENT ON THE GROUND

This is an enlightenment miracle.

Friday, September 30, 2016

HOLLAND AND POLAND REPRESENTED ENLIGHTENMENT IDEALS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR ENLIGHTENMENT

THE 1619 PROJECT RACIAL AND CIVIILIZATIONAL BACKWARDNESS

Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere, are backward because of probable long developing genetic backwardness, not at all because of Western domination, imperialism, slavery, or oppression. See Wade, former NYT Science editor, p. 177

This is the case, both historically and prehistorically, whether Gregory Clark happens to be either right or wrong about the Industrial Revolution; regardless of whether Elias' work on violence is right or wrong; and despite Pinker's ultimately hypocritical Whiggish criticism of Clark. See Wade, p 171, fn 20.

NEGROES MIGRATING TO OFFWHITE WEST FROM AFRICA WITH WHITE HELP AT OVER 70,000 A YEAR

Richard Dowden, Wade, p. 176.

Dowden is an apostle that the pathetic state of Africa is the result of Western imposed history.

What an idiot.

Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere, are backward because of probable long developing genetic backwardness, not at all because of Western domination, imperialism, slavery, or oppression. See Wade, p. 177

Why not reprise this great old rant with Rupert Chapman Middle East summary:

Sunday, June 1, 2014 

RUFUS FEARS THE MIDDLE EAST THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRES RUPERT CHAPMAN COMMENT 

"Stimulating and thought provoking as per usual! I have only one comment, which is on the Middle East, which is my own specialization. The situation today in the Middle East is precisely the same as it has been for the last 5,000 years. I have, for many years, referred to it as either 'the 5,000 year war', or as 'stable instability'. To explain what I mean, some 5,000 years ago the Stela of the Vultures is the earliest record of a war - between the Sumerians, in what is today southern Iraq, and the Elamites, in what is today southern Iran. In Iraq itself, for the last 5,000 years there has been tension, and frequently open warfare, between the south, Sumer/Babylonia, and the north, Assyria. The mountains of the northeast have always been a separate culture area, as they are with the Kurds (known there since at least the 4th century A.D.) today, at war with the powers in the plains. The second great enemy of the Assyrians, after the Elamites and the Persians, was the kingdom of Urartu in what is now eastern Turkey, later the independent kingdom of Armenia. In the heyday of Sumerian culture, between 3500 and 2000 B.C., the Sumerians had colonies along the Middle Euphrates in what is today Syria. The Syrians and the Mesopotamians traded and intermittently fought wars against each other. Syria itself has been a single culture, east of the mountains which mark the northern extension of the Great Rift Valley along the Mediterranean Coast, but never a unified country until the French created one. War between the Syrian city-states was endemic throughout all periods of antiquity when they were not under the control of some external power. The Mediterranean Coastal Region was always culturally separate from Inland Syria, and always an economic trading culture between the great powers which surrounded it. Further south, what is today Israel and the West Bank was always either at war with Transjordan, or in an uneasy peace, and likewise in relation to Syria and what is now Lebanon, and to Egypt, the nearest great power, and the dominant culture. What keeps all of these relations of conflict and limited co-operation in place is, to me, one of the most interesting unasked, and, therefore, unanswered questions of historical studies." R CHAPMAN

The Old Testament claims that the Egyptians enslaved the Hebrews, who had previously swung, back with Adam, across and around Mesopotamia to Israel, then later, down in Egypt ( The Deep Deep South : Africa).

Doubtless, these Egyptians (Egyptians already were mulattoes) interbred with those Hebrews long before Moses liberated them to the so called Promised Land.

Moses had, after all, married a Cushite woman, a negro Midianite, Zipporah. Or is this merely a slander of Moses by the Aaronid priesthood? You decide.

Muslims, Islam, Jews, Palestinians, very, very mulatto....

The Sociology of Philosophies, Randall Collins, very prominent sociologist, in a position to know the details, trust me (I read the entire 1,000 plus pages), rhapsodized about how wonderfully and pacifically negroes and Muslims had long and unproblematically intermixed over the centuries and millenia in the Near East, implicitly contrasting it with the modern American experience since The Lincoln Shock. 

Collins, of course, doesn't get into how non pacific, how problematic, Moses' marriage to Zipporah had been apparently, probably both among the Hebrews and among the Midianites!  Just smooth Middle Eastern sailing, to listen to Collins.

I am certain that the incorporation of white sex slaves into Islam was equally politically unproblematic (from Collins' point of view, pace Mozart), although cat fights of color in the Seraglio would seldom have been widely reported, would they?

The West Side Story story changed over time:

In 1947, Jerome Robbins approached Leonard Bernstein and Arthur Laurents about collaborating on a contemporary musical adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. He proposed that the plot focus on the conflict between an Irish Catholic family and a Jewish family living on the Lower East Side of Manhattan,[6] during the Easter–Passover season. The girl has survived the Holocaust and emigrated from Israel; the conflict was to be centered around anti-Semitism of the Catholic "Jets" towards the Jewish "Emeralds" (a name that made its way into the script as a reference).[7] Eager to write his first musical, Laurents immediately agreed. Bernstein wanted to present the material in operatic form, but Robbins and Laurents resisted the suggestion. They described the project as "lyric theater", and Laurents wrote a first draft he called East Side Story. Only after he completed it did the group realize it was little more than a musicalization of themes that had already been covered in plays like Abie's Irish Rose. When he opted to drop out, the three men went their separate ways, and the piece was shelved for almost five years.

THE 1619 PROJECT GOT SOME THINGS RIGHT Did a Fear of Slave Revolts Drive American Independence?

See the article, in the NYT, of all places, July 4, 2016, Robert Parkinson.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/did-a-fear-of-slave-revolts-drive-american-independence.html

I would go with him, over Jake Silverstein's 1619 Project equivocations.

The colonists blamed the King, specifically Jefferson blamed the King, in drafting the Declaration, for originally foisting slavery on the unwitting colonists, though it didn't make the cut. 

What a bunch of utter reeking bullshit. The colonists themselves had taken into ports, and trafficked in, slaves from slave traders, and from pirate prizes, whether the King had allowed them to or not.

Yellow Creek Massacre, Wikipedia, is also fun reading, re indians; 'America's "Heart of Darkness"', Parkinson.

Ethiopian Regiment, Wikipedia; Battle of Kemp's Landing; Battle of Great Bridge; Colonel Tye; Black Pioneers; African Americans in the Revolutionary War; Franco-American Alliance


Take a look at Allison, Before 1776. The Teaching Company. The fricking colonists had been supposed to keep their sorry asses within colonial areas. They tended never to do that. It wasn't, of course, a guarantee of their safety, but what was the alternative.

Jefferson's rough draft:

INTRODUCTION

Nowhere were the novel, and transcendental, implications of the Declaration so visible as in Jefferson’s attempt to include a denunciation of slavery. The Second Continental Congress received a draft of the Declaration from Jefferson that made the British rejection of the petition submitted by the First Continental Congress to end the slave trade one of the grounds for severing ties. However, in order not to offend the sensibilities of the delegates from Georgia and South Carolina, the Congress elected to omit Jefferson’s denunciation of slavery from the final declaration. As Jefferson’s notes (below) report, northern delegates also smarted under the censure of slavery because “tho’ their people have very few slaves themselves yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others.” We suggest that the inclusion of such an indictment would have had a profound impact on the continuing American conversation about rights.

In Jefferson’s notes on the debate in Congress over the Declaration, he gives a short account of how his draft of the Declaration was amended, afterwards recopying that first draft to show what he originally proposed. This memoir is found in the nine-volume collection, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, edited by H. A. Washington (New York: John C. Riker, 1853), which was authorized for publication in 1853 by Congress. We have relied on that edition here, including Jefferson’s explanatory note, and underlining, as Jefferson did, the parts of the Declaration deleted by Congress. While Jefferson’s original draft relegated the parts inserted by Congress to the margin, we italicize them and place them within brackets in the body of the text.

---

THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, EDITED BY H. A. WASHINGTON (NEW YORK: JOHN C. RIKER, 1853).

---

Congress proceeded the same day to consider the Declaration of Independence, which had been reported and lain on the table the Friday preceding, and on Monday referred to a committee of the whole. The pusillanimous idea that we had friends in England worth keeping terms with, still haunted the minds of many. For this reason, those passages which conveyed censures on the people of England were struck out, lest they should give them offence. The clause too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to[1] South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe, felt a little tender under those censures; for though their people have very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others. The debates, having taken up the greater parts of the 2d, 3d, and 4th days of July, were, in the evening of the last, closed; the Declaration was reported by the committee, agreed to by the House, and signed by every member present, except Mr. Dickinson.[2] As the sentiments of men are known not only by what they receive, but what they reject also, I will state the form of the Declaration as originally reported. The parts struck out by Congress shall be distinguished by a black line drawn under them; and those inserted by them shall be placed in the margin or in a concurrent column(s).

A Declaration by the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with {certain}
inherent and inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations,
begun at a distinguished period and pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to {alter}
expunge their former systems of government. The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of [repeated]
unremitting injuries and usurpations,
among which appears no solitary fact to contradict the uniform tenor of the rest but all have [all having] in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world
for the truth of which we pledge a faith yet unsullied by falsehood.

He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and, when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to the tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly
and continually for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time after such dissolutions to cause others to be elected, whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise, the state remaining, in the meantime, exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has {obstructed}
suffered the administration of justice
totally to cease in some of these states {by} refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made
our judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices
by a self assumed power and sent hither swarms of new officers to harass our people and eat our their substance.

He has kept among us in times of peace standing armies
and ships of war without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the military independent of, and superior to, the civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitutions and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation for quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; for protecting them by a mock trial from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us [in many cases] of the benefits of trial by jury; for transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offences; for abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province,[3] establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these [colonies]
states; for taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; for suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here {by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.}
withdrawing his governors, and declaring us our of his allegiance and protection.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy {scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally} unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has {excited domestic insurrections among us, and has} endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions of
existence.

He has incited treasonable insurrections of our fellow citizens, with the allurements of forfeiture and confiscation of our property.

He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of INFIDEL powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die,[4] he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he also obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed against the LIBERTIES of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the LIVES of another.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injuries. A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a [free] people
who mean to be free. Future ages will scarcely believe that the hardiness of one man adventured, within the short compass of twelve years only, to lay a foundation so broad and so undisguised for tyranny over a people fostered and fixed in principle of freedom.

Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend {an unwarrantable} a jurisdiction over {us}
these our states. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here,
no one of which could warrant so strange a pretension: that these were effected at the expense of our own blood and treasure, unassisted by the wealth or the strength of Great Britain: that in constituting indeed our several forms of government, we had adopted one common king, thereby laying a foundation for perpetual league and amity with them: but that submission to their parliament was no part of our constitution, nor ever in idea, if history may be credited: and, we {have} appealed to their native justice and magnanimity and {we have conjured them by}
as well as to the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations which {would inevitably}
were likely to interrupt our connection and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity,
 and when occasions have been given them, by the regular course of their laws, of removing from their councils the disturbers of our harmony, they have, by their free election, re-established them in power. At this very time too, they are permitting their chief magistrate to send over not only soldiers of our common blood, but Scotch and foreign mercenaries to invade and destroy us. These facts have given the last stab to agonizing affection, and manly spirit bids us to renounce for ever these unfeeling brethren. We must endeavor to forget our former love for them, and to hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends. We might have been a free and a great people together; but a communication of grandeur and of freedom, it seems, is below their dignity. Be it so, since they will have it. The road to happiness and to glory is open to us too. We will tread it apart from them, and {We must therefore} acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our
eternal separation {and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.}
!

EDITOR: THE TWO FINAL PARAGRAPHS, IN THEIR ORIGINAL AND AMENDED FORMS, WERE PLACED NEXT TO EACH OTHER IN H. A. WASHINGTON’S EDITION: THE ORIGINAL DRAFT APPEARED IN A LEFT HAND COLUMN, AND THE AMENDED AND FINAL VERSION WERE PLACED IN A RIGHT HAND COLUMN.

Jefferson’s Original Draft:

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America in General Congress assembled, do in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these
states reject and renounce all allegiance and subjection to the kings of Great Britain and all others who may hereafter claim by, through or under them; we utterly dissolve all political connection which may heretofore have subsisted between us and the people or parliament of Great Britain: and finally we do assert and declare these colonies to be free and independent states, and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.

And for the support of this declaration, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.

The Amended and Final Version:

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America in General Congress assembled, appealing to the supreme judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.

And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.

MISTAKING BEAUTY FOR TRUTH IS HE TALKING ABOUT THEY? THEM?

CLASSIC RE MANJOO

Thursday, November 7, 2019

OK BILLIONAIRE OK BOOMER OK WHITEY OK BLACKIE OK MULATTO OK CHINK OK HINDU OK ROOSKIE OK FARHAD MANJOO OK NYT

OK LGBT OK WOMEN OK WHITE MEN OK HINDU MEN OK ASIAN MEN OK POOR PEOPLE OK WESTERN CIVILIZATION HINDU CIV ASIAN CIV ORTHODOX OK JAPANESE CULTURE

WHY SINGLE OUT?

Manjoo has a lot of postmodern multicultural baggage:

Manjoo was born in South Africa in 1978 to a family with ancestral roots in India. 

A cisgender man, Manjoo prefers to be referred to with singular they pronouns.
In September 2013, Manjoo joined The Wall Street Journal as a technology columnist.[1] 
Their final column for Slate, in which they urged men to wear makeup, was published on September 20.[6] 
They later moved to The New York Times. 
They are the author of the book True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society

This guy is a walking Amherst Common Language Guide Multiculturalist Fallacy poster child.

The Manjoo Fallacy. 

He has thrown off the veneer of deference, and is unconstrained by inherited identities or allegiances.....

"Individualism is a word recently coined to express a new idea.  Our fathers only knew about egoism....Individualism is a calm and considered feeling which disposes each citizen to isolate himself from the mass of his fellows and withdraw into the circle of his family and friends....Individualism is of democratic origin and threatens to grow as conditions get more equal...aristocratic institutions have the effect of linking each man closely with several of his fellows....Aristocracy links everybody, from peasant to king, in one long chain.  Democracy breaks the chain and frees each link." Tocqueville, v2 pt 2 ch 2

LEONHARDT SMOKE HIM OUT THINK NOW THE 1619 PROJECT

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

LIBERACE HAMMERS HOME NYT ONLY ANTI WHITE RACISM WHY NOT ANTI ANY RACE?

Why not smoke Liberace's lieo NYT globalist (anti nationalist, but Brooks' brand of nationalism is globalism in disguise) anti race, unirace, unrace in general, out?

Let's smoke him out:

Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?

Why not Chinese incredible yellow racism? They consider ethnic Chinese Chinese, anywhere in the world, and forever!

Why Not Japanese or Korean or Vietnamese racisms? Ain't there a lot of em!

Why not pan Slavic racism and ethnocentrism?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?

Why not Mesoamerica Indian racism, spreading North now?

Why not Hindu racism?

Why not especially Israeli religious and blood racism?

Why not?
As Liberace now regularly says, 
"Why not open up the conversation?"

Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.

Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.

DUAL WHIG LIBERAL ZOMBIE PIROUETTE

Smoot Hawley was no less the cause of the Great Depression than globalization has been inevitable.

In each case, political interpretations and agendas have driven economic experts' analyses, rather than the other way around.

On a Whig Postmodern Interpretation of History, that makes them only more true, and more beautiful, more corroborated, as analyses, rather than less.

Call this a Whig Multidisciplinary Crosscheck!

I will give you another example from

David Reich's book.

When American anthropologists, sociologists, biologists, and others, give other liberal racial difference deniers their imprimatur, and research like Reich's and Wade's the raspberry, that is a Whig Multidisciplinary Crosscheck. Wade, p. 121, Reich Ch 10, 11, see also p 249.

What has tended to happen, however, over and over, is that, later, contrary hard scientific findings or revisionist historical material either pile up over time or even rather suddenly emerge. The latter has been what happened in genetics recently.

CHINA BASHING DOES ANYONE RECALL JAPAN BASHING? DEJA VU

GRETA THUNBERG HIRES KRUGMAN TO MANAGE THE ECONOMICS OF GLOBAL WARMING

See the Arguing With Zombies.

He thinks his most important issue area now perhaps should be global warming.....Krugman Gone Greta.

I think Thomas L Friedman may feel in his heart of hearts more or less the same way now too.

No need for a hamfisted blunt instrument, old econ school, beauty over truth, Mickey Mouse Al Gore Fallacy Carbon Tax.  Lot of other nimble entrepreneurial econ policy options, but always always keep that globalization juggernaut expanding.

Trust me, Green New Deal Economics is only the biggest and latest liberal economists' chimera. Think of it as a New Liberal Zombie in the making. 

America is, after all, the home of bi partisan economics killing off the environment through global market capitalism booming the less developed world. 

Greta really should call him out, (not hire him), and call all economists out, as she has done many others now already in politics. 

Krugman's specialty as an economist was global trade, after all.......He wasn't there back then to throttle it on behalf of anyone's environment. 

He probably did not even say things back then like regulating against big gas guzzlers would have been good policy.

IT HAD BEEN UNDER WAY A LONG TIME BUT I HAD NOT KNOWN IN 2016

Especially N Italy.

We had jammed Turkish Muslim guest workers up Germany's unwilling ass in the late 60s.

Friday, September 30, 2016

EUROPEANS NEED A BIG INUNDATION OF CHINESE ON TOP OF THE MUSLIMS

to really smell the coffee.

CLASSIC ROOSKIE SPOOK HONEY TRAP ON AUSTRIA

WIKIPEDIA: honeypot

NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL

The Constitution does not expressly assign the vice presidency to any one branch, causing a dispute among scholars about which branch of government the office belongs to: 1) the executive branch; 2) the legislative branch; 3) both; or 4) neither.

BIDEN TERRI GROSS Chat

How many was it Joe? Give me the real numbers.
Terri, I probably kissed and fondled ten thousand women in my long political career.
Did you discriminate?
No I kissed and fondled women of any age or color.
Thank you.

BIDEN A NYT WHITEFACE TOM

Tuesday, May 26, 2020

BIDEN GETS CHARLES M BLOW JOB STAY AT HOME ADVICE

Monday, May 18, 2020

NYT JOHN WATERS' AUDIENCE WHITEFACE GOOD BLACKFACE BAD DYLAN UGLY

NYT dealing the race cards deck every week.

Sunday, May 17, 2020

WHITEFACE THE QUINTESSENTIAL NYT AMERICAN NEGRO WHITE NYT STOOGES

The NYT left, liberal, pro globalist Christian or Jew anti Israel stooges are as white as their Orthodox Jewish Evangelical Christian pro Israel stooges.

Take your pick.        
They're both spectrums of White NYT Stooges.

Nothing made the NYT madder than having Trump try to insert a REPUBLICAN wedgie into the derriere of NYT STOOGEDOM!