NEGROES MIGRATING TO OFFWHITE WEST FROM AFRICA WITH WHITE HELP AT OVER 70,000 A YEAR

Richard Dowden, Wade, p. 176.

Dowden is an apostle that the pathetic state of Africa is the result of Western imposed history.

What an idiot.

Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere, are backward because of probable long developing genetic backwardness, not at all because of Western domination, imperialism, slavery, or oppression. See Wade, p. 177

Why not reprise this great old rant with Rupert Chapman Middle East summary:

Sunday, June 1, 2014 

RUFUS FEARS THE MIDDLE EAST THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRES RUPERT CHAPMAN COMMENT 

"Stimulating and thought provoking as per usual! I have only one comment, which is on the Middle East, which is my own specialization. The situation today in the Middle East is precisely the same as it has been for the last 5,000 years. I have, for many years, referred to it as either 'the 5,000 year war', or as 'stable instability'. To explain what I mean, some 5,000 years ago the Stela of the Vultures is the earliest record of a war - between the Sumerians, in what is today southern Iraq, and the Elamites, in what is today southern Iran. In Iraq itself, for the last 5,000 years there has been tension, and frequently open warfare, between the south, Sumer/Babylonia, and the north, Assyria. The mountains of the northeast have always been a separate culture area, as they are with the Kurds (known there since at least the 4th century A.D.) today, at war with the powers in the plains. The second great enemy of the Assyrians, after the Elamites and the Persians, was the kingdom of Urartu in what is now eastern Turkey, later the independent kingdom of Armenia. In the heyday of Sumerian culture, between 3500 and 2000 B.C., the Sumerians had colonies along the Middle Euphrates in what is today Syria. The Syrians and the Mesopotamians traded and intermittently fought wars against each other. Syria itself has been a single culture, east of the mountains which mark the northern extension of the Great Rift Valley along the Mediterranean Coast, but never a unified country until the French created one. War between the Syrian city-states was endemic throughout all periods of antiquity when they were not under the control of some external power. The Mediterranean Coastal Region was always culturally separate from Inland Syria, and always an economic trading culture between the great powers which surrounded it. Further south, what is today Israel and the West Bank was always either at war with Transjordan, or in an uneasy peace, and likewise in relation to Syria and what is now Lebanon, and to Egypt, the nearest great power, and the dominant culture. What keeps all of these relations of conflict and limited co-operation in place is, to me, one of the most interesting unasked, and, therefore, unanswered questions of historical studies." R CHAPMAN

The Old Testament claims that the Egyptians enslaved the Hebrews, who had previously swung, back with Adam, across and around Mesopotamia to Israel, then later, down in Egypt ( The Deep Deep South : Africa).

Doubtless, these Egyptians (Egyptians already were mulattoes) interbred with those Hebrews long before Moses liberated them to the so called Promised Land.

Moses had, after all, married a Cushite woman, a negro Midianite, Zipporah. Or is this merely a slander of Moses by the Aaronid priesthood? You decide.

Muslims, Islam, Jews, Palestinians, very, very mulatto....

The Sociology of Philosophies, Randall Collins, very prominent sociologist, in a position to know the details, trust me (I read the entire 1,000 plus pages), rhapsodized about how wonderfully and pacifically negroes and Muslims had long and unproblematically intermixed over the centuries and millenia in the Near East, implicitly contrasting it with the modern American experience since The Lincoln Shock. 

Collins, of course, doesn't get into how non pacific, how problematic, Moses' marriage to Zipporah had been apparently, probably both among the Hebrews and among the Midianites!  Just smooth Middle Eastern sailing, to listen to Collins.

I am certain that the incorporation of white sex slaves into Islam was equally politically unproblematic (from Collins' point of view, pace Mozart), although cat fights of color in the Seraglio would seldom have been widely reported, would they?

The West Side Story story changed over time:

In 1947, Jerome Robbins approached Leonard Bernstein and Arthur Laurents about collaborating on a contemporary musical adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. He proposed that the plot focus on the conflict between an Irish Catholic family and a Jewish family living on the Lower East Side of Manhattan,[6] during the Easter–Passover season. The girl has survived the Holocaust and emigrated from Israel; the conflict was to be centered around anti-Semitism of the Catholic "Jets" towards the Jewish "Emeralds" (a name that made its way into the script as a reference).[7] Eager to write his first musical, Laurents immediately agreed. Bernstein wanted to present the material in operatic form, but Robbins and Laurents resisted the suggestion. They described the project as "lyric theater", and Laurents wrote a first draft he called East Side Story. Only after he completed it did the group realize it was little more than a musicalization of themes that had already been covered in plays like Abie's Irish Rose. When he opted to drop out, the three men went their separate ways, and the piece was shelved for almost five years.