In all fairness, if I am also guilty of a historian's fallacy, why not call it The Tory Interpretation of History, based on a monograph not yet written, although I haven't yet done the research to confirm its nonexistence.
One thing is clear: it is by neither Schama nor Chang.
Another thing is that I haven't yet decided how to put the nature of this fallacy into words, yet I know that I am guilty.
Video reference: Yes, Minister, "The Moral Dimension"
Another thing is that I haven't yet decided how to put the nature of this fallacy into words, yet I know that I am guilty.
Video reference: Yes, Minister, "The Moral Dimension"
No comments:
Post a Comment