AMERICANS LIKE DAVID BROOKS LOVE TO THINK THEY NOW HAVE A MERITOCRACY

Cf: prior post: DECLINE ANOTHER LITTLE TOPIC

I want to simplify this issue for you.

Question: How can you really have such a thing as a spoils system meritocracy?

SPOILS SYSTEM MERITOCRACY

Here's a prior post from 2016:

Saturday, July 30, 2016

RE NYT TRUMP AND ALLIES

"... the regional and domestic instability set in motion by abrupt American policy changes..."

This is not something new with Trump.

The same kinds of criticisms were leveled at the French republic by the powers after 1815, and for very similar very good reasons.  

This is how America has always conducted foreign policy. 

This is also, incidentally, how trade treaties are negotiated. 

It is how its system has required it to do so.

Terms search: Kennan, ambassador, etc.

Here is a post from a while back:

Here is Kennan, re our Ambassadors, and also, I think, our diplomats, in general, here:
'FLASHBACKS'

"...ambassador to Moscow. The assignment has nothing to do with Soviet - American relations. The present ambassador, it seems, is leaving.  It is the election year of 1952. For purely domestic political reasons, the administration is afraid to leave the post vacant.  Foreign policy -- policy toward the Soviet Union -- plays no part in the decision.  It never occurs to people in the administration that the position of American ambassador to Moscow has anything to do with policy.  They don't really know, to tell the truth, what an ambassador is for...."  

"They don't really know, to tell the truth, what an 

ambassador is for...." 



Appointments, from what I can see, have most often 

been bones thrown to important presidential campaign 

contributors. That is not what even someone like David 

Brooks would call, in a sober moment, a meritocratic 

system.