"Professor
Great very interesting post.
Elections and voting, and Krugman and brooks in one short essay.
For me, Krugman and Brooks are swirling dervishes, very difficult to pin down, article by article. They each have written books, so that makes it a little easier. I read one or two of Krugman's, couldn't get through even one of Brooks'.
My own view is that Brooks' so called nationalism is fully as sham as Krugman's ostensible concern, ostensibly Keynesian, for the so called American economy.
I have, over the years, commented on both.
Your article prompted yet some more remarks.
The proof of liberalism for the so called common man was supposedly in the pudding.
Now that that pudding has grown thin, different stories are being wound by its apologists for why that should have now somehow become the case.
All the best"
Terms search, also, this blog: pudding
No comments:
Post a Comment