You can't be white anymore, especially white male, but all white women are also tarred with the same brush, believe me, baby, whether they like it or not.
Same with Uncle Aunt Toms (eg Ferguson's Wife, triple whammie: black, Muslim, Aunt Tom, woman), in the globaliberal jungle.
Friday, February 16, 2018
DK POST MY COMMENT
"Today much of the left believes in a world where virtue or the lack of it is defined by skin color, gender, and sexual orientation." DK
I would go, and have gone, a little further, perhaps too far, in this sort of analysis of globalist leftism:
The good skin color is a blend where no race is distinct, the good gender is at best ambivalent, the good sexual orientation multivalent.
I would go, and have gone, a little further, perhaps too far, in this sort of analysis of globalist leftism:
The good skin color is a blend where no race is distinct, the good gender is at best ambivalent, the good sexual orientation multivalent.
This is an old post of mine on multiculturalism and where it has led: Wednesday, April 5, 2017
LET ME EXPLAIN THIS FURTHER RACE RELIGION CIVILIZATION
See this prior post:
RACIST UNIRACIALISM UNIRELIGIONISM GLOBALISM MELTINGPOTISM
Where to begin? Once you challenge the very notion of racial differences being a natural, or neutral, even an inherently good thing, you come up against other related organizing principles for societies, such as religion, government, and civilization.
Separating church from state, fallout from The Reformation Fallacy, has turned out to be another thin wedge of a broader Western assault on social and political reality as it had always been.
Separating church from state, was then, eventually, only in the later 19th Century and only in the West, combined with a completely new, and quite radical, uniracialism, call it the racial and political brotherhood of man, so to speak, into a powerful new multidimensional globalist vision, quite apart from the economic globalism of Smithist laissez faire, already taking over in the West since the late 18th Century, which also played right into globalism.
Sunday, February 26, 2017
RE RACIST UNIRACIALISM THE BROTHERHOOD OF MAN
See this post: RACIST UNIRACIALISM UNIRELIGIONISM GLOBALISM MELTINGPOTISM
What has happened, especially in the US, is that appeals to a distinct civilizational ideal, even frankly a lost one, or civilizational political institutions, or nationalistic identifications, based in part on an overarching civilizational membership, and other related or even distinct political positions, are immediately converted, reduced, obfuscated, and labeled, here, as all different species of an underlying racism.
If you're a nationalist, well then you must be a fascist. If you're a fascist, well then of course you must be a racist. Similarly for Western Civilizationalists, Atlanticists, so called populists, anarchists, even civil libertarians, etc.
If you're a nationalist, well then you must be a fascist. If you're a fascist, well then of course you must be a racist. Similarly for Western Civilizationalists, Atlanticists, so called populists, anarchists, even civil libertarians, etc.
Imperialism is sometimes thrown in, but it is a little hard to accuse Americans, generally, of being imperialists as such, racist or not, in the old sense, although there may actually be some imperialist racist Americans here. Yet, imperialists generally are of course as a group tarred with the brush of racism, and have been for centuries now.
Nowadays they, most Americans, have all been brainwashed by ideological methods long in place to classify everyone here as either a good globalist or a bad racist, under the liberal international economic order.
They break this down further into either good liberal or conservative anti racist globalists; or as bad, racist, anti globalists, whether they are actually merely nationalists, populists, isolationists, anarchists, civil libertarians, civilizationalist, whatever, or even actually correctly as a true and strictly speaking, say, white racialists.
There are, of course, many so called good globalists, of all kinds, who actually harbor racialist or other preferences mentioned above of one kind or another, but their overarching moniker of good globalism frees them of this hidden taint, unless somehow their true views of one stripe or another, not necessarily even racist views technically, are found out.
There are also many non globalists who have had their particular non globalist views called merely racist by globalists for so long that they now believe that their views, whichever they might happen actually to be, must be, after all, in fact mainly racist. Sort of a self fulfilling classification. Like calling someone a nigger for so long, he really knows he's a nigger now and calls himself one.
There are also many non globalists who have had their particular non globalist views called merely racist by globalists for so long that they now believe that their views, whichever they might happen actually to be, must be, after all, in fact mainly racist. Sort of a self fulfilling classification. Like calling someone a nigger for so long, he really knows he's a nigger now and calls himself one.
I want to get to the implications, for religion, in a subsequent post.
No comments:
Post a Comment