How could he know, in advance, how an Obama appointee would have voted in the future, unless one assumes that a judicial decision is normally made on strictly party lines?
Well then, it is the rule of a party that Liberace espouses, and sour grapes for being the losing one.
Nothing illegal about Republicans blocking Obama appointees. Politics as usual here.
Not a good thing, either way, but it is your government, baby!
Question: What does the rule of law have to do with political parties here?
Answer: Nothing.
If justices rule along party lines, how is that the so called rule of law?
That is the rule of a faux, unelected, unacknowledged, unconstitutional, traitor, factional aristocracy.
Leonarderace, Simon Says NYT Rule of Law.
Kitty Genovese: NYT Simon Says classic.
If justices rule along party lines, how is that the so called rule of law?
That is the rule of a faux, unelected, unacknowledged, unconstitutional, traitor, factional aristocracy.
Leonarderace, Simon Says NYT Rule of Law.
Kitty Genovese: NYT Simon Says classic.
No comments:
Post a Comment