Why protect muckraking if you don't have to?
Contrary to what Professor Kaiser or Justice Black have asserted, their mission is not to protect the people at all whatsoever.
Contrary to what Professor Kaiser or Justice Black have asserted, their mission is not to protect the people at all whatsoever.
Experience has shown that tort remedies against them are inadequate and easily defeated.
The relentless hounding of celebrities has long been a locus classicus of free press free speech abuse, a right to privacy for them a chimera, merely on the hollow pretext that these people are public figures.
My own view is that the press should be reined in hard.
Let's face it: under the present circumstances of the degenerate self serving and corrupt media, what do you have now to lose?
Princess Diana, after all, was killed in a wanton skirmish with a degenerate attack dog free press wolf pack of legally unrestrained papparazi.
The limousine should have been equipped with rifles, and these people picked off, on their cycles, as they neared the vehicle.
You can quote me.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser, with his eulogy to Justice Black, whose views give license to all of this excessive and unrestrained nonsense, will weigh in. Drew Pearson, one of his heroes, after all.
terms search: Drew Pearson, Drew Pearson Fallacy, Lorch, Kitty Genovese, Bobbitt
See eg:
Princess Diana, after all, was killed in a wanton skirmish with a degenerate attack dog free press wolf pack of legally unrestrained papparazi.
The limousine should have been equipped with rifles, and these people picked off, on their cycles, as they neared the vehicle.
You can quote me.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser, with his eulogy to Justice Black, whose views give license to all of this excessive and unrestrained nonsense, will weigh in. Drew Pearson, one of his heroes, after all.
terms search: Drew Pearson, Drew Pearson Fallacy, Lorch, Kitty Genovese, Bobbitt
See eg:
Saturday, November 11, 2017
RE SHIELD OF ACHILLES TERROR AND CONSENT AMERICAN JUSTICE NYT NEWS THE VERDICT OF HISTORY
Question: Was Kitty Genovese's neighborhood a state of terror?
Why?
Why not?
Does the concept of a state of terror make any sense?
Why?
Why not?
See the NYT article 2016, re how they had grossly exaggerated the event.
What kinds of things does that do to Bobbitt's account in Shield? Seems to me it pretty much totally queers it!
If you take a look at the Wikipedia article, queers it even more.
If you take a look at the Wikipedia article, queers it even more.
Is the NYT revelation a sudden change in the verdict of history, on the callousness of the citizens of Queens, a verdict of guilt on American urban society in general?
"Clearly, both the Times and its readers--as well as dozens of other newspapers around the country--took their obligation to stay informed about world, national and local affairs much more seriously in 1937 than they do today." DK recent post
Clearly and certainly not as truthfully, seriously, or informatively, at least by 1964, either, shall we say....
Maybe Bobbitt can address all this complicated confusion.....
Interestingly enough, re law enforcement and justice in America and in New York, is the case of Alvin Williams, who had been charged with another murder which Moseley, Genovese's killer, had actually done instead.
Moseley was actually called as a witness in Williams first trial, testified to things only the killer of that other girl could have known, and the jury was hung.
Moseley was actually called as a witness in Williams first trial, testified to things only the killer of that other girl could have known, and the jury was hung.
Did the state drop the case against Williams, and properly charge Moseley instead, based on his testimony at Williams' trial?
No!
The state re tried Williams instead, and he was convicted at his re trial of a murder which Moseley had committed, and which the state was on obvious notice that he had committed rather than Williams. The article does not say what ever happened to Williams.
You would have thought that that was a news worthy subject for the NYT back then, too!
That was actually the bigger story than Genovese, frankly, then or now, and the NYT more or less passes over it in 2016 as an aside!
Maybe Williams was electrocuted for Moseley's other murder!
This seems to be a fitting 'verdict of history' on Bobbitt's Kitty Genovese Chapter!
That was actually the bigger story than Genovese, frankly, then or now, and the NYT more or less passes over it in 2016 as an aside!
Maybe Williams was electrocuted for Moseley's other murder!
This seems to be a fitting 'verdict of history' on Bobbitt's Kitty Genovese Chapter!
No comments:
Post a Comment