Leonhardt is negro racist favoring negroes over whites.
Why then not a subset of white negro inequality, Jewish negro wealth gap reduction? That would be a Biggie!
It would be negro wealth gap racism adverse to Jews.
What, then, on Leonhardt's racist premise, is wrong with that?
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need?" Marx
That has to resonate with the NYT theme of meritocracy: You get much more of everything than everyone else based on your white or Jewish merit, then you redistribute it all away.
Does that about cover it?
What about the globalization implications?
The vast majority of the world is a world of color, not the color white.
Economists have been trying to take from the rich white man and give to the poor colored man since the 19th Century. "The greatest good for the greatest numbers."
If you are talking closing a wealth gap globally, and the NYT likes this idea too, trust me, one if Piketty's pets, you get to my favorite theme, convergence.
Terms search: convergence, average, median income per capita, expropriation, raparations, grateful.
No comments:
Post a Comment