Wednesday, October 31, 2018
LIBERACE HAMMERS HOME NYT ONLY ANTI WHITE RACISM WHY NOT ANTI ANY RACE?
Why not smoke Liberace's lieo NYT globalist (anti nationalist, but Brooks' brand of nationalism is globalism in disguise) anti race, unirace, unrace in general, out?
Let's smoke him out:
Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?
Why not Chinese incredible yellow racism? They consider ethnic Chinese Chinese, anywhere in the world, and forever!
Why Not Japanese or Korean or Vietnamese racisms? Ain't there a lot of em!
Why not pan Slavic racism and ethnocentrism?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?
Why not Mesoamerica Indian racism, spreading North now?
Why not Hindu racism?
Why not especially Israeli religious and blood racism?
Why not?
As Liberace now regularly says,
"Why not open up the conversation?"
Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.
Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.
Why not smoke Liberace's lieo NYT globalist (anti nationalist, but Brooks' brand of nationalism is globalism in disguise) anti race, unirace, unrace in general, out?
Let's smoke him out:
Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?
Let's smoke him out:
Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?
Why not Chinese incredible yellow racism? They consider ethnic Chinese Chinese, anywhere in the world, and forever!
Why Not Japanese or Korean or Vietnamese racisms? Ain't there a lot of em!
Why not pan Slavic racism and ethnocentrism?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?
Why not Mesoamerica Indian racism, spreading North now?
Why not Hindu racism?
Why not especially Israeli religious and blood racism?
Why not?
As Liberace now regularly says,
"Why not open up the conversation?"
Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.
Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.
As Liberace now regularly says,
"Why not open up the conversation?"
Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.
Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.
No comments:
Post a Comment