Steve Bannon's Speech, 6/3/19 CPDC Threat Briefing

First, let me say that much of what Bannon discusses and notes is both true and catastrophically important.

But, he tries to make out that the Chinese people are both good and pure.....without our corrupting influence on them....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txklcvjB8I8

I saw all this long before Bannon even dreamed of it.

Contrary to what he asserts, we have no fiduciary responsibility to the Chinese people. Especially not for fricking reparations for dumb and dumber shit he takes responsibility for for all of you now on Youtube.

We have no fricking responsibility to minorities whom Bannon says they persecute.

China's minorities are their fricking responsibility, not your dumb asses'.

A fiduciary pays for fucking up. if Bannon has his way, you all will be liable to the Chinese people for fucking them up!

Bannon says a hundred years from now they're going to accuse us!

He has already taken financial responsibility for your descendants today for that tab!

That means reparations for Chinese enslaving Chinese people in our name. Nothing more ridiculous can be imagined.

But that is not all: The Chinese believe we should pay for imperialism going back 200 years already, so it will be a 300 year reparations tab.

Try working that off.

How much do you think Bannon really wants to pay those bitches?

But certainly for a Hundred Year marathon, memories and actions can take a long view...Bannon is a shallow demagogue, Pillsbury's confession puts meat on the Bannon bones.

Especially interesting: NPR 500 FIRMS.
Gigging Biden for taking Chinese money.... Biden's son....WHAT AN IDIOT.

Great stuff.

We are toast, baby. Trust me.

Huntington was not above falsifying recent history himself.

Just one glaring example, ch 12 again, his discussion of civilizational conflict re China. The Clash, pb p 312 313.

'The emergence of China as the dominant power....contrary to American interests as they have been historically construed' Huntington

Nothing could be further from the truth.

He knew perfectly well this was false, much better than someone like myself.

I go with Kennan:

Kennan (1960s re 1900 ish, and later, until Mao):

"Out of all these ingredients there was brewed the curious view of China that seems to have animated American statesmanship during the war; the picture of a helpless, deserving nation, for whose virtues we alone, among the great powers, had understanding, whose interests we had to sponsor in the face of Japanese enmity and British callousness, and whose grateful support in the postwar period we could take for granted as a mainstay of the world position we hoped to occupy. China was, in fact, and on this we insisted with a most extraordinary vehemence, to be one of the future great powers--- one of what F.D.R. called the 'four world policemen'"

"In this highly subjective picture of the Chinese, there was no room for a whole series of historical and psychological realities. There was no room for the physical ruthlessness that had characterized Chinese political life generally in recent decades; for the formidable psychological and political powers of the Chinese people themselves; for the strong streak of xenophobia in their nature; for the lessons of the Boxer Rebellion; for the extraordinary exploitative talent shown by Chinese factions, at all times, in turning outside aid to domestic political advantage."

"It was this idealized view of the Chinese, rather than any illusions about the relationship between the National Government and the Chinese Communists, which was most damaging to our Far Eastern policy. We did, to be sure, underrate the depth of the antagonism between these two elements. Our memories of what had transpired in 1927 were certainly shorter (if they existed at all) than were those of Mao and Chiang and Stalin. There also seems to me to have been a certain naivete, but nothing worse, in our efforts to bring about a political compromise between these two factions, and to induce Stalin to join us in this effort....". Russia and The West Under Lenin And Stalin, p 374.