'"We continue to work with local service providers so that specific BBC content can be made directly available to our audience in China.
"The last time BBC services were blocked to this extent in China was in 2014 and we call on all parties to observe the UN Declaration of Human Rights, article 19."
Article 19 states that everybody has the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the right to receive and impart information.'
How bout Cody Wilson? Being blocked by US Judiciary.
Doesn't he have the same UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19 rights BBC now claims China is denying BBC and others similarly situated?
The BBC needs to have Cody's anarcho designs rammed up Britain's WWW ass too, it seems, based on Cody's Human Rights and the BBC's own arguments!
On July 10, 2018, it was reported that he (Cody Wilson) won his lawsuit and is furthering work on DEFCAD.
See this prior post:
The BBC needs to have Cody's anarcho designs rammed up Britain's WWW ass too, it seems, based on Cody's Human Rights and the BBC's own arguments!
On July 10, 2018, it was reported that he (Cody Wilson) won his lawsuit and is furthering work on DEFCAD.
See this prior post:
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
RE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
Under the Constitution there are no limits on this. 2nd Amendment etc.
In fact, the idea of the colonists was to put colonists on an equal footing with the Crown's standing army, which they abhorred as an unnatural abridgment of British liberties.
Why can't all wealthy, and not so wealthy, Americans protect their freedoms with ICBMs etc? Say a ICBM condo association?
The Constitution appears to condone this parity as a necessary protection against tyranny.
I will provide a citation anon.
Should the NRA seek, on principle, to repeal this legislation, which I will cite?
TITLE 18 USC Part I Ch 1138 sec 2332g
If a rich person or company pays off a state, they are immune under this code section, it appears.
You're the smart citizen, you be the judge.
In fact, the idea of the colonists was to put colonists on an equal footing with the Crown's standing army, which they abhorred as an unnatural abridgment of British liberties.
Why can't all wealthy, and not so wealthy, Americans protect their freedoms with ICBMs etc? Say a ICBM condo association?
The Constitution appears to condone this parity as a necessary protection against tyranny.
I will provide a citation anon.
Should the NRA seek, on principle, to repeal this legislation, which I will cite?
TITLE 18 USC Part I Ch 1138 sec 2332g
If a rich person or company pays off a state, they are immune under this code section, it appears.
You're the smart citizen, you be the judge.
Dylan Matthews needs to weigh in on this.
Dylan Cody: Head To Head
Dylan Cody: Head To Head
No comments:
Post a Comment