We first hypothesized, in The Paleo Enlightenment Heritage post, that modern humans invented torture, and its correlative, terror, as new social tools leaving no physical traces, both to control its own population groups, and to strike fear and disorder into archaic humans moderns habitually confronted, both Neanderthals and Denisovans.
Why not propose another hypothesis on top of that one, not too far fetched?
What if it occurred, at first, to a few modern tribes, small groups, to ally, temporarily, with an adjacent modern tribe, in an aggression into an adjacent Neanderthal or Denisovan range, strictly for the limited purpose of better killing, sharing eating the archaics, and then taking over their now empty range split between the victorious modern partners?
Let's put it this way: the archaeological evidence, yes or no, would be identical.
The genetic evidence, yes or no, would be identical, too.
Let's put it this way: the archaeological evidence, yes or no, would be identical.
The genetic evidence, yes or no, would be identical, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment