My source? The Secret World, The Queen's Agent
Thursday, May 25, 2017
RE NYT TOP RUSSIAN OFFICIALS DISCUSS HOW TO INFLUENCE TRUMP AIDES
This is all more or less what I would have expected, (apparently business as usual among politicians, diplomats, and spooks) and had predicted they would find, so far.
Flynn apparently took the position that the US being closer to Russia would help in the struggle against radical Islam, a superficially quite reasonable view.
This is, of course, a rather shortsighted and quite distorted view, however, of how we, or Europe, should look at Russian actual interests, either here, there, or elsewhere.
This is all more or less what I would have expected, (apparently business as usual among politicians, diplomats, and spooks) and had predicted they would find, so far.
Flynn apparently took the position that the US being closer to Russia would help in the struggle against radical Islam, a superficially quite reasonable view.
This is, of course, a rather shortsighted and quite distorted view, however, of how we, or Europe, should look at Russian actual interests, either here, there, or elsewhere.
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
APPARENTLY YATES WARNED FLYNN ABOUT RUSSIAN BLACKMAIL NOT ABOUT THE LOGAN ACT
Monday, May 11, 2020
SOMEONE SAW THIS OLD POST APPARENTLY RE DK'S CURRENT POST
And my comment re entrapment.
I had forgotten writing this post, back then.
Saturday, May 19, 2018
WASHINGTON POST SECRET FBI SOURCE ENTRAP THEN RATTING OUT TRUMP CAMPAIGN
I'm sure other FBI source or sources were simultaneously ratting out other candidates' campaigns.
One of the biggies of prosecutorial discretion is called entrapment. This is always a fun thing for prosecutors to do, regardless of party affiliation, or other work they should be doing.
The great thing about political entrapment is that their victims are so often unprincipled idiot politicians anyway!
Entrapping them is rather like shooting ducks in a barrel! It's not really a sport.
The FBI needs to be shut down the worst way.
One of the biggies of prosecutorial discretion is called entrapment. This is always a fun thing for prosecutors to do, regardless of party affiliation, or other work they should be doing.
The great thing about political entrapment is that their victims are so often unprincipled idiot politicians anyway!
Entrapping them is rather like shooting ducks in a barrel! It's not really a sport.
The FBI needs to be shut down the worst way.
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
RE DK CURRENT POST FLYNN AND ENTRAPMENT
Wednesday, May 1, 2019
SIMON SAYS
Monday, December 4, 2017
NYT SAYS LOGAN ACT CLEARLY APPLIES TO FLYNN AND TO ANYONE ELSE NYT CHOOSES
terms search: Logan Act
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
RE NYT DIVIDED MEDIA ON MICHAEL FLYNN
Who really cares whether the media appears to the nyt reader as divided or united?
Whose point is it, other than a media which finally, after all these decades, and centuries, knows that now the mask has been torn off for good?
The topic itself is a smokescreen for the responsibility of the media. The ' divided media ' is a faux division, for the insiders. They know, and have long known the real score.
Even if the other NYT account happens to be correct, in this case, Trump's assessment is certainly the more accurate one regarding the role, the power, and the resources, legitimate and illegitimate, of the media more in general.
It seems to me that a far better question might have been: how long had the media itself known it?
And, conversely, if they hadn't, then why had their media investigators, responsible for also knowing for weeks this juicy piece of faux muck, not already lost their pathetic jobs?
Another question lingers, for me: If Clinton or her putative staff, had also had similar conversations, or frankly any conversations, with Russian so called intelligence agents (sometimes otherwise known as diplomats), why did not the conservative muckraking thorough paced tool media establishment not disclose it already, or even first? Hello. It cannot be because they merely detest Trump! It is Clinton who would be the target, after all! It sounds to me like heads need to roll within the conservative reporting establishment as well!
The last question: assuming that they, also, knew it for weeks, just as they say Trump did, then why did they, good newspaper men eager for a fresh hot story, not disclose it at that time, when they, too, first knew it?
Dramatic effect. Also, the story gets better by acting like it was something somehow worth concealing.
Further, it gives the principals, the media victims, time to get their stories of what had happened several weeks ago garbled, not because they really had much to hide, but rather because they did not think enough of it at the time to care to micro manage the record of it even.
The only thing left to add, at this point, is that the conservative media here is, if anything, more corrupt and degenerate than the liberal one.
It seems to me that a far better question might have been: how long had the media itself known it?
And, conversely, if they hadn't, then why had their media investigators, responsible for also knowing for weeks this juicy piece of faux muck, not already lost their pathetic jobs?
Another question lingers, for me: If Clinton or her putative staff, had also had similar conversations, or frankly any conversations, with Russian so called intelligence agents (sometimes otherwise known as diplomats), why did not the conservative muckraking thorough paced tool media establishment not disclose it already, or even first? Hello. It cannot be because they merely detest Trump! It is Clinton who would be the target, after all! It sounds to me like heads need to roll within the conservative reporting establishment as well!
The last question: assuming that they, also, knew it for weeks, just as they say Trump did, then why did they, good newspaper men eager for a fresh hot story, not disclose it at that time, when they, too, first knew it?
Dramatic effect. Also, the story gets better by acting like it was something somehow worth concealing.
Further, it gives the principals, the media victims, time to get their stories of what had happened several weeks ago garbled, not because they really had much to hide, but rather because they did not think enough of it at the time to care to micro manage the record of it even.
The only thing left to add, at this point, is that the conservative media here is, if anything, more corrupt and degenerate than the liberal one.
No comments:
Post a Comment