Is returning a stone monument to Namibia, rather than to Portugal, or paying folks in Chile, or elsewhere, or giving Jews or others back things taken in WWII, or earlier, an admission of civil liability?
I think that it is.
Lawyers here literally swarmed out of the woodwork after BP admitted liability, and agreed to pay compensation without limit.
Sunday, July 30, 2017
RE ARE PRIVATE COMPANIES LIABLE IN TORT FOR CLIMATE CHANGE?
Sunday, June 29, 2014
RE BP SEEKS TO WREST BACK COMPENSATION WHY NOT FRAME IT AS A REGULATORY TAKING?
Friday, May 17, 2013
RE BP'S EXPOSURE DOWN HERE AND WHY
Only a very naive, ignorant, or very reckless, entity would have agreed to compensate businesses around here without regard to causation.
I received a solicitation from a couple of law firms, incredible, in their willingness to explain to prospective referrors how the issue of causation is apparently irrelevant, and only a colorable documentary showing of a business loss during a relevant calendar period will suffice for recovery.
Few things are easier, here, than to find experts, specialists really, to aggressively prepare the appropriate business record loss documents.
I received a solicitation from a couple of law firms, incredible, in their willingness to explain to prospective referrors how the issue of causation is apparently irrelevant, and only a colorable documentary showing of a business loss during a relevant calendar period will suffice for recovery.
Few things are easier, here, than to find experts, specialists really, to aggressively prepare the appropriate business record loss documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment