One can follow this theme in some quite illustrious works of European history, Schroeder's works particularly.
I didn't just blow this idea out of my ass....
BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
RE BLEXIT DEMOCRATS DON'T GIVE A GOOD GODDAMN ABOUT NEGROES HERE
No wonder conservative negroes are mad.
As Professor Kaiser pointed out, the Democrats had long done less than nothing for negroes.
Democrat politicians are globalists. They favor favors for foreign people of color, frankly any foreign color will do, so long it is not white, but not, not any favors at all ever for American negroes.
You can take that to the bank.
GLOBALIZATION HAS ALREADY BECOME ASIUNIFUCKATION
Americans just don't realize it yet.
See, eg, Michael Pillsbury's Confessions, The Hundred Year Marathon
Journalists like Liberace at NYT still fight over white negro race matters.... chicken shit bullshit, going forward.
Or three way chicken shit American domestic conflicts, re Ladinos, and immigration.
When they take over, Yellow Asians won't give a flying fuck about American race relations.
Take a glance at their global numbers.......................................
They'll be a whole lot more concerned with African negro encroachments, or mixing.
African negro encroachments, however, into yellow Asia are, frankly, unlikely.
Racial mixing within Africa and the subcontinent will be incredibly easy for the Chinese and other Asians to control.
See, eg, Michael Pillsbury's Confessions, The Hundred Year Marathon
Journalists like Liberace at NYT still fight over white negro race matters.... chicken shit bullshit, going forward.
Or three way chicken shit American domestic conflicts, re Ladinos, and immigration.
When they take over, Yellow Asians won't give a flying fuck about American race relations.
Take a glance at their global numbers.......................................
They'll be a whole lot more concerned with African negro encroachments, or mixing.
African negro encroachments, however, into yellow Asia are, frankly, unlikely.
Racial mixing within Africa and the subcontinent will be incredibly easy for the Chinese and other Asians to control.
RE KHASHOGGI I COULD GET THE SAUDIS OFF SCOTT FREE ON MOTION
There is no corpus delicti.
He was seen leaving the embassy.
Maybe he is now living, with another mistress, on the Costa Brava!
He was seen leaving the embassy.
Maybe he is now living, with another mistress, on the Costa Brava!
AMERICANS ARE TEARING DOWN THEIR WHITE MALE MONUMENTS BIG AND SMALL
This is what the rest of the world has been doing, baby!
LIBERACE HAMMERS HOME NYT ONLY ANTI WHITE RACISM WHY NOT ANTI ANY RACE?
Why not smoke Liberace's lieo NYT globalist (anti nationalist, but Brooks' brand of nationalism is globalism in disguise) anti race, unirace, unrace in general, out?
Let's smoke him out:
Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?
Let's smoke him out:
Why not rampant Muslim racialism and religious intolerance?
Why not Chinese incredible yellow racism? They consider ethnic Chinese Chinese, anywhere in the world, and forever!
Why Not Japanese or Korean or Vietnamese racisms? Ain't there a lot of em!
Why not pan Slavic racism and ethnocentrism?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?
Why not the new negro African anti white racism, now in full swing?
Why not Mesoamerica Indian racism, spreading North now?
Why not Hindu racism?
Why not especially Israeli religious and blood racism?
Why not?
As Liberace now regularly says,
"Why not open up the conversation?"
Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.
Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.
As Liberace now regularly says,
"Why not open up the conversation?"
Liberace and the NYT are the unwitting liberal stooges of the avalanche of different racialists of color or ethnicity or religion, all over the world, who love for organs like the NYT to run down its own white racial background and heritage while their foreign brands of race religion and ethnicity flourish in the gathering racial and cultural vacuum of the White West.
Liberace is rather like what Douglas had called, in the 1850s, Black Republicans, the one trick new party sectional ponies of abolitionism, traitors of their own race, which became crystal clear when they put freed slaves in charge of the occupied South.
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
EVEN WHAT WAS CALLED THE ANGLO AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT WAS A MISNOMER
Trust me.
Quigley called his book that, but it concealed very deep divisions on very fundamental ideas.
So, what kind of so called establishment was it, really?
Smoke and mirrors.
Wilson had given those European Imperialist bastards an anti imperialist ultimatum, in and after WWI.
We had only joined WWI to screw Europe, and only entered when Russia turned communist, which appealed to our Age of the Democratic Revolution heritage, of fomenting proletarian revolutions whenever possible.
Here was Wilson's statement, on hearing of the Russian Bolsheviki Revolution, resulting in our entering the war:
FDR then rammed it up their imperialist asses, during and after WWII.
If you want to call that an establishment, knock yourself out.
Quigley called his book that, but it concealed very deep divisions on very fundamental ideas.
So, what kind of so called establishment was it, really?
Smoke and mirrors.
Wilson had given those European Imperialist bastards an anti imperialist ultimatum, in and after WWI.
We had only joined WWI to screw Europe, and only entered when Russia turned communist, which appealed to our Age of the Democratic Revolution heritage, of fomenting proletarian revolutions whenever possible.
Here was Wilson's statement, on hearing of the Russian Bolsheviki Revolution, resulting in our entering the war:
Wilson, 1917:
"Does not every American feel that assurance has been added to our hope for the future peace of the world by the wonderful and heartening things that have been happening within the last few weeks in Russia? Russia was known by those who knew it best to have been always in fact democratic at heart, in all the vital habits of her thought, in all the imtimate relationships of her people that spoke their natural instinct, their habitual attitude towards life. The autocracy that crowned the summit of her political structure, long as it had stood and terrible as was the reality of its power, was not in fact Russian in origin, character, or purpose; and now it has been shaken off and the great, generous Russian people have been added in all their naive majesty and might to the forces that are fighting for freedom in the world, for justice, and for peace. Here is a fit partner for a league of honor."
FDR then rammed it up their imperialist asses, during and after WWII.
"...The citizens of the United States had not joined in the Second World War to prop up a system of imperial domination against which they had been the first people to revolt...." Sir Michael Howard
If you want to call that an establishment, knock yourself out.
RE PHARRELL ORDERS TRUMP TO STOP PLAYING IT I AGREE
A beautiful, perfectly constructed, but stupid shit, song.
Dittohead: Get Lucky
Dittohead: Get Lucky
THE MENU FOR ADVANCED PRIMATES IMPROV
Let's say you have bouillabaise sometime, off Park Avenue.
It is too much. Enough for two really. You're not eating for two! You're over that!
You get a doggie bag, just so as not to look quite so nouveau riche. Your doggie bag carry bag is black too!
The black theme, so as to be conspicuously inconspicuous.....(I could go on about this, at considerable length.)
So, now, what the hell do you do with it? You never cook!
Maybe you never even learned how to cook.
The fact that you never learned how to cook does not make you an aristocrat. Trust me.
Tell your cook (You have one.) to do this:
Get some arborio rice. Simmer the leftover soup, and whatever, with the rice. One part dry rice, two parts leftover liquid, plus water if needed. Check after 20 minutes.
Now you have seafood risotto!
I eat this with Spanish black beans, but I add too much cumin to the beans. And, you know, beans aren't for everyone.
It is too much. Enough for two really. You're not eating for two! You're over that!
You get a doggie bag, just so as not to look quite so nouveau riche. Your doggie bag carry bag is black too!
The black theme, so as to be conspicuously inconspicuous.....(I could go on about this, at considerable length.)
So, now, what the hell do you do with it? You never cook!
Maybe you never even learned how to cook.
The fact that you never learned how to cook does not make you an aristocrat. Trust me.
Tell your cook (You have one.) to do this:
Get some arborio rice. Simmer the leftover soup, and whatever, with the rice. One part dry rice, two parts leftover liquid, plus water if needed. Check after 20 minutes.
Now you have seafood risotto!
I eat this with Spanish black beans, but I add too much cumin to the beans. And, you know, beans aren't for everyone.
LINCOLN'S SIOUX UPRISING BUTT UGLY
Freed negroes got the vote, only in the occupied South.
Indians, considered much more human than negroes, put on reservations, or killed off.
White women denied the vote until the 20th century, 50 years after freed negroes.
That's yur America, baby.
It is one of those commonplaces of anomalous American race history that the negroes, though considered by all, especially by abolitionist whites, less human than the native Americans, were nevertheless treated both before, during, and after the Civil War better than native Americans until the late 20th Century.
In the 19th Century, native Americans on reservations were worse off in all ways than negro slaves, or than freed negroes after the Civil War.
Indians, considered much more human than negroes, put on reservations, or killed off.
White women denied the vote until the 20th century, 50 years after freed negroes.
That's yur America, baby.
It is one of those commonplaces of anomalous American race history that the negroes, though considered by all, especially by abolitionist whites, less human than the native Americans, were nevertheless treated both before, during, and after the Civil War better than native Americans until the late 20th Century.
In the 19th Century, native Americans on reservations were worse off in all ways than negro slaves, or than freed negroes after the Civil War.
LIBERACE HITS A FEW TRADITIONAL IDEOLOGY HIGH NOTES HERE
What do you think he means by the global political center, or the Establishment?
He actually calls it the global political center, or the so called establishment.
What is that thing?
Where do you think it came from?
How long has it existed?
Who created it?
You, by voting your asses off?
Who ran, and who now runs, it?
Why?
How?
With a legislature, a president, a court?
Who's in it?
Who's out?
Why?
How?
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
RE ENTRE PREENERS TO THE RESCUE RAIL TO RAIL
Makes you think of cats, preening themselves and each other.
Almost no one really qualifies; see some prior posts re those weird individuals who actually do, terms search: really erratic, rail to rail, venture capitalists, Maverick Executive, Thurston Howell, Macaire, Maverick, or simply the blob CEO.
See also BU current School of Management Magazine, I recommend especially the artice entitled "The Overconfident CEO".
You might also take a look at "BU, The Capital of Entrepreneurship".
"The Overconfident CEO": This is pop-management social science par excellence.
This article dances all around ostensible trait ineffablenesses of CEOs. A quasi pathology, really.
I would suggest, merely as a literary rather than a scientific hypothesis, that the overconfident CEO, at night, when all cats are gray, can shade over into some of the traits of The Maverick Executive, or even into the Entre Preener, or even into, Thurston Robert Macaire Howell,
or perhaps The Rooster of Roswell, even. This thing can crow.
Monday, December 27, 2010
RE KRUGMAN'S EDITORIAL NYT A FINITE WORLD A WORLD NOT FOUND IN NATURE UNPROSPERITY TRICKLING DOWN
Unfortunately, "at a fundamental level, it is about us."
The US, grew the developing world, almost singlehandedly, by strategic global market capitalism and American consumerism, as a great ideological alternative to communism, arguing that there was no domestic down side except a little dislocation of some employment at home.
That turned out, even by say the 60s, not to even be true.
Further, with respect to commodities, it has shown itself to have been a truly catastrophic strategy, developing large hungry global 'market' competitors everywhere, each of which wants more of the 'finite world', a world not found in the economists' models, a world moreover not found in nature, from its global market competitors.
Unfortunately, gradualism, of growth of a pacific, but hungry, 'global middle class', is probably not what we will be seeing, going forward, as further dislocations, not even just financial or fiscal or monetary ones, dog every regime.
We have been seeing more aggressive nationalistic regimes and civilizations. Cf. Margaret MacMillan's citation from Paris 1919, 'vicious from the moment of their birth'.
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
RE EUROSKEPTICS KRUGMAN'S EDITORIAL NYT COMPARTMENTALIZATION
It is all very nice to do, or to criticize, economically, an economic cost benefit currency analysis, very nice,
in a more or less political, social, national, and strategic, intellectual
vacuum.
What would real, rather than economic, 'skepticism' look like here?
Sunday, December 12, 2010
RE HIVE-MINDS AND KLEPTOCRATS KRUGMAN MNC BLOBALIZATION BLOG TOPIC SELLING BIG CORPORATE NEWSPAPERS
Commenting on another blog post, he poo poos the notion of the big corporation as bad actor,
fails to impugn the political system, and the bi-partisan understanding, that allowed these very powerful entities to overgrow,
and blames individual bad actors at the tops of the ones most visibly acting bad.
This is not a very helpful image, and wildly distorts what has been going on to drive globalism blobalism in such an unhelpful direction and extent.
Not that corporations themselves initiated the process of accruing too much reach and power, blobalizing everywhere, or are intrinsically bad,
but now that they're there, not very helpful to blame only certain allegedly bad imperial corporate controlling individuals (even if themselves bloblike) manipulating otherwise benevolent MNCS.
The Republicans permanently abandoned the domestic economy, as even someone like Buchanan pointed out in The Great Betrayal, when MNCs, and foreign interests, not imperial American individuals, became so influential in the 70s that there was no going back.
Buchanan's Chapter "Companies Without A Country", contains some passages, which could be multiplied many times in the literature, showing that it is not individual imperial 'bad actors', but the MNC phenomenon itself, which has been allowed to swell and take over politics.
One can find similar history in Prestowitz, Chalmers Johnson, Alfred Eckes, Jr., Gilpin, Gill, Reich, Greider, Batra, and others.
Of course, if you work for a MNC that has a subsidiary corporation that sells newspapers, it's hard to impugn the entity that pays your salary.............
Or, if you are a politician, like say Buchanan, not very popular to attack the corporate powers that be, imperial or not.
Friday, December 24, 2010
RE CHINA AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BLOBALIZATION THREE BILLION NEW ENTRE PREENER MAVERICK EXECUTIVES
For most laissez faire or property rights enthusiasts, this is just all part of a freer trade less government world we should all get used to having and be happy we have it, and have ever more of it.
(Sing "It's a Small World After All".)
But, wait a minute, intellectual property rights are property rights, and our free trade partners, China and others, ignore them forever.
What does China think of property rights, or of any rights for that matter? Think of the Wind God, Zephyr.
Just one other little 'sticky wicket' in a rapidly deteriorating politico-economic-military situation.
'Income redistribution', abroad.
See also Krugman's 'The Humbug Express' NYT editorial today:
Most Democrats have long been on this Orient Express too.
Obama Korea, for example.............................
(Dickens' antisemitism grates on me.
It is not-so-thinly concealed in Scrooge.)
Scrooge is a variation, by the way, on that weird type, The Maverick Executive, Thurston Macaire Howell, and the Entre Preener. Rail to rail.
WHY HAVE UNIONS OR WORKERS,
WHEN WE'VE GOT CHINA?
What are property rights, or Americans' 'rights',
compared to labor cheapness?
Here's a harder one, for the thinkers,
What is Truth compared to labor cheapness?
Wind.
Humbug.
CLASSIC DUSTY STAGECOACH HOLDUP SHAKEDOWN OLD WEST SOMEONE SAW
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
DUSTY STAGECOACH DESPERADO HOLDUP CARTOON
Dusty, looking like a cross between Uncle Sam and Trump, in old cowboy getup, has em out by the coach, his revolvers trained on em. They look like notables from all over the world.
Dusty: Gimme alyur valubels. I'm desprat.
One notable: Howee kno u wont shut eeneway?
Dusty: U don.
Another notable: Wad ya tink ees valbal?
Dusty: Wutevr u do, pardnr.
Third notable: U wan our hakers tu?
Dusty: nevr thot o that. Cum to thk ofit, iyl tak Snodon.
Putin: Ees no a hakr. Ees uh canary.
Dusty: I kantel uh difrnc.
Terms searched: hacked
Dusty: Gimme alyur valubels. I'm desprat.
One notable: Howee kno u wont shut eeneway?
Dusty: U don.
Another notable: Wad ya tink ees valbal?
Dusty: Wutevr u do, pardnr.
Third notable: U wan our hakers tu?
Dusty: nevr thot o that. Cum to thk ofit, iyl tak Snodon.
Putin: Ees no a hakr. Ees uh canary.
Dusty: I kantel uh difrnc.
Terms searched: hacked
Monday, October 29, 2018
MILLIONS CAME INTO THE EU ON FAKE BULGARIAN PASSPORTS BABY
What a fucking political sewer!
They were probably fucking importing spooks from everywhere! A thousand Rooskie agents poured into the EU.
Who needs IT when you can commit fraud and espionage the old fashioned way?
I once knew a guy. He worked as a physicist at Cape Kennedy.... Funny about that.
He said he came from, grew up in, Iowa, or Kansas. Doesn't matter, now, which one he said, back then. He spoke very robotic edgy very slightly slavic English, but with almost no accent, certainly no accent I had ever heard from anywhere in the Midwest.....
They were probably fucking importing spooks from everywhere! A thousand Rooskie agents poured into the EU.
Who needs IT when you can commit fraud and espionage the old fashioned way?
I once knew a guy. He worked as a physicist at Cape Kennedy.... Funny about that.
He said he came from, grew up in, Iowa, or Kansas. Doesn't matter, now, which one he said, back then. He spoke very robotic edgy very slightly slavic English, but with almost no accent, certainly no accent I had ever heard from anywhere in the Midwest.....
Sunday, April 9, 2017
THE RADICAL GLOBALIZER WANTS RACIAL CONVERGENCE AS MUCH AS ECONOMIC AND RELIGIOUS CONVERGENCE
He, already, sees these things, as essentially connected.
He is rather like the immediate abolitionists of the late 18th and 19th Centuries, which wrought so much havoc wherever they were in the West and the US.
That's a dirty little secret. Keep it just between us. It has been driven by liberal, religious, and utopian, ideologies, and mainly by big globalist business interests, as well as so called conservative Western religious interests, especially in the 20th century.
Low level Western adherents, liberal or conservative, don't really appreciate the full horrific implications of their ad hoc globalist views, zealots seldom do, but I can spell them out for you:
Every person in the world should have no religion, consider every other person in the world his brother, be dark tan in color, make about $400 a year, and be happy with this utopian state of affairs.
Every person in the world should have no religion, consider every other person in the world his brother, be dark tan in color, make about $400 a year, and be happy with this utopian state of affairs.
I SAY FIRE ON THE MEXICAN BORDER GUARDS FIRST
Then, if you kill a few hundred of these bastards, they will stay down there.
If they don't, then kill a few hundred next time.
Eventually they will get the message.
Same when the Chinese start sending them over by the thousands. They will pay off the fucking Mexicans, then run them up to the border. Mark my words.
Rooskies have to get tough or their ass will be very quickly overrun.
Whole lot more desperate Chinese than chicken shit Rooskies in Asia, baby!
If they don't, then kill a few hundred next time.
Eventually they will get the message.
Same when the Chinese start sending them over by the thousands. They will pay off the fucking Mexicans, then run them up to the border. Mark my words.
Rooskies have to get tough or their ass will be very quickly overrun.
Whole lot more desperate Chinese than chicken shit Rooskies in Asia, baby!
FACEBOOK FINDS MORE FAKE ACCOUNTS FROM IRAN
Or is it 'Iran'?
It could be from anyfuckingwhere.
The bulk right now, of views, here, are from 'Ukraine':
It could be from anyfuckingwhere.
The bulk right now, of views, here, are from 'Ukraine':
DEGENEROMICS
Friday, September 30, 2011
MARKET EVER SO GRADUALLY OVER DECADES NOW EQUILIBRATING TOWARD GLOBAL POVERTY LEVEL SAY IT ISN'T SO
Prices, wages, and profits, generally all declining, in dribs and drabs, in concert, ensemble,
over decades, toward the bottom,
commodity prices inching up now, but depression holding them back a little.
Avoiding big inflation and deflation along the way, so far,
but, hey, who cares when it's decline anyway?
Is this 'economics'?
Say it isn't so.
We have paid and will continue to pay a huge price, huge price, not just an economics thing, in booming potentially very hostile, very large, and very poor populations merely to temporarily cut costs, and boost short term profits.
term search: Steingart, never much many few, dumb dumber, etc.
over decades, toward the bottom,
commodity prices inching up now, but depression holding them back a little.
Avoiding big inflation and deflation along the way, so far,
but, hey, who cares when it's decline anyway?
Is this 'economics'?
Say it isn't so.
We have paid and will continue to pay a huge price, huge price, not just an economics thing, in booming potentially very hostile, very large, and very poor populations merely to temporarily cut costs, and boost short term profits.
term search: Steingart, never much many few, dumb dumber, etc.
Sunday, October 28, 2018
GLOBALISTS' HEARTS ARE BLEACHED OF THE LOVE OF PLACE DAVID BROOKS
BLEACHED,......... TURNED WHITE
(BAD NON COLOR!).
BROOKS SOUNDS LIKE HE HATES BLEACHED WHITE GLOBALISTS.
BUT THE REAL GLOBALIST COLOR WILL NOT BE BLEACHED WHITE AT ALL.
IT WILL BE LIGHT YELLOW BROWN, NOT WHITE.
NOT BLEACHED WHITE. ANTI WHITE.
YELLOW BROWN.
(BAD NON COLOR!).
BROOKS SOUNDS LIKE HE HATES BLEACHED WHITE GLOBALISTS.
BUT THE REAL GLOBALIST COLOR WILL NOT BE BLEACHED WHITE AT ALL.
IT WILL BE LIGHT YELLOW BROWN, NOT WHITE.
NOT BLEACHED WHITE. ANTI WHITE.
YELLOW BROWN.
GET A LOAD OF BROOKS' RECENT POSTS!
He's worse than Liberace!
The Neighborhood Is The Unit Of Change (He mimicks TLF's New Localism here. What a fucking idiot.)
The Rich White Civil War (See my other posts on Brooks on nationalism, Lincoln, globalization, etc.)
Brooks is really, at heart, surprise, a lower Manhattan localist.
But, however, surprise, he is really, at heart, an American nationalist.
(But, however, surprise, (secretly), he is still the same old Brooks globalist you have all, everywhere in the world, always known, and loved.)
Brooks is fun to follow, in a sick sort of way, because he is quite intentionally rather a swirling dervish of an editorial journalist.
Even trying to criticize him is rather like trying to shoot snipe, one of the most evasive of flying wild sport fowl.
Witness his current article, which I have tackled in several ways, not because I wanted to, but rather because the article changes ground, topic, and point of view, phrase by phrase, and sentence by sentence, as it goes along.
Brooks: Yes, I am A Snipe!
Brooks is really, at heart, surprise, a lower Manhattan localist.
But, however, surprise, he is really, at heart, an American nationalist.
(But, however, surprise, (secretly), he is still the same old Brooks globalist you have all, everywhere in the world, always known, and loved.)
Brooks is fun to follow, in a sick sort of way, because he is quite intentionally rather a swirling dervish of an editorial journalist.
Even trying to criticize him is rather like trying to shoot snipe, one of the most evasive of flying wild sport fowl.
Witness his current article, which I have tackled in several ways, not because I wanted to, but rather because the article changes ground, topic, and point of view, phrase by phrase, and sentence by sentence, as it goes along.
Brooks: Yes, I am A Snipe!
SEE VENONA PAPERS RE HARRY HOPKINS
Small wonder that Akhmerov, in a lecture in Moscow in the early 1960s, identified Hopkins by name as "the most important of all Soviet wartime agents in the United States."
ONE MORAL OF DK'S LAST POST MATTEOTTI CIANFARRA
It just doesn't pay to be either a utopian globalist socialist activist, or an unsavory Italian journalist, Cianfarra.
George Seldes, the actual Chicago Tribune corrrespondent expelled from Italy, had been influenced by Cianfarra.
David F Schmitz, Between the Scylla of Reaction and the Charybdis of Bolshevism: Woodrow Wilson and Italy The United States And Fascist Italy, 1922-1940, fn 61.
it appears from the above that Seldes, the Chicago Tribune columnist, may have ratted out his seedy source, before being expelled from Italy, at the demand of his own government.
it appears from the above that Seldes, the Chicago Tribune columnist, may have ratted out his seedy source, before being expelled from Italy, at the demand of his own government.
Saturday, October 27, 2018
AGAINST ECONOMIC NATIONALISM MR MORE FREE TRADE BROOKS
"You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE). America is diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE); if you don’t love diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE), you are not an American nationalist." DB
DIALOGUE TWO WHITEFACE HITLERS MEET AT A HALLOWEEN BALL
I believe in nationalism and diversity.
So do I.
Two blackface Stalins meet at the same ball:
I believe in communism and diversity.
So do I.
And so on.....one blackface one whiteface.....
And so on,...one Chinaface one Japanface( both negroes under the skin)
I believe in nationalism and communism and diversity.
So do I.
Meghan Kelly at Halloween ball, in blackface:
I believe in Facebook.
So do I.
Two blackface Stalins meet at the same ball:
I believe in communism and diversity.
So do I.
And so on.....one blackface one whiteface.....
And so on,...one Chinaface one Japanface( both negroes under the skin)
I believe in nationalism and communism and diversity.
So do I.
Meghan Kelly at Halloween ball, in blackface:
I believe in Facebook.
W: THESE PRINCIPLES ARE RIGHT FOR ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE!
American nationalism has been one of the great joys, comforts and motivators of my life. I don’t know how anybody can live without it. DB
I don’t know how anybody can live without it............................
He means, trust me, anybody, anywhere.
I don’t know how anybody can live without it............................
He means, trust me, anybody, anywhere.
THE SPIRIT OF AMERICAN NATIONALISM IS IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE
If you look at the Milner Group and their creed, especially the later ones, eg Lionel Curtis, it is the same.
The British Empire would have to die to be reborn as The World.
The British Empire would have to die to be reborn as The World.
HE IS INTENTIONALLY CONFUSING NATIONALISM WITH GLOBALISM HERE
You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity. America is diversity; if you don’t love diversity, you are not an American nationalist.
LINCOLN THE ANTI NATIONALIST
"...You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another — class against class, race against race, tribe against tribe...." DB
You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another,... section against section.
Boomerbuster
The anti zero-sum society Brooks describes is a society without borders, the one whose citizens become traitors to their nation state by joining.
This post is dedicated to Lester Thurow, another great globalist economist.
You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another,... section against section.
Boomerbuster
The anti zero-sum society Brooks describes is a society without borders, the one whose citizens become traitors to their nation state by joining.
This post is dedicated to Lester Thurow, another great globalist economist.
BROOKS' FAUX NATIONALISM IS THREATENED BY INDIVIDUALISM AND GLOBALISM
As well as by faux nationalists, which is how he characterizes Trump. (I already pointed out that Lincoln was also a faux nationalist....)
The greatest threats, he says, come from those who also, (paradoxically, illogically,) claim to be nationalists, but are not (He means fascists.)
David Brooks, of what you accuse Trump, right or wrong, you yourself are, in spades, a relentless globalist, masquerading, in the pages of the NYT, as a new kind, a kinder gentler, kind, of nationalist.
The greatest threats, he says, come from those who also, (paradoxically, illogically,) claim to be nationalists, but are not (He means fascists.)
David Brooks, of what you accuse Trump, right or wrong, you yourself are, in spades, a relentless globalist, masquerading, in the pages of the NYT, as a new kind, a kinder gentler, kind, of nationalist.
Friday, October 26, 2018
IS CLASSICAL LIBERALISM CONSERVATIVE? YORAM HAZONY
The Brooks story book.
What is 'classical liberalism'?
LET'S JUST SAY WHAT BROOKS' NATIONALISM IS: YORAM HAZONY NATIONALISM
Not lower Manhattan localism, masquerading as nationalism.
Yoram Hazony nationalism......Trust me.
He says as much in his article....read it.
Yoram Hazony, New York: Basic Books, The Virtue of Nationalism, 2018
The nod to Renan, the Christian stooge apologist, and then Hazony, the real Orthodox Jewish power behind Brooks' NYT Christian Renanian stooges.
Yoram Hazony nationalism......Trust me.
He says as much in his article....read it.
Yoram Hazony, New York: Basic Books, The Virtue of Nationalism, 2018
The nod to Renan, the Christian stooge apologist, and then Hazony, the real Orthodox Jewish power behind Brooks' NYT Christian Renanian stooges.
BROOKS' NOT JUST BUT IT IS SIMON SAYS NATIONALISM
"What does this national attachment feel like? It feels a bit like any other kind of love — a romantic love, or a love between friends. It is not one thing that you love but the confluence of a hundred things. Yes, it is the beauty of the Rockies, but it is not just the land. It is the Declaration of Independence, but not just the creed. It’s winning World War II and Silicon Valley, but it is not just the accomplishments. It is the craziness, the diversity, our particular brand of madness."
What would Simon Brooks Says say American nationalism is not?
He doesn't say........................................................................
Since, as Brooks admits, almost no Americans are actually nationalists (5%), this must include a hell of a lot........................
What would Simon Brooks Says say American nationalism is not?
He doesn't say........................................................................
Since, as Brooks admits, almost no Americans are actually nationalists (5%), this must include a hell of a lot........................
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
RE THE DEFINING PARTNERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY MISE EN SCENE WEST SIDE STORY G20
We show an elegant ballroom.
The President and Premier Singh are dancing the tango together, both in suits.
However, the President is the male partner for this particularly dramatic moment in the dance.
There are one or two other identifiable pairs on the dance floor, looking on, with various expressions of emotion.
There are about G20 individuals on the side lines.These should be arrayed in groups or cliques based on ethnic, national, or racial characteristics. Think West Side Story.
Certain groups can be snapping their fingers, facing one direction, etc., in unison........
They eye each other with suspicion, etc., etc.
The caption above
EAST SIDE STORY
The caption below
The Defining Partnership For The 21st Century.
LINCOLN WAS THE GREAT AMERICAN SECTIONALIST MASQUERADING AS A NATIONALIST
So, Brooks has Lincoln all wrong, re Brooks' nationalism.
The Republicans were the sectionalist party, not at all a nationalist party, not the Democrats, and Douglas, who were the actual nationalist party.
If Brooks says Trump is a sectionalist, then I say his classic, quintessential predecessor is Lincoln, Brooks' own so called nationalist hero.
Go figure.
The Republicans were the sectionalist party, not at all a nationalist party, not the Democrats, and Douglas, who were the actual nationalist party.
If Brooks says Trump is a sectionalist, then I say his classic, quintessential predecessor is Lincoln, Brooks' own so called nationalist hero.
Go figure.
BROOKS SAYS HE IS A NATIONALIST SO DID LINCOLN
"Donald Trump says he is a nationalist, but you can’t be a nationalist if you despise half the nation — any more than you can be a good father if you despise half your children. You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another — class against class, race against race, tribe against tribe.
"You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity. America is diversity; if you don’t love diversity, you are not an American nationalist." DB
Back at the time of the Civil War "diversity" meant South and North.
Lincoln didn't like diversity.
"A house divide cannot stand." He and his party despised half the nation, as Brooks says.
DOUTHAT VOTE REPUBLICAN SENATE BUT LOCAL DEMOCRATS
Think global act local.
Think local act global.
Think Republican global.
Think Democrat local.
Think local act global.
Think Republican global.
Think Democrat local.
LEOPARD IN JUNGLE SEEMS TO CHANGE HIS SPOTS DAVID BROOKS AMERICAN NATIONALIST
You never heard him say anything like this in 30 years, or did you?
If he did, he was lying back then.
Is he lying now?
You decide.
He cites Ernest Renan. Take a look at Renan, Wikipedia.
Rather hard to believe that Brooks would make such a reference knowingly regarding Renan as an ideal for his (Brooks') nationalism.
Here's a tip: Brooks'American nationalism is Brooks' American globalism.
he confesses he has made an exzzxtensive study of how americans feel. What does it show?
There is virtually no national feeling here whatsoever.
The vast majority of Americans apparently identify with their local area.
He doesn't tell you how many identify with humanity in general (maybe his code word for his globalism), but given that the vast majority of Americans, as he himself admits, identify locally, not even nationalistically, the whole situation is pretty goddamned pathetic any way nyou think you mwant to turn it.
So Brooks, even if he were a nationalist, would be a fish out of water in localist populist America.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser can regale us with his views on this most treacherous of topics....
If he did, he was lying back then.
Is he lying now?
You decide.
He cites Ernest Renan. Take a look at Renan, Wikipedia.
Rather hard to believe that Brooks would make such a reference knowingly regarding Renan as an ideal for his (Brooks') nationalism.
Here's a tip: Brooks'American nationalism is Brooks' American globalism.
he confesses he has made an exzzxtensive study of how americans feel. What does it show?
There is virtually no national feeling here whatsoever.
The vast majority of Americans apparently identify with their local area.
He doesn't tell you how many identify with humanity in general (maybe his code word for his globalism), but given that the vast majority of Americans, as he himself admits, identify locally, not even nationalistically, the whole situation is pretty goddamned pathetic any way nyou think you mwant to turn it.
So Brooks, even if he were a nationalist, would be a fish out of water in localist populist America.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser can regale us with his views on this most treacherous of topics....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)