Thursday, August 29, 2019
KRUGMANOMICS WONKISH ANALYTIC GEOMETRY
Voodoo and Zombie are Republican tax cut creatures.
Vampires are also species of political creatures of both parties.
The evil eye depicted here is Democratic at this time, but could turn Republican.
All circles are composed of mostly Christian stooges of either right left or liberal.
Jesus, of course, appeals to all these stooges.
Let's try to interweave this analysis and diagram with Krugman's telling and appealing account of morons, here and there, and his distinctions and mine in that regard....It cannot be a close comparison, but analogies do exist.
IMBECILE IDIOT MORON INTELLIGENCE SCALE
"Mental deficiency used to be divided into the following sub-classifications, but these labels began to be abused by the public and are now largely obsolete:
Borderline Deficiency (IQ 70-80),
Moron (IQ 50-69),
Imbecile (IQ 20-49)
Idiot (below 20)."
It seems perfectly fair to me for the public, and especially for the press, to use or to abuse these ostensibly obsolete so called labels (but actually real expermentally determined categories) at will and without let or hindrance from any social science arbiters whatsoever.
I fully intend to keep using these terms, and I hope Krugman will too.
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
LET'S JUST NOTE WHOM KRUGMAN CALLS OUT A TRUMP MORON KEVIN HASSETT HANNITY AND WHY
Hassett would not be my bedtime reading but let's take a look at his CV:
most recently: State Farm James Q. Wilson Chair in American Politics and Culture and Director of Research for Domestic Policy at AEI.
He was McCain's chief advisor.
He had been an advisor to G. W Bush and Romney.
He was a policy consultant to Treasury under GHW Bush and Clinton.
He was an economist for the Fed.
he has taught a lot at Columbia.
He was confirmed as Chief of C. of E. Advisors by a senate vote of 81-16.
If he is a moron, which, I fully agree with Krugman, he certainly is, he has an immaculate economics pedigree, but then, so many economists do, don't they!
Re Hannity, I agree with Krugman, again, moron.
One doesn't have to peruse his CV to see this: It is apparent on his face. It is readily apparent. He also often acts like an idiot, not merely a moron.
See especially Sean Hannity, Wikipedia: early life and education. See his parents' jobs. See especially education......
The luck of the Irish.
I see why Krugman lumped Hassett and Hannity together!
Neither of them has a reputation to lose!
I certainly agree with that!
Hannity never graduated from college!
Hassett is a well respected economist!
Re Hannity, I agree with Krugman, again, moron.
One doesn't have to peruse his CV to see this: It is apparent on his face. It is readily apparent. He also often acts like an idiot, not merely a moron.
See especially Sean Hannity, Wikipedia: early life and education. See his parents' jobs. See especially education......
The luck of the Irish.
I see why Krugman lumped Hassett and Hannity together!
Neither of them has a reputation to lose!
I certainly agree with that!
Hannity never graduated from college!
Hassett is a well respected economist!
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
RE KRUGMAN DIATRIBE BROOKS' CALL-OUT CULTURE
If Hassett or Hannity reads Krugman's moron piece and decides to take life, Krugman, or Brooks, would merely call out "good journalism" and good riddance!
Re Kitty Genovese Story, NYT had claimed the whole population was depraved! (In that neighborhood, maybe they were Italians, rather than Jews.)
Re Kitty Genovese Story, NYT had claimed the whole population was depraved! (In that neighborhood, maybe they were Italians, rather than Jews.)
Sunday, January 20, 2019
CHINA'S GROWTH RATE SUPPOSEDLY SLOWEST IN DECADES CONCERNS GLOBAL ECONOMY
Whose economy is the global economy?
Not yours, baby!
When your so called global economy is centered on China, you know you are fucked, either way!
Slow down, speed up, or just stand still, either way, you are fucked!
No Mickey Mouse graphs.
No wonkish.
No bullshit.
You don't need an economist to tell you that.
A retard, moron, or idiot, could somehow mutter it, in so many mostly monosyllables: such as "China bad shit".
Hassett, Hannity, either of these morons (one an economist, but apparently also a moron, or an idiot, or merely a dunce, it is not clear) could stupidly and idiotically call out China....
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman.
Not yours, baby!
When your so called global economy is centered on China, you know you are fucked, either way!
Slow down, speed up, or just stand still, either way, you are fucked!
No Mickey Mouse graphs.
No wonkish.
No bullshit.
You don't need an economist to tell you that.
A retard, moron, or idiot, could somehow mutter it, in so many mostly monosyllables: such as "China bad shit".
Hassett, Hannity, either of these morons (one an economist, but apparently also a moron, or an idiot, or merely a dunce, it is not clear) could stupidly and idiotically call out China....
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman.
Sunday, May 12, 2019
IF BACEVICH IS RIGHT HOW BAZARR SO WRONG? THEY ARE YOUR EXPERTS
I know: Bazarr is a new kind of idiot, a RAND Think Tank Moron, a species of Krugman Moron, specific to Think Tanks.
Or maybe, on the other hand, Bazarr is right, and Bacevich is a Krugman Moron!
You decide. You are not operating with a full deck, you are a little mad, because the product of nationalism since 1500 in the West, but maybe you know that.
Or maybe, on the other hand, Bazarr is right, and Bacevich is a Krugman Moron!
You decide. You are not operating with a full deck, you are a little mad, because the product of nationalism since 1500 in the West, but maybe you know that.
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
LET'S JUST NOTE WHOM KRUGMAN CALLS OUT A TRUMP MORON KEVIN HASSETT HANNITY AND WHY
Hassett would not be my bedtime reading but let's take a look at his CV:
most recently: State Farm James Q. Wilson Chair in American Politics and Culture and Director of Research for Domestic Policy at AEI.
He was McCain's chief advisor.
He had been an advisor to G. W Bush and Romney.
He was a policy consultant to Treasury under GHW Bush and Clinton.
He was an economist for the Fed.
he has taught a lot at Columbia.
He was confirmed as Chief of C. of E. Advisors by a senate vote of 81-16.
If he is a moron, which, I fully agree with Krugman, he certainly is, he has an immaculate economics pedigree, but then, so many economists do, don't they!
Re Hannity, I agree with Krugman, again, moron.
One doesn't have to peruse his CV to see this: It is apparent on his face. It is readily apparent. He also often acts like an idiot, not merely a moron.
See especially Sean Hannity, Wikipedia: early life and education. See his parents' jobs. See especially education......
The luck of the Irish.
I see why Krugman lumped Hassett and Hannity together!
Neither of them has a reputation to lose!
I certainly agree with that!
Hannity never graduated from college!
Hassett is a well respected economist!
Re Hannity, I agree with Krugman, again, moron.
One doesn't have to peruse his CV to see this: It is apparent on his face. It is readily apparent. He also often acts like an idiot, not merely a moron.
See especially Sean Hannity, Wikipedia: early life and education. See his parents' jobs. See especially education......
The luck of the Irish.
I see why Krugman lumped Hassett and Hannity together!
Neither of them has a reputation to lose!
I certainly agree with that!
Hannity never graduated from college!
Hassett is a well respected economist!
Friday, September 6, 2019
KRUGMAN BABY TRUMP IS BAD FOR BUSINESS MAY NEED A FEW POSTS ON THIS WHACKO DIATRIBE
Not that Trump isn't also a whacko.
You won't see where Krugman's bullshit arguments are. He is too clever for that. The assumptions and axioms are where the deceit starts here.
He doesn't argue for those, he blurts them innocently up front in a sentence or paragraph in which his argument follows.
Longterm planning, oxymoron.
R&D, big picture, going by the board generally, and for good reasons.
You don't have to do longterm planning to fricking buy back shares of your own company's fricking stock, or longterm R & D invest to sell unprofitable businesses or buy others.
Call it Clash of Whackos!
What does Krugman mean by productive business, versus say just business, or versus nonproductive business (economist oxymoron), or how about versus wanker moron business?
What does Krugman mean by his distinction: productive business?
We have engaged in wars because they were 'good for business', or good for an election.
Is that what he means, a good for business productive war?
If American businesses have a short time horizon anyway, how does anything Trump does or doesn't do really matter, contrary to Krugman's counterfactual long term planning assertion?
American corporations do not plan much beyond 90 days now anyway. They pretend to do so. They go through the motions.
If so many inputs come from abroad, how can they plan for anything anyway longterm ever? No real vertical integration, no real control over sources of supply and materials. No real control over foreign workers or plant or equipment.
The main thing they need to plan for is to go out of business on short notice if global trade conditions turn suddenly south.
That is as far out as they can reasonably plan, a chapter 11 filing in say three months.
If your one or two suppliers are either in China or in Asia under, or subject to, China's gathering control, then you are and still remain in business merely at the pleasure, and the whim, of the Chinese Communist Party.
We have to continue this tomorrow.
You won't see where Krugman's bullshit arguments are. He is too clever for that. The assumptions and axioms are where the deceit starts here.
He doesn't argue for those, he blurts them innocently up front in a sentence or paragraph in which his argument follows.
Longterm planning, oxymoron.
R&D, big picture, going by the board generally, and for good reasons.
You don't have to do longterm planning to fricking buy back shares of your own company's fricking stock, or longterm R & D invest to sell unprofitable businesses or buy others.
Call it Clash of Whackos!
What does Krugman mean by productive business, versus say just business, or versus nonproductive business (economist oxymoron), or how about versus wanker moron business?
What does Krugman mean by his distinction: productive business?
We have engaged in wars because they were 'good for business', or good for an election.
Is that what he means, a good for business productive war?
If American businesses have a short time horizon anyway, how does anything Trump does or doesn't do really matter, contrary to Krugman's counterfactual long term planning assertion?
American corporations do not plan much beyond 90 days now anyway. They pretend to do so. They go through the motions.
If so many inputs come from abroad, how can they plan for anything anyway longterm ever? No real vertical integration, no real control over sources of supply and materials. No real control over foreign workers or plant or equipment.
The main thing they need to plan for is to go out of business on short notice if global trade conditions turn suddenly south.
That is as far out as they can reasonably plan, a chapter 11 filing in say three months.
If your one or two suppliers are either in China or in Asia under, or subject to, China's gathering control, then you are and still remain in business merely at the pleasure, and the whim, of the Chinese Communist Party.
We have to continue this tomorrow.
Saturday, August 31, 2019
BANNON CCP IS A TERROR ORGANIZATION
What a Krugman idiot. See below:
This is your major manufacturing center, and your major creditor, you idiot.
IMBECILE IDIOT MORON INTELLIGENCE SCALE
This is your major manufacturing center, and your major creditor, you idiot.
Sunday, January 20, 2019
CHINA'S GROWTH RATE SUPPOSEDLY SLOWEST IN DECADES CONCERNS GLOBAL ECONOMY
Whose economy is the global economy?
Not yours, baby!
When your so called global economy is centered on China, you know you are fucked, either way!
Slow down, speed up, or just stand still, either way, you are fucked!
No Mickey Mouse graphs.
No wonkish.
No bullshit.
You don't need an economist to tell you that.
A retard, moron, or idiot, could somehow mutter it, in so many mostly monosyllables: such as "China bad shit".
Hassett, Hannity, either of these morons (one an economist, but apparently also a moron, or an idiot, or merely a dunce, it is not clear) could stupidly and idiotically call out China....
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman.
Not yours, baby!
When your so called global economy is centered on China, you know you are fucked, either way!
Slow down, speed up, or just stand still, either way, you are fucked!
No Mickey Mouse graphs.
No wonkish.
No bullshit.
You don't need an economist to tell you that.
A retard, moron, or idiot, could somehow mutter it, in so many mostly monosyllables: such as "China bad shit".
Hassett, Hannity, either of these morons (one an economist, but apparently also a moron, or an idiot, or merely a dunce, it is not clear) could stupidly and idiotically call out China....
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman.
"Mental deficiency used to be divided into the following sub-classifications, but these labels began to be abused by the public and are now largely obsolete:
Borderline Deficiency (IQ 70-80),
Moron (IQ 50-69),
Imbecile (IQ 20-49)
Idiot (below 20)."
Thursday, March 5, 2020
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Monday, December 16, 2019
BUTTIGIEG HAS PROVED HIMSELF A KRUGMAN MORON
Buttigieg has frequently pointed to automation as the chief cause of the great loss of manufacturing jobs nationwide.
Monday, September 9, 2019
ONLY A KRUGMAN MORON OR IMBECILE SAYS ONLY CHINA CAN SAVE US NOW
Little late to be saying something as dumb and dumber as that now.
Let's just hope he's mildly retarded, and someone malevolently, editorial board, coached him to write that.
Let's just hope he's mildly retarded, and someone malevolently, editorial board, coached him to write that.
No comments:
Post a Comment