Wednesday, August 25, 2010
RE INTERNATIONAL INSTABILITY
If one were really serious about things like 'possible worlds', given our over extended trading regime and vulnerabilities,
the discussion should really revolve around the need, because of the ineptitude of our trading regime, to take over or control large well developed sectors of the globe, now economically necessary for the average American's subsistence,
not just desert backwaters like Afghanistan or Iraq, in spite of the oil in the Middle East,
thanks to globalization. Sounds like a great source for a big war.
I assume that that discussion has been under way, for some years now, in Washington.
If you want large scale instability, engage in large scale international trade and investment.
the discussion should really revolve around the need, because of the ineptitude of our trading regime, to take over or control large well developed sectors of the globe, now economically necessary for the average American's subsistence,
not just desert backwaters like Afghanistan or Iraq, in spite of the oil in the Middle East,
thanks to globalization. Sounds like a great source for a big war.
I assume that that discussion has been under way, for some years now, in Washington.
If you want large scale instability, engage in large scale international trade and investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment