She says things any idiot could have seen for decades, in fact since WWII, and to some extent since WWI, and the late 19th Century, for very obvious reasons.
The liberalism in the West that engendered the current global collapse of a liberally constructed globalism you see, goes back to the 18th Century, to the Age of the Democratic Revolution, then rolls forward.
Thunberg's very emergence as a dissenting spokesperson is itself a symptom of that liberal ideology, with its enervating modern and postmodern traditions of free heterodoxy and dissent, which she decries.
She and those like her cannot solve anything now. But they don't know that. Or do they? Maybe she knows.
Lecturing a bunch of liberals on their weakness is rather like pissing in the wind.
Lecturing a bunch of liberals on their weakness is rather like pissing in the wind.
No comments:
Post a Comment