Friday, February 16, 2018
DK POST MY COMMENT
"Today much of the left believes in a world where virtue or the lack of it is defined by skin color, gender, and sexual orientation." DK
I would go, and have gone, a little further, perhaps too far, in this sort of analysis of globalist leftism:
The good skin color is a blend where no race is distinct, the good gender is at best ambivalent, the good sexual orientation multivalent.
I would go, and have gone, a little further, perhaps too far, in this sort of analysis of globalist leftism:
The good skin color is a blend where no race is distinct, the good gender is at best ambivalent, the good sexual orientation multivalent.
This is an old post of mine on multiculturalism and where it has led: Wednesday,
April 5, 2017
LET ME EXPLAIN THIS FURTHER RACE RELIGION CIVILIZATION
See this prior post:
RACIST UNIRACIALISM UNIRELIGIONISM GLOBALISM MELTINGPOTISM
Where to begin? Once you challenge the very notion of racial differences being a natural, or neutral, even an inherently good thing, you come up against other related organizing principles for societies, such as religion, government, and civilization.
Separating church from state, fallout from The Reformation Fallacy, has turned out to be another thin wedge of a broader Western assault on social and political reality as it had always been.
Separating church from state, was then, eventually, only in the later 19th Century and only in the West, combined with a completely new, and quite radical, uniracialism, call it the racial and political brotherhood of man, so to speak, into a powerful new multidimensional globalist vision, quite apart from the economic globalism of Smithist laissez faire, already taking over in the West since the late 18th Century, which also played right into globalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment