BOOMERBUSTER

BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO

Monday, August 28, 2017

GUESS WHAT? YELLOW CIVILIZATIONALISTS, ROOSKIES ETC

When we talk about black white racism, they laugh at us. Think about it.
 
It is a joke, for them, that will never, ever, go away. Their grandchildren will be able to look over at us, and laugh.
 
After they take over, it will be especially funny, for them, not for us.

Rather like The Chinese Connection, the Japanese laughing at the Chinese...

Who will have the last laugh, in these other, wider, encounters?

Good question.

Who, do you think, just allowed North Korea to send an intercontinental ballistic missile over Japan?

Did Putin also know, ahead of time? What do you think? Why?

TIPPING POINTS

Virtually any move we make now will have some of the characteristics of a blunder.
 
We have long passed the point of no return.
 
Aggression, appeasement, paralysis, all unhelpful...
 
Aggression is the least helpful; aggression even only between others would also not be helpful in this cul de sac. Appeasement may seem helpful. It is not. Paralysis, self evidently not helpful, but if it avoids aggression, better than the alternatives.

THE MENU SAUERBRATEN REPORT

Another very successful dish. Tough grazed beef pot roast, marinated 4 or 5 days in pickle, sauerkraut, and mild pepper leftover juices from the jars. Drained, simmered 4 to 5 hours, with onions, garlic. Don't add any salt or much oil. Root vegetables roasted separately in the oven, or boiled and mashed. You could serve this with sour cream, sauerkraut, mild brown or Dijon mustard, or all three.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

THE ROOSKIES LOVE MY GARLIC POST!

EntryPageviews
Russia

51
United States

41
South Korea

25
Ireland

6
Portugal

6
France

5
Brazil

1
Canada

1
Indonesia

1
India

1

WHEN YOU ARE TAKEN OVER BY YELLOW CIVILIZATIONALISTS YOU WON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BLACK WHITE RACISM ANYMORE

You will be told how to behave.

I ADDED A PARAGRAPH OR TWO AT THE END FOR THE FEW COOKS OUT THERE MARCELLA HAZAN REFERENCE

Saturday, August 26, 2017


THE MENU HOW TO PREPARE CLOVES OF GARLIC?

This is a post I have long been aching to write.
 
It is not what one might expect.
 
Some very few readers of this blog, who actually cook, may be befuddled. That's fine.
 
You may have been schooled or trained or swayed by accounts of the way to prepare garlic cloves for cooking in various dishes.
 
Nowadays, everyone treats it as gospel that they should remove the garlic clove skin a certain particular way.
 
You can find this technique in almost every current book or video, including even Briwa's. Robin Ellis, himself a very good published cook, cooking instructor, as well as a famous actor, follows Marcella in this, I have no doubt.
 
I just want to discuss, at some length, this method, and describe the drawbacks with it. Try to bear with me for a moment.
 
So, what technique am I critical of? it is this: most chefs now teach their students to remove the skins of garlic cloves by smashing each of them gently (or quite roughly, I have seen both styles) with the flat of their large chef's knife, after which it is known that the skins can be easily removed....
 
What does this easy and quick process and skin removal also inadvertently do?
 
It crushes the oil and juice of the garlic clove out onto the skin, and also onto the cutting board and onto the knife. iI does not leave this oil or juice in the clove itself which they then either slice, or crush in a garlic press.
 
What happens to that large proportion of garlic oil and juice from a now partially crushed but fully peeled clove of garlic?
 
It is now unceremoniously discarded, reeking with good oil and juice, with the removed peel!
 
Granted, some North Italian and French cooks don't want the strong taste of garlic in their sometimes delicate confections.
 
They often then slice rather than crush the already crushed peeled cloves, to underscore their distaste for the strength of the vegetable they have emasculated.
 
Anyway, you can imagine what my suggestions to remedy this sad commentary and sad story might be.

Let's just imagine, for a moment that you are an 800 pound gorilla. You dug up an onion, in the jungle.  You want, for some reason, to remove  its skin, before devouring it.

For this reason, incidentally, because, say, you have some reason (whatever it might be) to remove the onion skin, some professor at BU, or Harvard, wants to legislate for you your human rights.

What do you do, about the skin? Just what Marcella Hazan does, but with your flat palm. 

Of course, you succeed, the peel is removed. After all you are an 800 pound gorilla!

Imagine the result, onion juice and oil everywhere...

But you have proven that you are human!

You might thereby, were you a lucky ape, gain entree into the salons of certain primates of Park Avenue.

This post is dedicated to Randy Fertel.

SOMEONE SAW THIS GREAT OLD POST REFERENCE RE DK COMMENT

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

SEE DK'S CURRENT POST AND COMMENTS

I may have made myself misunderstood by Mr Glover and others.

See this article and especially the quote below:


www.nps.gov/resources/story.htm?id=251

The Southern lag in industrial development did not result from any inherent economic disadvantages. There was great wealth in the South, but it was primarily tied up in the slave economy. In 1860, the economic value of slaves in the United States exceeded the invested value of all of the nation's railroads, factories, and banks combined. On the eve of the Civil War, cotton prices were at an all-time high. The Confederate leaders were confident that the importance of cotton on the world market, particularly in England and France, would provide the South with the diplomatic and military assistance they needed for victory.

RE LIBERAL ACADEMIA TERMS SEARCH GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP INDIVIDUALS THINK 9/11 KATRINA

Think of a lot of things....

Think, for example, this:

"Saturday, February 15, 2014

KEY PASSAGE FROM DK'S CURRENT POST

"...And states, led by the United States, define their international enemies not as other nations or even political parties, but as individuals.  That is why drones are becoming our weapon of choice...."

American individualism is a species of anarchism. 

It kills off, not really intentionally,  leadership, and political order, of any kind, both politically and militarily.

As a result, with the slow temporary death of the nation state, which the America free globalist market system has lead the world in trying to kill off, along with imperial states, and other federal states, there are only relatively weak nation states and empires, and a large number within these of smaller groups of armed, or unarmed, people and individuals, (state and local governments etc.) within an increasingly differentiated sea of disoriented individuals, many of whom now see only individualism as a way forward in the absence of any other paradigm under market capitalism."

Terms search: global citizenship

Saturday, August 26, 2017

SOMEONE SAW THIS OLD 2014 POST WHERE THEN DOES IT LEAD?

I will tell you. It will ultimately lead, at least to some extent, to the identification of these individuals with their civilizational associations, first. Not necessarily their nation state, a sad thing for so many of them anyway.These identifications may be mainly religious, racial, some combination, anything to give them some pathetic sense of shelter....

Call it a Hobbesian Gimme Shelter phenonenon.

Saturday, February 15, 2014


KEY PASSAGE FROM DK'S CURRENT POST

"...And states, led by the United States, define their international enemies not as other nations or even political parties, but as individuals.  That is why drones are becoming our weapon of choice...."

American individualism is a species of anarchism. 

It kills off, not really intentionally,  leadership, and political order, of any kind, both politically and militarily.

As a result, with the slow temporary death of the nation state, which the America free globalist market system has lead the world in trying to kill off, along with imperial states, and other federal states, there are only relatively weak nation states and empires, and a large number within these of smaller groups of armed, or unarmed, people and individuals, (state and local governments etc.) within an increasingly differentiated sea of disoriented individuals, many of whom now see only individualism as a way forward in the absence of any other paradigm under market capitalism.

THE MENU HOW TO PREPARE CLOVES OF GARLIC?

This is a post I have long been aching to write.
 
It is not what one might expect.
 
Some very few readers of this blog, who actually cook, may be befuddled. That's fine.
 
You may have been schooled or trained or swayed by accounts of the way to prepare garlic cloves for cooking in various dishes.
 
Nowadays, everyone treats it as gospel that they should remove the garlic clove skin a certain particular way.
 
You can find this technique in almost every current book or video, including even Briwa's. Robin Ellis, himself a very good published cook, cooking instructor, as well as a famous actor, follows Marcella in this, I have no doubt.
 
I just want to discuss, at some length, this method, and describe the drawbacks with it. Try to bear with me for a moment.
 
So, what technique am I critical of? it is this: most chefs now teach their students to remove the skins of garlic cloves by smashing each of them gently (or quite roughly, I have seen both styles) with the flat of their large chef's knife, after which it is known that the skins can be easily removed....
 
What does this easy and quick process and skin removal also inadvertently do?
 
It crushes the oil and juice of the garlic clove out onto the skin, and also onto the cutting board and onto the knife. iI does not leave this oil or juice in the clove itself which they then either slice, or crush in a garlic press.
 
What happens to that large proportion of garlic oil and juice from a now partially crushed but fully peeled clove of garlic?
 
It is now unceremoniously discarded, reeking with good oil and juice, with the removed peel!
 
Granted, some North Italian and French cooks don't want the strong taste of garlic in their sometimes delicate confections.
 
They often then slice rather than crush the already crushed peeled cloves, to underscore their distaste for the strength of the vegetable they have emasculated.
 
Anyway, you can imagine what my suggestions to remedy this sad commentary and sad story might be.

Let's just imagine, for a moment that you are an 800 pound gorilla. You dug up an onion, in the jungle.  You want, for some reason, to remove  its skin, before devouring it. What do you do? Just what Marcella Hazan does, but with your flat palm. 

Of course, you succeed, the peel is removed. After all you are an 800 pound gorilla!

Imagine the result, onion juice and oil everywhere...
 
 

Friday, August 25, 2017

IF YOU ARE WONDERING WHY AND HOW CHINA AND RUSSIA ARE FINALLY IN THE NEXT TO LAST DITCH

taking you over, I can explain it for you, but it would take more time and attention than most of you have.

You can read certain posts on this blog.  That is perhaps the best.

GURU RAM RAHIM SINGH RAPE CHAOS

It would have been better had they, all Indians, been ruled from London, and that they had been required to pay the bill!

Of course, London would have winked at Guru rape matters.

On the other hand, if you don't want to impose a protectorate on these guru bastards, then don't foist Western legal or moral rules on them, either.
 
I prefer the former solution, not the latter.

Sorry but not sorry.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

CONVICTED KILLER MARK ASAY KILLED BY LETHAL INJECTION

They call this a racially motivated killing.

What a lot of bull.

Totally different story going on there, obviously.

Asay shoots a prostitute, in drag, after discovering that she was a guy (not that she was black; he obviously knew that already).

That is not racially motivated, it is sexually motivated.

It very likely should never even have been charged as murder 1, or even murder 2.

I once defended a case like this, although the encounter did not result in death, much less, murder.  My client was blind drunk, terrified, and well armed.  The state's victim was shot in the groin.

BUTTERFIELD AND PALMER TOGETHER

Wednesday, August 23, 2017


WHIG HISTORY ENLIGHTENMENT REFORMATION HISTORY LESSON TEARING DOWN MONUMENTS

I just like to quote Butterfield....
If I could quote the whole monograph, that would be great, but I am not going to do that....
   "If Protestants and Catholics of the 16th century could return to look at the 20th century, they would equally deplore this strange mad world, and much as they fought one another there is little doubt that they would be united in opposition to us; and Luther would confess that he had been wrong and wicked if it was by his doing that this liberty, this anarchy had been let loose, while his enemies would be quick to say that this decline of religion was bound to be the result of a schism such as his.  The issue between Protestants and Catholics in the 16th century was an issue of their world and not of our world, and we are being definitely unhistorical, we are forgetting that Protestantism and Catholicism have both had a long history since 1517, if we argue from a rash analogy that the one was fighting for something like our modern world while the other was trying to prevent its coming.  Our most secular historians, and the ones who are most grateful for that 'process of secularisation,' that 'break-up of mediaevalism,' of which so much has been traced to the Reformation, are inclined to write sometimes as though Protestantism in itself was somehow constituted to assist that process.  It is easy to forget how much Luther was in rebellion against the secularisation of Church and society, how much the Reformation shares the psychology of religious revivals, and to what extent Luther's rebellion against the Papacy helped to provoke that very fanaticism of the Counter-reformation against which we love to see the Protestant virtues shine." pb p 36, 37
Palmer:
"In theory, the church had to be intolerant, for it was responsible to God for bringing the true faith to mankind.  In theory, the philosophers stood for the toleration of all beliefs and the free expression of all ideas.  In fact, however, the situation was less simple.  The philosophers were by no means willing to allow liberty to their opponents, not even to those who were far from representing the formidable power of the church.  Their method was not often the mild persuasion favored by liberals.  They talked much of reason, but their sharpest instruments were ridicule and vilification, which enabled them to throw off a man's arguments by defaming his character or belittling his intelligence.  La Baumelle went to jail, thanks partly to Voltaire, whose works he had ventured to criticize.  Freron, a conservative and Catholic journalist, was called by Voltaire, in a single work, a scribbler, scoundrel, toad, lizard, snake, spider, viper's tongue, crooked mind, heart of filth, doer of evil, rascal, impudent person, cowardly knave, spy, and hound.  He found his journal gagged, his income halved and his career ruined by the concerted attacks of the philosophers.  To silence him, at least two of these philosophers, Marmontel and d'Alemberte, appealed to the censors whose very existence the enlightened thinkers are supposed to have abhorred.  It is not possible, in short, to accept as characteristic of these thinkers the statement often attributed to Voltaire, that, though he disagreed with what a man said, he would fight to the death for his right to say it." Catholics and Unbelievers in Eighteenth Century France, pb, p 6.

"Though he disagreed with what a man said, he would fight to the death for his right to say it."
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/06/01/defend-say/

IF THIS IS WHAT I HAVE CALLED THE TORY FALLACY THEN LET IT BE ME

"If Protestants and Catholics of the 16th century could return to look at the 20th century, they would equally deplore this strange mad world, and much as they fought one another there is little doubt that they would be united in opposition to us; and Luther would confess that he had been wrong and wicked if it was by his doing that this liberty, this anarchy had been let loose, while his enemies would be quick to say that this decline of religion was bound to be the result of a schism such as his."  Butterfield

THE MENU LUNCH BOT NOT BLT

Bacon onion tomato. I skip the lettuce, waste of time for this sandwich. A break with tradition.

For dinner, I am thinking maybe cold shaved broiled filet mignon leftover sandwich, with bacon fat avocado olive oil mayonnaise.

MY LAPTOP JUST ADVISED I HAD LOGGED OUT FROM ANOTHER LOCATION

I don't have another location....................

SOMEONE SAW THIS RECENT ELVIS POST HERE'S A FOOTNOTE

Sunday, July 23, 2017

PRESLEY PERSON CHEROKEES GATES AND OPRAH

Footnote:

"Elvis Presley is the greatest cultural force in the 20th century...." Leonard Bernstein, late 60s interview. Time, August 21, 2017

As I said recently, honey, watching Elvis, you didn't know whether you were in church or in hell!

When his family moved to Memphis from Tupelo, they went to the same church as my uncle Ned Haynes and his family, and also were neighbors; uncle Ned's stepson was a good buddy of little Elvis...my uncle gave them a little money to buy candy, on the week ends...

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

WHIG HISTORY ENLIGHTENMENT REFORMATION HISTORY LESSON TEARING DOWN MONUMENTS

I just like to quote Butterfield....
 
If I could quote the whole monograph, that would be great, but I am not going to do that....
 
   "If Protestants and Catholics of the 16th century could return to look at the 20th century, they would equally deplore this strange mad world, and much as they fought one another there is little doubt that they would be united in opposition to us; and Luther would confess that he had been wrong and wicked if it was by his doing that this liberty, this anarchy had been let loose, while his enemies would be quick to say that this decline of religion was bound to be the result of a schism such as his.  The issue between Protestants and Catholics in the 16th century was an issue of their world and not of our world, and we are being definitely unhistorical, we are forgetting that Protestantism and Catholicism have both had a long history since 1517, if we argue from a rash analogy that the one was fighting for something like our modern world while the other was trying to prevent its coming.  Our most secular historians, and the ones who are most grateful for that 'process of secularisation,' that 'break-up of mediaevalism,' of which so much has been traced to the Reformation, are inclined to write sometimes as though Protestantism in itself was somehow constituted to assist that process.  It is easy to forget how much Luther was in rebellion against the secularisation of Church and society, how much the Reformation shares the psychology of religious revivals, and to what extent Luther's rebellion against the Papacy helped to provoke that very fanaticism of the Counter-reformation against which we love to see the Protestant virtues shine." pb p 36, 37
 
 
 
 

ROOSKIES SUDDENLY ALL GONE NOT ONE LEFT OR ARE THEY LURKING THERE AMONG THE US?

EntryPageviews
United States

99
Colombia

20
Portugal

9
France

5
Poland

3
Australia

2
Spain

2
Hungary

2
Brazil

1
Canada

1