audience today

Entry	Pageviews
France	50
Russia	22
United States	9
Spain	8
Ukraine	8

SOME ASTUTE OBSERVER NOTED THIS OLD POST May 5, 2014	5
RE DAVID KAISER'S CURRENT POST Jul 17, 2011	4
See DK's July 1 post Jul 6, 2011	3
re Piketty DK POST May 5, 2014	3
Fragilobalization or Globalfragilation Nov 29, 2011	1
RE NYT NEWT THE INSIDE MAN FANNIE FREDDIE Nov 19, 2011	1
BBC SCOTT LONDON KPMG May 29, 2013	1
GAME OVER EURO Nov 24, 2011	1
RE NATASHA BEDINGFIELD WHAT'S WRONG WITH A FEW BLE... Nov 26, 2011	1
RE MAVERICK EXECUTIVE HOLD UP MISE EN SCENE May 29, 2013	1

audience today

Entry	Pageviews
United States	12
Ukraine	8
Russia	2
Singapore	2

re DK QUOTE

"...But while we have effectively thrown in with the Shi'ites in the Tigris and Euphrates valley and the territory immediately to its East, we favor the Sunnis, led by Saudi Arabia, in the region of the Persian Gulf...." DK

There seem to be various interpretations one might place on this state of affairs.

If we admit, as DK does, that these really are intra civilizational conflicts between Sunni and Shiite, going on simultaneously, then we are egging on both sides of it. 

Rather like making contributions to both parties....sporting, some no doubt might say.

RE PIKETTY

re MY OLD POST RE INFLATION DEFLATION

Call it something like his term ' convergence '.

RE GANDHI BIN LADEN

See also, BBC, today, Gandhi's letter to Hitler....

Gandhi thought, perhaps, that Nazi Germany was just another Western liberal state which he could influence against itself, as he had so effectively done against Britain's interests, and India's, in India.

MAVERICK ENTREPRENEURIAL LIBERAL MARKET CAPITALIST PARADIGM

Piketty: "One should be wary, however,..." p 85

Terms search maverick executive, rail to rail, Rand, Dusty, Thurston, Macaire, Casanova, doomsday discipline, etc.

Cf the liberal economist Denoyer.....'entrepreneurs are all you need folks!' 

READING PIKETTY AGAIN

His work makes clear that it has been by Western sponsored free trade, rather than by free movement of capital from West to Rest, that developing civilizations and their core states are pulling closer to the West. p.71

Ultimately, it will be realized to have been a negative sum game, not merely a zero one, for Western civ, the only criterion that will count, a civilizational one.

reference re 1917 decision re Jewish settlement in Palestine

terms search Israel, see Michael Howard's article.

audience today

Entry	Pageviews
Switzerland	21
Ukraine	15
United States	9
France	3
United Kingdom	1
Netherlands	1
Taiwan	1

re some old cartoons

terms search Dusty

RE THE CLASH

Kenyan art in Venice is Chinese....

RE ISRAEL PALESTINE AND THE US

Re Modern Israel's aspirations, in the Middle East and elsewhere, one has to point out that the ancient Kingdom of Israel never really was what it was always thought to be.

See, for example,  The Bible Unearthed.

An earlier good book, Who Wrote The Bible?

the menu

see
The Gorilla Man and the Empress of Steak

audience now

Entry	Pageviews
Ukraine	5
United States	4

PRIVATIZING AUSTRALIA'S POWER see reuters

China is very interested. 

re my deglobb blog totals views for all time

Entry	Pageviews
Russia	53
United States	51
Germany	40
Romania	18
Latvia	11
Malaysia	4
Bulgaria	3
Poland	3
United Kingdom	2
Israel	2

ASIA UNSQUARE DANCE ONGOING

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/09/asia-do-si-do-mise-en-scene.html

the menu

MAHATMA GANDHI OSAMA BIN LADEN HINDU MUSLIM INSURGENTS SHARED VALUES HUMAN RIGHTS HUNTINGTON ETC

What do they have, very much, in common?

They each, very effectively, used Western Civilization's institutions themselves, against the West itself.

POLAND IS WILD FOR THIS SITE

Entry	Pageviews
Poland	103
United States	53
India	4
Pakistan	3

I AM MORE SYMPATHETIC

to a Pimpernel than a montagnard, neither of which, however, have we here.

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY NOT QUITE AS DIVISIVE

as, say, Lincoln's. 

Not because of Obama's policies, but rather of what he symbolizes.

"Obama's presence in the White House has simply wiped out the Democratic Party not only in the old Confederacy, but in the border states, except Maryland and Delaware, as well." DK

RE WESTERN CIVILIZATION THE DISASTROUS CENTURY

It seems to me appropriate to call the 20th Century, 

re Western civilization,

The Disastrous Century.

RE ASYLUM SEEKERS

Why block  non English speaking asylum seeking hostile civilizationals, 

while nevertheless allowing a hostile civilizational core state, China, to more or less take over the Australian economy?

SOPEL BIBI

The issue of Israel isn't partisan here.

Sad commentary.

RE FASHION WEEK THE MENU

For Larry, a talented gourmand, polymath, and physician, who studied in New Orleans, and who, sadly, has passed; 

and Randy, a gourmand, academician,  and more, who, as far as I know has not.

A literary and culinary reference, for these two topics:

A Confederacy Of Dunces

Also, re the menu, I will never forget the lesson, in the kitchen, on cooking a steak, at the first restaurant back then in New Orleans, given by Vontel, 1971. 

New Orleans, you know, has been known for Cajun and creole cuisine, but not so much for steak houses.

RE DK POST AND THE MEDIA

"Professor

Great post. 

Re the media, see my blog, terms search Lorch. 

That has been how it has been, the order of the day, since the 18th century.

Even more overtly ideologically oriented media have been the order of the day since Lorch wrote.

Quigley chronicles European media, British especially, "The Anglo American Establishment".

all the best"

The important stories, are, of course, those that weren't published, then or now, those (not published) explaining why certain other possible articles were published instead, and (why) others were not published at all.

The most important material, then and now is not available to the press, for a variety of reasons, good and bad.

NYT TPP CONGRESS

This of course is complicated bull smoke screen.

MIGHT START READING THIS AT SOME POINT

http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Public_Administration_Napoleonic_Kingdom_Italy-Carroll_Quigley.pdf

a propos DK's current post

Most advanced states, heretofore, for various reasons, needed world trade, often as part of a strategic position emanating out of conflicts within Europe, within western civilization. They also needed banker participation in trade ventures related to international investments and security.

Those advanced states, which needed world trade more than other advanced states, are more likely to end up in some aggressor posture, of one kind or another,  than those few, or unique, states which do not.

Certainly they found, in most cases, that they needed investment banker participation to prosper.

The United States, on the other hand, did not, for a variety of reasons. 

I can cite authorities for this if need be.

RE ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR

I ordered a copy of the book...

I am curious to see how his account corresponds with Tragedy and Hope, especially chapters like 'XI Changing Economic Patterns',  'XII The Policy Of Appeasement 1931-1936'...

Quigley cites authorities in the book, but they are often not specific references, in particular works, on particular points; those are exceptions which do exist, sprinkled throughout the text itself. He does not do 'footnotes'.

THE TRADITIONAL EXPLANATION OF REVOLUTIONARY CONDITIONS

do not apply, under conditions of globalized, weak, fragmentary regimes everywhere.

Rather, something much more like trans and intra civilizational wars, involving fault line conflicts, among feudalized populations everywhere, including incidental uses of weapons of mass destruction, is more likely than are ordered, nation state type, 'revolutions' anywhere.

Drone strikes, authorized by individual princes against individual princes and their condottieri,  are very like assassinations among princely groups in and among city states of the middle ages and early renaissance.

IF HE POSTS MY LAST COMMENT

This is part of the WWII dilemma aftermath, Cold War and globalization, to which it solicited some remark, a discussion which Americans, especially, have seldom knowledgeably engaged in, as far as I know, since WWII:

"In times of strong governments and alliances, status quo powers can more easily make their will felt--and in Europe, both the US and the USSR were status quo powers for most of the Cold War.  But in times of weak governments with less legitimacy, a disruptive regime has far greater opportunities.  Putin understands this.  He also understands that the United States was first off the mark using the instability of the post-Cold War period for its own purposes, expanding NATO, making war on Yugoslavia, and invading Iraq.  As he repeatedly makes clear in speeches, two can play this game.  So far, no Asian nation has decided to do the same.  But the long-term future of Europe is once again in doubt." DK

PAST CARTOON BLAST RE CLASH

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/11/mise-en-scene-maverick-executive-free.html

RE REJOINDER TO BRUCE WILDER REMARKS DK SITE

"Western values and the world" DK post:

Bruce Wilder:
"Could even the eloquent Obama make a convincing case for liberal hypocrisy? Seeing the flawed movie, Selma, reminded me that I grew up in the era of peak egalitarianism, when people actually expected leaders and law to enact ideals. Enlightenment liberalism was claiming that its truths were self-evident in the 18th century, when Thomas Jefferson, slaveholder, wrote that all men are created equal. It's part of the schtick, not an indicator of some new weakness of character in the 21st century. Your proposed remedy -- a renewal of national solidarity and purpose -- indicates that instinctively you understand that the political problem of our time is not philosophic ideology per se, but authority and authoritarianism.

"The common, shared experience of national service, national purpose, and national identity, which has been a foundational component of liberal nationalism -- the ideal of a people responsibly governing itself through constitutional institutions according to democratic, egalitarian principles of fairness -- is at a low ebb. Americans, in particular, exhibit an extreme of social disaffiliation and atomistic individualism, reflected in libertarian ideological attitudes.

Being frightened by seemingly senseless, random acts of violence, and the expedient use of authority in militarized police state responses, just pushes the society further and further in the direction of authoritarianism. I can scarcely imagine the effect on Boston of effective imposition of martial law following the Boston Marathon bombing, or the more recent national manhunts in France and Belgium. The number of deaths cannot account for how terror and the response to terror is re-shaping attitudes and institutions.

Liberalism has always had a love-hate relationship with the lower classes, with the poor. That historical ambivalence was evident in the dynamics of the French Revolution, in the tension over the demands of the common people for bread over and against the bourgeois demand for laissez-faire. It was evident when capital-L Liberals presided over Irish potato famine that killed a million people. It was evident in the callous indifference and inattention that allowed the worst impulses to drive colonial and foreign policy in far-away places (and still drives so many to overlook the rank incompetence and corruption of the American foreign policy establishment).

At its best, enlightenment liberalism embraced and legitimated conflict, and the check that an educated mass opinion might provide against irresponsible exercise of authority. The concepts of a loyal opposition, of a Country Party, of labor unions and mass movements, of a separation of powers forcing rational deliberation and blocking the formation of fixed and tyrannical factions, within the framework of a shared national identity and loyalty -- this was enlightenment liberalism at its best and most practical.

We have dissent in the purely symbolic sense of rude or noisy caricature -- in the U.S., the right parodies itself in its strident albeit impotent expression of resentments. Rush Limbaugh is Charlie Hebdo every day on the radio."

"What we do not have is either a genuine national solidarity -- the intellectual left largely rejects national identity as a species of racism in the genus of unalloyed evil -- or a check by the masses on authority. Obama prosecutes only whistleblowers, not banksters. No one is held at fault for more than a decade of military and foreign policy failure on an epic scale; we will be training an effective local force real soon now.

In Europe, democratic institutions have ceded their power to unaccountable supra-national authorities, and the consequence is the Euro and an economic catastrophe of a magnitude for some countries comparable with the Great Depression. The violence of Islamists serves as a distraction, justifying the building up of a security state to defend this betrayal of mass interests, while liberals look on uncomprehending.

I'm deeply troubled by the notion that Islam embodies any philosophic ideas that might compete with Western Enlightenment liberalism. I think that simply mistakes the case. The clash of civilizations notion is profoundly silly, not profound. Population and resource pressures are the driving forces, and institutional failures are handicapping the response. The institutions that failed were Western institutions. Saddam Hussein and Bashad al-Assad were friggin' socialists! Islam can hardly explain the upheavals in places as disparate as Ukraine, Thailand, Argentina, Mexico, nor the palsied response to the economic crises created by the Euro in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and France.

Islam and Terror are convenient distractions for an elite that does not care to be held responsible."

RE his remark about 'The Clash', I would just say that the last time that the West had a real chance, physically, to prevent the USSR, a very large Slavic nation, from winning WWII, against the West, and then threatening Western Europe, and then from obtaining and proliferating weapons of mass destruction, was in roughly 1944, 1945. 

One has only to review something like The Haunted Wood to see how urgent this problem had become by then. 

Those were good reasons why I have said that the best solution was 'the Patton solution' at that time.

The Baltic States, and even more so, Ukraine are traditional Russian territories in my judgment. Some may quibble....

Of course, going farther back, to USA WWI blunders, we only entered WWI because of the Bolshevik Revolution.....

Don't get me started on this.....

RE THE ANGLO AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT

Reading Quigley's book, one has to, then, call back into question Sir Michael's comment below.

"...The citizens of the United States had not joined in the Second World War to prop up a system of imperial domination against which they had been the first people to revolt...." Sir Michael Howard

In a wider context, the imperial domination of the Western Imperial Powers, and especially of the British hegemony of that domination, fell apart from within, and specifically from within Britain, rather than later at the instance of the United States, although, certainly, he was right that, by the end of WWII, we were the only power, then, which could have combined with the Imperial Powers to salvage their dominion (and ours).

RE ELVIS HE ALSO IT SEEMS WAS PART CHEROKEE ONE SIXTEENTH