I have said, in other contexts, more or less similar things:
'The question remains, what’s wrong with a little
inconsistency among ostensibly objective experts?
What’s wrong with a wart or two on the theme of the case?
What’s wrong with singing out of tune, just a little bit?
What’s wrong, deep down, with the 'facts' as they are?
(Phenomenology, of course, presents a modern
conundrum for 'the facts as they are'.)'
No comments:
Post a Comment