BOOMERBUSTER

BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO

Saturday, November 26, 2011

RE NATASHA BEDINGFIELD WHAT'S WRONG WITH A FEW BLEMISHES ON THE THEME OF THE CASE

She makes a great, anti laissez faire, case for authenticity and charm of unadulterated persons. 


I have said, in other contexts, more or less similar things:




'The question remains, what’s wrong with a little 

inconsistency among ostensibly objective experts?  

What’s wrong with a wart or two on the theme of the case?  

What’s wrong with singing out of tune, just a little bit?  

What’s wrong, deep down, with the 'facts' as they are? 

(Phenomenology, of course, presents a modern  

conundrum for 'the facts as they are'.)' 





No comments:

Post a Comment