Let's talk for a moment about poverty.
Half the people in India, her birth country, defecate in the open.
Why should poor Hindus there, the half billion of them who mostly live on $300 or less a year, give a good Goddamn about a rich man's recovery here or not, or about what lackey imperialilst richey rich Uncle Tom expat Tomtam says or does?
Or the so called plight of American negroes, even the poorest of whom live like kings compared to even the average Hindu?
Those big corporations NYT rails against being bailed out and recovered are the same ones the NYT has for generations vigorously sponsored, the same ones offshoring potential work for poor American negroes and also white collar poor and poorer Americans whites or negroes, to a small but growing proportion of the Hindu seething dissatisfied and radicalizing mass where she was born.
Why not just give that recovery money directly to those half billion starving Hindus?
There are a whole hell of a lot more of them, hundreds of millions, versus twenty!
They are a whole lot poorer than so called silver spoon poor American negroes.
Those big corporations NYT rails against being bailed out and recovered are the same ones the NYT has for generations vigorously sponsored, the same ones offshoring potential work for poor American negroes and also white collar poor and poorer Americans whites or negroes, to a small but growing proportion of the Hindu seething dissatisfied and radicalizing mass where she was born.
Why not just give that recovery money directly to those half billion starving Hindus?
There are a whole hell of a lot more of them, hundreds of millions, versus twenty!
They are a whole lot poorer than so called silver spoon poor American negroes.
No comments:
Post a Comment