NYT really says it is the sin of Western Civilization, first implicitly against the Jews. That is a theme you do not realize at first.....
It was also Moses' sin too. He crossed races. That was a sin for them. Because of this, he may have lost the Priesthood of Israel to Aaron. The Aaronids held the priesthood for ever after.
Despite being defined by race according to them, American society does not spend much time analysing the history of our racial divisions, and America prefers to believe in the inevitable progression towards racial equality.
It was also Moses' sin too. He crossed races. That was a sin for them. Because of this, he may have lost the Priesthood of Israel to Aaron. The Aaronids held the priesthood for ever after.
Despite being defined by race according to them, American society does not spend much time analysing the history of our racial divisions, and America prefers to believe in the inevitable progression towards racial equality.
The 1619 Project NYT liberal Jews tagged the US and the West with Original Sin. Why? The shields are up on anti Semitism, and they have forced a pivot to white negro racism, as a last ditch, really, to only protect themselves, in a gathering storm of Western Europe and American white populist rage, at the backlash from helter skelter rogue migrations of avalanches of starving color into both Europe and into the US.
Once a few Jewish synagogues were attacked in the past few years, that decision was inevitable: it is them or us, and they have highlighted, justifiably, but also really thrown into high relief with The 1619 Project, white atrocities against negroes. They have acted in Jewish self defense, not to protect the negro, as Tocqueville had noted, but you can kid yourself.
Eg.: Hillary Clinton, NY Dem Congress primary. Just wholeheartedly backed Engel a Democratic Jewish hardliner, a virtual jared Kushner, against a negro Justice Democrat Bowman. That's the NYT too, the same NYT.
Once a few Jewish synagogues were attacked in the past few years, that decision was inevitable: it is them or us, and they have highlighted, justifiably, but also really thrown into high relief with The 1619 Project, white atrocities against negroes. They have acted in Jewish self defense, not to protect the negro, as Tocqueville had noted, but you can kid yourself.
Eg.: Hillary Clinton, NY Dem Congress primary. Just wholeheartedly backed Engel a Democratic Jewish hardliner, a virtual jared Kushner, against a negro Justice Democrat Bowman. That's the NYT too, the same NYT.
There is no way out of Original Sin. That is what, after all, it means. It goes to the end of time.
Confronting original sin cannot do anything to make anyone move forward anywhere anytime anyplace.
Barrett BBC and the NYT 1619 Project are Krugman morons if they think anyone ever comes out of original sin by confronting it or by effort.
In fact if you work at it, you only make it worse, set it front and center above all things in your spiritual life, consumed by it, but trust me it never ever goes away by trying.
The racial strife they are calling out as original sin is already permanent in human history. It can change, slowly, sometimes, but it will eventually change into a different key of racial strife, not go away, baby.
Once you admit something is original sin, your ass is done, you are toast! To the end of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment