Thursday, December 19, 2019
THE PROBLEM FOR WHIGS IS REVISIONISTS JAM NEW RESEARCH UP YOUR ASSES
Whiggism not only confronts revisionism as such, but what one might call Critical Whiggism, a Whiggism which sees the handwriting on the wall, so to speak.
David Reich is a great example, (RACE COMES BACK INTO HUMAN AND HOMINID PREHISTORY IN A HUGE WAY), Whiggishly intramurally slamming Whig anti colonialists, Cohn, Dirks, and their mainstream white guilt Whig anthropology, with genome findings of thousands of years old Hindu hard caste stratified endogamy, not white British colonial domination.
The other biggie, re Reich, he wants his Whig cake and eat it too, criticize other Whigs (eg Wade) too, and claim race is merely a social construct, and a recent one at that arising out of recent negro slavery by white males; but on the other hand there are real racial differences that are trivial, except when Reich (for medical reasons, etc) says they are not trivial at all!
Mainstream Whig anthropologists shown to have been bozos by later archaic human geneticist physicists.
Michael Lewis is a revisionist, implicating multiple disciplines, economics, investing, banking, sports economics, psychology, physiology, sociology, history, mathematics, philosophy.
Authors on VENONA and Soviet penetration, great revisionist examples, government and media penetration at the top, not just spies stealing docs. New Deal liberalism, and anti McCarthyism getting revised hard now.
Whig higher education and politics, revisionists slamming Whig political correctness, the Amherst Common Language Guide, the Pope even coming out as a revisionist traditionalist against such Whig pop postmodern nonsense.
Steingart, for a time, ditto, slamming the LIEO that has submerged the West.
Even someone like Beschloss critical on FDR, Whiggish but critical I think, cat-like instincts for danger ahead.
Butterfield, Clark, Ward-Perkins, Andrew, and Schroeder, etc.
Richard Elliott Friedman, biblical scholarship; The Bible Unearthed, revisionist archaeology.
Kennan, Ferguson.
Pillsbury....
Brill, but he's really a critical Whig, more than a revisionist, it seems: he will just queer fellow whigs, mainly.
Even Trump, clearly a revisionist, right or wrong.
David Reich is a great example, (RACE COMES BACK INTO HUMAN AND HOMINID PREHISTORY IN A HUGE WAY), Whiggishly intramurally slamming Whig anti colonialists, Cohn, Dirks, and their mainstream white guilt Whig anthropology, with genome findings of thousands of years old Hindu hard caste stratified endogamy, not white British colonial domination.
The other biggie, re Reich, he wants his Whig cake and eat it too, criticize other Whigs (eg Wade) too, and claim race is merely a social construct, and a recent one at that arising out of recent negro slavery by white males; but on the other hand there are real racial differences that are trivial, except when Reich (for medical reasons, etc) says they are not trivial at all!
Mainstream Whig anthropologists shown to have been bozos by later archaic human geneticist physicists.
Michael Lewis is a revisionist, implicating multiple disciplines, economics, investing, banking, sports economics, psychology, physiology, sociology, history, mathematics, philosophy.
Authors on VENONA and Soviet penetration, great revisionist examples, government and media penetration at the top, not just spies stealing docs. New Deal liberalism, and anti McCarthyism getting revised hard now.
Whig higher education and politics, revisionists slamming Whig political correctness, the Amherst Common Language Guide, the Pope even coming out as a revisionist traditionalist against such Whig pop postmodern nonsense.
Steingart, for a time, ditto, slamming the LIEO that has submerged the West.
Even someone like Beschloss critical on FDR, Whiggish but critical I think, cat-like instincts for danger ahead.
Butterfield, Clark, Ward-Perkins, Andrew, and Schroeder, etc.
Richard Elliott Friedman, biblical scholarship; The Bible Unearthed, revisionist archaeology.
Kennan, Ferguson.
Pillsbury....
Brill, but he's really a critical Whig, more than a revisionist, it seems: he will just queer fellow whigs, mainly.
Even Trump, clearly a revisionist, right or wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment