BOOMERBUSTER

BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO

Sunday, December 10, 2017

PAST BLASTS FROM 2012

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

RE FLANDERS BBC FORGET ABOUT GROWTH

Great idea, but too late to start thinking about this, 
now that prosperity possibilities 
under another paradigm 
have slipped away with globalization.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

RE NYT ARTICLE 7/27 STRIP CLUBS IN TAMPA ARE READY TO CASH IN

This is typical of Florida culture, as well as national culture.


Joe Redner, from whom we took one of his clubs for a project, adjacent to the Hyatt along the Courtney Campbell, is a classic example of a local government official candidate.

IN THIS COUNTRY INDIVIDUAL STATES CHARTER CORPORATIONS

Were it to become of use, say to extort concessions from MNCs, individual states in which they are incorporated would be the likeliest place to look for political leverage.


This leverage might be discovered and exploited somewhere at some time by "cash strapped states".


If I were a cash strapped state, I would extort the heck out of those MNCS incorporated in my state, or else, by state legislation, terminate the corporate charter. 


A first step might be to legally prevent corporations from transferring their corporate charter to another state. Prevent corporate forum shopping. Delaware was always a big corporate charter draw.


I believe that large corporations need generally to be unwound, especially the largest ones with global reach.


They no longer serve the general welfare here, to say the least.


Another scenario: cash strapped states go out of business as political entities, devolve back into "free cities" and ungoverned frontier areas; and corporations cease to be legal persons at that point.

VENUS WILLENDORF BEAUTIFUL UGLY PHILOSOPHERS AND OTHER THINGS

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/11/re-venus-of-willendorf-beauty-versus.html

GREAT STUFF BUT WAY TOO LATE FOR HOW THINGS HAVE GONE HERE OR ANYWHERE

http://www.marvel8ed.com/kleptocrats.html

cf also the virtues of private governance

ANOTHER BLAST FROM THE PAST GOLD STANDARD THUROW KINDLEBERGER

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/11/re-lester-thurow-future-of-capitalism.html

Saturday, July 28, 2012

RE SOVEREIGNTY AT BAY SEE ALSO PRIVATE GOVERNANCE

http://aei.pitt.edu/2851/1/102.pdf

Sounds great doesn't it, 
given how things have gone, 
with private very large firms, 
especially banks.


Kind of like letting the foxes into the hen houses everywhere.

RE RAYMOND VERNON A USEFUL UPDATE POLEMIC

Sovereignty@Bay

https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/files/?whdmsaction=public:main.file&fileID=4002

See David Kaiser's current post

DK:
"....High educational ideals created both its achievements and its audience. It is moribund now in the United States because no cultural values compete with market values,..."


Reading Randall Collins' works, see The Credential Society, Collins attempts to relate 'cultural capital' to an economic base, in a rough sense, to an economic market concept (but it has almost never been a real laissez faire marketplace out there) to account for cultural and political change over time. 


It seems to me that Collins' discussion is helpful for conceptualizing the role of culture, religion, education, media, and ethnic traditions, in a general sense, for economic and political dimensions.  


They are not identical, of course, culture and economic/political base, but distinctions and interactions are hard to conceptualize without circularity, ambiguity, superfluity, reductionism, etc. 


This discussion relates to my comments here about compartmentalization, specialization, and the remoteness, irrelevance, wastefulness, complexities, shapelessness, and obstructions of academic and educational fields, in relation to powerful movements of current history politics and commerce, which either ignore, bypass, pirate from, dissemble among, or hide behind them.


Collins' history squib of education in America is especially useful. 


His references, on everything, are insightful.


Term search compartmentalization, specialization, fragmented, fragmentation, etc.

NOT THAT I AM A BIG DEFENDER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

But it was hardly a surprise, unfortunately, to find that the manager and backers of Madonna, 


and her sacrilegious decadence, are Jewish American, and Israeli,  interests and charities.


Perhaps Gaga's reductionist sacrilegious and decadent follow- up career is similarly backed?


Perhaps themes here can be seen as related to themes broached today re cultural and market values, and my reference to Randall Collins' works.

JAMES GRANT INTERVIEW LINK

http://www.realecontv.com/videos/central-banks/a-visit-to-james-grants-office.html

Friday, July 27, 2012

Saturday, December 9, 2017

QUESTIONS RE DK CURRENT POST

"Men, few will be surprised to learn, are very concerned about the size of their penises, and often wonder how they might be increased. 
 
"Straight women, on the other hand, are much more likely to complain about excessively large penises than excessively small ones. 
 
"Women’s concerns about their appearance, on the other hand, have shifted.  The posterior has replaced the breasts as the main source of anxiety during the last decade, and women are more likely to worry that their rear end isn’t big enough." DK
 
Given these apparent statistical conclusions, could womens' complaints about penis size be connected, somehow, to their concerns about the small size of their posteriors, or not?

Correspondingly, how to square male concern with penis size with findings on its lack of use, large or small?

"Relatively few people seem to ask google why their partners want so much sex; instead, they (and especially women) often ask why their partner seems to want so little." DK

 
I am certain that my thoughtful readers can help with all of this social scientific data and inference.

SOUTH KOREA SUDDENLY HUGE!

EntryPageviews
South Korea

54
United States

5
Portugal

4
Morocco

3
Indonesia

2
France

1
Philippines

1
Poland

1
Singapore

1

TOCQUEVILLE DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA

"A democracy can only with great difficulty regulate the details of an important undertaking, persevere in a fixed design, and work out its execution in spite of serious obstacles."
 
Amen.

Tocqueville didn't even get to see the Civil War, baby.

Friday, December 8, 2017

MY READERS WHICH ARE MORE IMPORTANT?

Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers

ROOSKIES CAMEO APPEARANCE

EntryPageviews
United States

26
Russia

20
France

1
Morocco

1
Mexico

1
Ukraine

1

Thursday, December 7, 2017

TRUMP ORTHODOX JEWS HAVE QUEERED NYT LIBERAL JEWS

You can quote me. Say "Boomerbuster said." Rather like Simon says.

Say no more.

Terms search: you been queered, pivot

SOME MAY MISTAKENLY SUPPOSE THAT I FAVOR BANNON ECONOMIC NATIONALISM

That would be a big misunderstanding.

Although I tend toward economic nationalism, the time to have built such a nation, within a still dominant Western Civilization, is long gone, a century or so gone, now.
 
Bannon is a sort of Alcibiades.

He at least knows he's been queered by Asia, and he is mad as hell. That's how you feel when you been queered.

My favorite endgame, for Bannon, and for Snowden, would be if Putin were able to put both Snowden and Bannon in the same cell somewhere in Russia.

THOMAS L FRIEDMAN COPIED MY SAYING IN PART IT SEEMS

A few readers of my blog may note that my version had been a paraphrase of a famous line of Churchill's, about the role of the RAF in The Battle of Britain.

My version has broad application to Friedmanesque American led globalization.

Friedman's version in the article applies only to China and Israel, and only to Trump's giveaway to them.

My phrase "so quickly" can be omitted by Friedman, for his version, since what he is describing happened very recently indeed anyway.

You will note that Friedman kept my "for so little", a phrase missing, of course, also in Churchill's original.  The reason is that Friedman, as well as myself, turned Churchill's statement from a debt owed into something given or almost given away.

That is also how you know that Friedman copied my statement, because he transformed its essential meaning in the same way I had done.

He also omitted "Never in the history of human conflict", since he doesn't want to get into what I mean, as against his own globalist flat world giveaway agenda in general.

Perhaps he can come out with a Michael Pillsbury Fallacy mea culpa, book, saying something like "I preached globalization for the last 30 years but, only now, do I realize I was wrong".

Terms search, also: Steingart

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

TRUMP RECOGNIZES JERUSALEM ISRAEL'S CAPITOL 2000 YEARS LATER

Judgment of history, verdict of history....

Who was on the wrong side of history?

Pagan Roman Empire, apparently. Muhammad, ditto.
Many, quite justifiably, anti semitic Christians, Catholic, Protestant, or other, who, as an article of faith, believe that the Jews killed Jesus, and that the destruction of Jerusalem of the Jews by the Romans was sanctioned by God himself.

PAGEVIEW SNAPSHOT

EntryPageviews
United States

24
Morocco

7
France

4
Hungary

2
Indonesia

2
Ukraine

2
United Kingdom

1
Poland

1
Romania

1
Sweden

1

SCHLESINGER LIPPMANN ETC

Scientific humanism...

All seemingly very nice ideas...1914

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

HOBSON'S CHOICE

Poor but upright
or
Bourgeois but depraved?

WHAT MATTERS THIS OR THAT REASON

Monday, September 7, 2015

GLOBALIZATION AS THE CAUSE OF WAR NOT AS THE CAUSE OF PEACE

Let's focus on this theme for a while here, what do you say.

Back in the days of mercantilism, they could not really even distinguish trade from war. "What matters this or that reason..." At least they, back then, had a clearer concept of the relationship than contemporary specialized economics and other experts in other fields now do. Sad commentary on knowledge, specialization,  and history.

"As General Monck put it with military directness in demanding a renewal of war against the Dutch in 1662: ‘What matters this or that reason? What we want is more of the trade the Dutch now have.’ Trade meant wealth, wealth enabled one to wage war, war made possible yet more trade: who could resist the lure of this logic?”

“The British Way In Warfare: A Reappraisal”, The Causes Of War, Howard, 1983.

DUMB AND DUMBER LIBERALISM

You really have to look at the article below, in the context of European and world history, to see how bad it got, over the decades after 1760, until the culmination of dumb Western liberalism in the 20th Century.

If the European liberals, or what was left of The Old European Order, were dumb, their American spawn, at all times, were still dumber.


"Saturday, December 2, 2017



OLD KENNAN ARTICLE RE LIPPMANN

"Walter Lippmann, The New Republic, and the Russian Revolution", in Walter Lippmann and his Times"

BLACK HOLE GLOBALIZATION DOOMSDAY MACHINE

Early Star Trek.

SODOM AND GOMORRAH CELEBRITY LESBIAN ABUSE NEXT ON THE LIST

BLACK HOLE GLOBALIZATION AND THE LOGAN ACT

What sense does it make to talk about the Logan Act when your foreign adversaries now make most of your products and equipment, for either government or the private sector, and Americans must deal with them, at the highest levels, of either public or private correspondence, on a daily basis, often touching on matters of foreign affairs policy and commerce, both executive and legislative, of the United States?

Monday, December 4, 2017

SOROS' ENLIGHTENMENT FALLACY VERSUS MINE

See the post below from 2013.
 
I would add that Soros' distinction, for purposes of his concept of The Enlightenment Fallacy, between natural phenonena and human affairs, is erroneous.
 
My concept of an Enlightenment Fallacy is fully as applicable to the study of natural phenomena as to human affairs, since for certain purposes, the study of natural phenomena and human affairs are both prone to similar Enlightenment related weaknesses. This fact has revealed itself in spades in recent discussions of global warming, creationism, fake facts, fake news, etc.

Take a look also at books and lectures on the history of science as well. See for example The Teaching Company course entitled "Science Wars". That is rather good. "It touches some themes I have broached here, re terms search: compartmentalization, junk science, experts, multi disciplinary issues, disciplinary foundations, politics, philosophy of social science, Wittgenstein, metaphysics, history of science, ethics, religion, sophistry, and anti intellectualism."

Another trend which I have noted here in the past has been the cooptation of university science, as well as liberal arts, faculties by those whose agenda is dictated either by new more aggressive anti intellectual, or more aggressive market dominated, programs, or both.


Sunday, July 27, 2014
RE 1984
" I know it is the fashion to say that most of recorded history is lies anyway. I am willing to believe that history is for the most part inaccurate and biased, but what is peculiar to our own age is the abandonment of the idea that history COULD be truthfully written. In the past people deliberately lied, or they unconsciously coloured what they wrote, or they struggled after the truth, well knowing that they must make many mistakes; but in each case they believed that 'facts' existed and were more or less discoverable. And in practice there was always a considerable body of fact which would have been agreed to by almost everyone. If you look up the history of the last war in, for instance, the ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, you will find that a respectable amount of the material is drawn from German sources. A British and a German historian would disagree deeply on many things, even on fundamentals, but there would still be that body of, as it were, neutral fact on which neither would seriously challenge the other. It is just this common basis of agreement, with its implication that human beings are all one species of animal, that totalitarianism destroys. Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as 'the truth' exists. There is, for instance, no such thing as 'Science'. There is only 'German Science', 'Jewish Science', etc. The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but THE PAST. If the Leader says of such and such an event, 'It never happened'--well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five--well, two and two are five. This prospect frightens me much more than bombs--and after our experiences of the last few years that is not a frivolous statement." 1984 DK excerpt

Unfortunately, a war, even, won't get one automatically toward objective facts or truth. The old adage history was written by victors has some truth to it.  According to Orwell's reasoning, the last thing he would have said, were Hitler to have won, was that this German history was thus now historical truth.

Re scientific truth, as an objective standard, Stephen Goldman had some good lectures on the history of science, and its controversies,  within the context of European intellectual, mostly physical science and astronomy: "Science Wars", Teaching Company.

Re philosophy of social science, Winch had some useful essays, in Ethics and Action, struggling with problems of truth, method, and morality, through historical, scientific, and social transformation, what I would call, in one sense, a struggle for neutral scientific, and moral, explanations, across disciplines, academic and political factions, wars, civilizations even, and time, etc.,: "Man and Society In Hobbes And Rousseau", "Nature And Convention", "Witchcraft And Magic Among The Azande", "Understanding A Primitive Society",  etc., etc. Winch, of course, read and spoke both German and French; things which I, unfortunately, did  not.

Wikipedia: philosophy of social science, Peter Winch
 


"Saturday, June 8, 2013




David Kaiser's post, some time ago, re Soros, etc.

This was my favorite quote from Soros (in Kaiser's post):
 "Popper’s hidden assumption that freedom of speech and thought will produce a better understanding of reality is valid only for the study of natural phenomena. Extending it to human affairs is part of what I have called the 'Enlightenment fallacy.'"

A great insight. Commenting on Kaiser's current post, one might also call it the Free Press Fallacy, or even, say, The Drew Pearson Fallacy.

I would just call it The Karl Popper Fallacy, and let people wonder how far I mean to go on that.

I would add, to the elements of Soros' Enlightenment Fallacy, a faith in free, open, Smithian, (and eventually global), markets.

Yet, this addition sets me off from Soros and his, otherwise, and in other contexts, quite globalist tendencies.

Most liberals are not nationalists, deep down, but rather anti nationalist globalists, nowadays. It was not always so.

Let's put it this way, the Nazis gave nationalism an unnecessarily ugly rap.
(The Bolshevics somehow avoided this type of bad rap, largely because of the gross ignorance and naivete of Western regimes, and their conservatives, and their liberals.)

I would just advert, momentarily, to a great small book by Butterfield, in the enlightenment context, The Whig Interpretation Of History. (Maybe I'm just stuck, Tory like, on Regius Professors of History, or just stuck on Regius anything.)


In a similar vein, the ideas of the Founding Fathers, as Bailyn has pointed out, owed more to radical Protestantism, and the common law, (one could also add commercial self interests, including, preponderantly, smuggling, tax evasion, and slavery) than to enlightenment ideas per se.

Term search, if so inclined eg: Popper, Lorch"

































































































































































 




































































































































































































































































 

 

THUMBING THROUGH THE MONEY CULTURE 1991

When he published this, I was still a Public Defender...

Especially good is "Leveraged Rip-Off"

NYT SAYS LOGAN ACT CLEARLY APPLIES TO FLYNN AND TO ANYONE ELSE NYT CHOOSES

§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
1 Stat. 613, January 30, 1799, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).

Subsequently, Logan himself was appointed and then elected as a Democratic-Republican to the United States Senate from Pennsylvania, and served from July 13, 1801, to March 3, 1807. He was unsuccessful in getting the Logan Act repealed. Despite the Logan Act, he went to England in 1810 on a private diplomatic mission as an emissary of peace in the period before the outbreak of the War of 1812, but was not successful.

See Wikipedia for a discussion.


It seems to me that the Act would be a useful tool, in the proper hands, for cleaning up the media itself!

Powerful media companies doubtless violate this law countless times in a week, on the international desks, and through foreign correspondents.

Politicians, and especially former politicians now lobbyists, not just Trump, but especially private corporate executives, violate it, constantly. Think tank guys, second nature to violate it....
Here is Trump:

In July 2016, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack accused Donald Trump of encouraging the Russian government to hack the email of Hillary Clinton, Trump's opponent in the 2016 presidential election. Several other Democratic Senators claimed Trump's comments appeared to violate the Logan Act

In 2006, the United States House Committee on Ethics warned departing members of the terms of the Act in an official Memorandum. The Committee commented in the Memorandum that the Act, "...has never been the basis of a prosecution, and this Committee has publicly questioned its constitutionality... Members should be aware, however, that the law remains on the books.

It is obviously a piece of shit, as drafted.

However, it seems ripe for wider, if unconstitutional, use, in a wide post McCarthyite sting, against rogue liberal journalists, and all politicians.

In 1975, Senators John Sparkman and George McGovern were accused of violating the Logan Act when they traveled to Cuba and met with officials there. In considering that case, the U.S. Department of State concluded:
The clear intent of this provision [Logan Act] is to prohibit unauthorized persons from intervening in disputes between the United States and foreign governments. Nothing in section 953 [Logan Act], however, would appear to restrict members of the Congress from engaging in discussions with foreign officials in pursuance of their legislative duties under the Constitution. In the case of Senators McGovern and Sparkman the executive branch, although it did not in any way encourage the Senators to go to Cuba, was fully informed of the nature and purpose of their visit, and had validated their passports for travel to that country.
Senator McGovern’s report of his discussions with Cuban officials states: "I made it clear that I had no authority to negotiate on behalf of the United States—that I had come to listen and learn..." (Cuban Realities: May 1975, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., August 1975). Senator Sparkman’s contacts with Cuban officials were conducted on a similar basis. The specific issues raised by the Senators (e.g., the Southern Airways case; Luis Tiant’s desire to have his parents visit the United States) would, in any event, appear to fall within the second paragraph of Section 953.
Accordingly, the Department does not consider the activities of Senators Sparkman and McGovern to be inconsistent with the stipulations of Section 953

How bout SNL/ Alec Baldwin? Etc., the whole cast really.

Although the title of the act says private correspondence, the actual body of the law, which is the operative part, fails to so state.

This law is not limited, by its terms, only to private correspondence, whatever even that now can be taken to mean, at all. 

 

 
 

Sunday, December 3, 2017

OTHER DETERMINATION MARKET DETERMINATION SELF DETERMINATION

Why not counterpose something worthwhile to Self Determination?
 
The West did a horrible job of Other Determination, re WWI. Modern State of Israel, spawn of this, along with dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire, etc, etc, etc.
 
Ditto re WWII, leaving Eastern and Central Europe in Russia's hands, de facto Other Determination.
 
But hey, Self Determination has not worked either.
 
Believe me, Market Determination has been coming to a very very bad end.
 
 

THE BETRAYER SOCIETY LEAD US INTO BLACK HOLE GLOBALIZATION

The Betrayer Society. I hold these terms to be self evident.

Black Hole Globalization. I hold this term to be self evident.

I hold this truth to be self evident:

THE BETRAYER SOCIETY LEAD US INTO BLACK HOLE GLOBALIZATION.


CLASSIC WIDE RANGING OLD POSTS REPOST

Friday, October 6, 2017


RE STEINGART ETC

Friday, July 7, 2017


WHY NOT REPRISE THIS GREAT OLD POST FOR GERMAN AND RUSSIAN GUESTS?

Monday, May 11, 2015


RE TALKING PIKETTY AND STEINGART VERY DIFFERENT MECHANICAL ECONOMIC OUTCOMES

 In fairness to Piketty, he does at many places point out that there is nothing natural or spontaneous about certain economic phenomena re how shocks have been handled, etc., and that politics and other social sciences play a greater role than encompassed by mere economics. I was glad to see that he advocates a return to political economy.


Reconstruction was as little a mechanical, very long term, economic malaise, as The Marshall Plan was a very quick mechanical economic miracle.


The Morgenthau Plan for the South, the Marshall Plan for the Axis. All very mechanical.


Put differently, the North did to the South very much what the British did to India according to Steingart's lurid account. The big difference is that the South was part of the country whereas India was a colony.


Only a Western civ fool would do to its own South what Steingart claims the British did to India.


It's a Western Civ theme. Similarly for the Morgenthau Plan.


The West's plan should have included breaking up the Soviet Union in 1918.....and not thereafter boom anyone, anywhere else, you didn't have to boom, and were not prepared, later, if boomed, to confront militarily.


What Steingart says the British did to India should have been the standard going forward.


One needs to contrast Steingart's India passage with that of someone like Quigley, re Gandhi.

Friday, October 6, 2017


CLASSIC GLOBALIZATION REMARKS STEINGART RUSSIA ETC

Sunday, May 17, 2015
RE STEINGART
Steingart has a passage p 163 echoing my remark, "Never in the history of human conflict...."

"BUSINESS EXECUTIVES ARE LOATH TO DISCUSS..."GS

"Never before in history has there been such a massive transfer of knowledge--without war or conquest-- from one social group to another." GS
 

THESE WERE ESPECIALLY GOOD IN LIGHT OF SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS

September 8, 2013

MANOUEVERING FOR OPEN WW IV NOW LONG UNDER WAY

Early stages of this conflict began several years ago.

Monday, May 20, 2013


cyber war now long under way in a complex and interdependent global world

We mostly provided the tools.

As economists, and certain presidents, would say, this is a win win situation.

Never, in the field of human conflict, has so much been given away to so many, by so few, for so little, so quickly.

OLD POST OF OTHER POSTS SOMEONE SAW

Thursday, January 23, 2014

TAKE A LOOK AT THE US THEN TAKE A LOOK AT RUSSIA

Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers

classic someone saw

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

ROOSKIES BACK! MAYBE PARTITION ISSUE CAUGHT THEIR EYE

EntryPageviews
Russia

21
United States

20
Portugal

7
France

4
Poland

3
Bangladesh

1
Spain

1
Iran

1
Netherlands

1
Philippines

1

HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO AT NYT MULTICULTURALIST FREE PRESS AS PLAINTIFF WINS

Media, freedom of speech press, separation of church state, government in the sunshine:

Their Cake Was Not a First Amendment Issue
 
It's A Gay Gay Gay Government
 
The baker as Plaintiff loses, the press as Plaintiff wins.
 
The Judiciary never loses.

A post from 2016 places the issue, of discrimination in a multiculturalist society, in a wider context, nicely:

"Saturday, December 10, 2016

RACIST UNIRACIALISM UNIRELIGIONISM GLOBALISM MELTINGPOTISM

Civilizationalism has become a racial slur under modern American uniracialism, which goes well beyond even the old American multiculturalism, to a whole other unheard of level, and is itself a form of racism, although still well disguised, in that it defines all racial distinctions, for whatever reasons, be they civilizational, national, religious, traditional, historical, ethnic, cultural,  political, or social, other than uniracialism as racist.
 
That is also why uniracialism is also racist, but in a new way, and is an important implication: uniracialism actively discriminates, both religiously, socially and politically,  against each and every distinct race, either now in being, or ever in being in the past.

Liberty, equality, fraternity, unirace, unitarianism, meltingpot ism"

Call it radical globalism, radical uniracialism, scientific humanism, it goes by many names, many more than this, glibalist liberalism, multiculturalism, atheism, etc., democratic globalism, a myriad of descriptive terms spring to mind, unitarian universalism, etc, Enlightenment Humanism.

Soros had called it, criticizing Popper, with reference to freedom of the press and speech, The Enlightenment Fallacy. Here's an old post also referencing DK:

Saturday, June 8, 2013

See A kindred spirit

David Kaiser's post, some time ago, re Soros, etc.

This was my favorite quote from Soros (in Kaiser's post):
 "Popper’s hidden assumption that freedom of speech and thought will produce a better understanding of reality is valid only for the study of natural phenomena. Extending it to human affairs is part of what I have called the 'Enlightenment fallacy.'"

A great insight. Commenting on Kaiser's current post, one might also call it the Free Press Fallacy, or even, say, The Drew Pearson Fallacy.

I would just call it The Karl Popper Fallacy, and let people wonder how far I mean to go on that.

I would add, to the elements of Soros' Enlightenment Fallacy, a faith in free, open, Smithian, (and eventually global), markets.

Yet, this addition sets me off from Soros and his, otherwise, and in other contexts, quite globalist tendencies.

Most liberals are not nationalists, deep down, but rather anti nationalist globalists, nowadays. It was not always so.

Let's put it this way, the Nazis gave nationalism an unnecessarily ugly rap.

(The Bolshevics somehow avoided this type of bad rap, largely because of the gross ignorance and naivete of Western regimes, and their conservatives, and their liberals.)

I would just advert, momentarily, to a great small book by Butterfield, in the enlightenment context, The Whig Interpretation Of History. (Maybe I'm just stuck, Tory like, on Regius Professors of History, or just stuck on Regius anything.)


In a similar vein, the ideas of the Founding Fathers, as Bailyn has pointed out, owed more to radical Protestantism, and the common law, (one could also add commercial self interests, including, preponderantly, smuggling, tax evasion, and slavery) than to enlightenment ideas per se.

Term search, if so inclined eg: Popper, Lorch

 

Saturday, December 2, 2017

RE IT'S A GAY GAY GAY GOVERNMENT I TOLD YOU SO

Say no more.

THEY LOVE THIS OLD POST

"Monday, November 10, 2014


RE THE DARIO D' ATTILI FALLACY OF VIOLIN EXPERTISE BUBBLE"

 

How about this new idea:
 
A new Cremona old violin examination conference:
 
"Joseph Guarneri His Work and his Master".
 
Participants are invited to drag their old  "Andreas Gisalbertis", or "Santo Ballarinis", along to Cremona, say in Spring 2018, to compare and contrast their similarities and differences from other violins also brought by others, opined by various different experts to be probably or perhaps or attributed to Joseph Guarierius or a member of his family or his workshop or school.
 
John Thornton could be one of the featured speakers.....
 
We could ask, say, Beare, or one of several others I can think of, say Roger Hargrave, to do a rebuttal or rejoinder or even to agree with Thornton and with Petherick. Reuning and Landon might make cameo appearances....

Who knows, the Cremona Guarneris might eventually be discovered to have hailed originally from Brescia.

 

RAMMING HOME THE MILITARY BUDGET ON USSR WHILE BEING ECONOMICALLY FRIGGED BY ASIA

US Cold War foreign policy.

You can candy coat it.

CHINA RUSSIA WEST ISLAM HINDU AFRICA GUY ON A BUFFALO

State of nature, now:

China, guy.

Buffalo, The West

Bear, Russia.

Mountain lion, Islam.

Indian: Black Africa, Hindu India

The Saloon, the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ4T9CQA0UM&list=PLEDC892CD6D9651B0

THE BBC MOSTLY TELLS ITS READERS NOTHING MUCH OF ANY IMPORTANCE

I call that fake news

OLD KENNAN ARTICLE RE LIPPMANN

"Walter Lippmann, The New Republic, and the Russian Revolution", in Walter Lippmann and his Times

Friday, December 1, 2017

GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE

Politicians can't take a poop except in the sunshine here.
 
I can actually give you a technical discussion about how, and why, legally, this has come to be the case, especially at the local government board or council level.
 
Federal officials often think they have more leeway, whereas locals clearly are like ducks in a barrel for the local media.

Terms search: government sunshine

PARTITION RUSSIA YOU THINK ME CRAZY TO THINK IT ONCE A GOOD IDEA

Not at all a new idea. Not even that recent.
 
I am in quite good, if disagreeable, company.....CALL IT THE VERDICT OF HISTORY
 
Too bad such ideas were never really put into effect.We tried again, weakly, in 1918, after the Bolshis took over. 
 
We are living in a world of fallout from those failures, among others.
 
Take a look at Schroeder, Austria, Great Britain, and the Crimean War, p 147, and Appendix B, The Bunsen Affair.

Schroeder thought the idea crazy too.

Who was crazy, Schroeder or me?

You will see who was on the wrong side of history very very soon.

Putin has been treating our highest officials as his puppets.....

Stalin had done the same, really....

You can candy coat it.....

Xi, dittohead. Ever since Nixon, they are

The Laughing Heirs!

Smell the coffee, game over!

FREE RIDERS CLASSIC OLD REFERENCES AND NEW

"Friday, September 9, 2016


AMERICANS USED TO CALL THEM FREE RIDERS

Terms search: Huan Trading cartoon to see who's riding who."


TERMS SEARCH: FREE RIDERS

VIDEO REFERENCE: STATE OF NATURE

MOVING ON FROM: NO VEMBER