REICH IS NOW CALLING STEPPE MALE ANCESTRY INTO INDIA "EXCESS STEPPE ANCESTRY"
It is pejorative........read his book.
Why, then, shouldn't the enormous Yamnaha dispersion itself, throughout West Central Eurasia, Western Eurasia, and South Asia, be emblematic of excess Steppe ancestry in general, and then the further question emerges, what is excess or defect (Aristotle's terminology) ancestry, after all?
Wouldn't any steppe ancestry, not just male but also male or female, be seen as excessive from the prehistoric perspectives of the multitude of subcontinent endogamies, similarly for the endogamies of the Jews, as Wade is also at pains to note?
No comments:
Post a Comment