This is just one direction in which one could already see things have been going.
Why not, for instance, marital bestiality? After all animal rights is still gathering force. Can't one leave everything to one's pet, under certain circumstances? If not, why not?
Answer, only some states allow pets as beneficiaries; sounds like another issue for the Supreme Court.
(Extra credit: Does it matter, then, in which state the pet is
' domiciled ', or even whether the issue of domicile has been raised by an ' ostensible pet domiciliary state '?)
Triads, quadrads, etc.?
Americans, in particular, have poor, complex, and conflicting, social regulatory controls.
No comments:
Post a Comment