It's hard to find anything really credible in things he writes.
He associates 'science' with 'cap-and-trade'.
That is about the last thing I would have thought of, regarding the term 'science' .
CAT has much more to do with marketizing so called environmentalism (neither real environmentalism; nor in the CAT context, real science),
removing the authority of government over a crucial area,
and overwhelmingly about booming,
and also most importantly bubblelizing,
globalization
with huge cap-and-trade driven developmental industrialization growth
elsewhere.
The main 'science' being discussed here is not actually environmental science, except incidentally, but
laissez faire free market economics, for carbon credits, etc., , once again.
Unfortunately, someone like David Brooks, an armchair 'science' pundit, who dishes out small narrow bits of 'science' insights as from a cafeteria menu, cannot help Friedman here, with his science terminology problem, or with his similarly Republican political gloss on that subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment