BOOMERBUSTER

BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO

Monday, July 30, 2018

AUDIENCE TODAY NOW

EntryPageviews
United States
133
Russia
61
Portugal
11
France
8
Spain
2
Ukraine
2
Poland
1

SURPRISE US MILITARY DRAWS DO NOT BUY LIST FOR SOFTWARE SURPRISE

You stupid bastards.... 

Any idiot could have already seen this coming, back in the 80s.

Let's just go down a short list of who's responsible here:
The government
The military
The private tech sector
The banking sector and Wall Street analysts
The media

That's the short list of who's really really responsible.
Basically, it's your whole Goddamned society, at the top.

Question: Is the military, which has now blown the IT whistle, technically now a whistleblower sector?

IF CALIFORNIA BURNS DOWN EVANGELISTS WILL SAY THE JUDGMENT OF GOD

Sodom and Gomorrah....
'Ain't nobody straight in LA'....
.........Wrath of God!

The judgment, or verdict, of history....and also, of God!

Great historians don't argue with history. DK

....or with God?

LA FEMME JAPONAISE OU CHINOISE, CA NE FAIT RIEN!

NO HAY PROBLEMA SHUT DOWN GREAT STUFF

SNL THE CALIFORNIANS WILDFIRE DIALOGUE IV

Stewart: Wi'r u warin uh kilt, Devin?
Devin: Thay sey its coulur, fur th crowin jowls.
Stewart: Ware yu groin?
Devin: Gotta git sommor cold fruit salud!
Stewart: Don ask me howtu git thar. Fires everwheare!
Devin: Iwon, asshole!
Stewart: Ben ice no win ya.

THE GLOBAL LEOPARD MAN ARISTOCRACY

Re DK post The Global Aristocracy




Sunday, July 29, 2018


RE HACKING THE MENU IMPERATIVE

RE PUTIN US HACK CLAIMS INDECENT SHOW HOW WE KNOW LEOPARD MAN HACKING DIALOGUE

Putin: "So they hacked our Embassy for hacking! So what?"
Lieutenant: "Don't we hack them too?"
Putin: "No. Soon Trump lets us hack all we want!"
Lieutenant: "Why?"
Putin: "He's a Leopard Man too!"
Lieutenant: "I get cooking pots!"
Putin: "We eat journalists. Too many of them: Jungle Forces."

Terms search: leopard crocodile man Genereal Butt Naked

INDIA STRIPS 4 MILLION OF CITIZENSHIP NOT NEARLY ENOUGH BABY

They should export those bastards to Russia, or China.

I have a very liberal migration policy.

I can think of a lot of places I'd like to send about 20 million Mexicans (Not the ones here, you idiot. The ones still down there!).

RE DK THE DEATH OF A GENERATION GREAT RANT GLAUCON X

"You emphasize the importance of FDR and WW2 as essential to the formation of a bond between the government and the people, and to a commitment to the idea of “the right to a decent home and a living wage for every American." But both the FDR presidency and WW2 were one time events whose influence was bound to fade, and their impact appears to have been shallower than you seem to assume. What happened was Americans reverted to the values that dominated before FDR. These were the values of rugged individualism, Social Darwinism, and unregulated capitalism--anti-social and anti-government values with no commitment to maintaining a middle class. America is on track to resemble Mexico both demographically and economically, and there isn’t going to be any heroic generation that will magically come along and reestablish the quaint values of the New Deal. We're just a banana republic with nukes now." Glaucon X

My own views on these various topics differ markedly from both GX and DK.

Re housing:
'New home construction declined dramatically during the Great Depression as rents rose, reaching an all-time high in 1940. A persistent housing shortage continuing into the early 1950s forced families to separate and apartment dwellers to “double-up.” The housing reform movement, largely ineffectual in the 1920s and 1930s, gathered strength in the postwar period. Labor and veteran groups pressured Congress and the White House to enact a comprehensive housing policy with money for public housing and continued wartime rent control. President Harry S. Truman, echoing reformers, wrote to Congress, “A decent standard of housing for all is one of the irreducible obligations of modern civilization.” Despite opposition from real estate interests, the Housing Act of 1949 passed. Although the Act called for the construction of 810,000 units of public housing over six years—and two additional housing acts in 1961 and 1965 promised substantial increases—by the mid-1960s, more people lived in substandard housing than in 1949. In addition, many blamed public housing itself for destroying neighborhoods and fostering social problems. In the following 1947 testimony before a joint Congressional committee, including Frank L. Sundstrom, Representative of New Jersey, created by anti-housing reform legislators to stall action, New Jersey spokespersons for tenants quoted the proposed Taft-Ellender-Wagner legislation and described housing conditions, while a number of tenants related their own difficult living situations.'

Wages, pretty damn sad story:
https://equitablegrowth.org/intellectual-history-minimum-wage-overtime/

AUDIENCE TODAY

EntryPageviews
United States
135
Russia
21
France
13
Portugal
11
Poland
2
Ukraine
2
Czechia
1
Spain
1
Italy
1
Thailand
1

Sunday, July 29, 2018

SNL THE CALIFORNIANS WILDFIRE DIALOGUE III

Stuart (gender undetermined): Why'd yu tell im dat, Devin?
He's gonna be fried ur boild!
Devin: I culdn't hep it, Stewwart!
Stuart: Ok Devin, yur reeeetardardedd!
Devin: I kno I no. Humeans kno win dey retroarded.

Dish pose deadcatated tu Adumb Sandnurd.

PBROWER2A1 DK DEMOCRACY FOIBLES WHIG WAG THE DOG


"...It was the victory of the colonists on a democratic platform that gave democracy a long-term push in Europe. Without that victory Britain certainly wouldn't have reformed Parliament any earlier than they did...." DK excerpt, reply to pbrower2a1

The colonists were technically not operating on a democratic platform, as we think of it at all. This becomes clear if one reads things like Bailyn, and especially Clark. Palmer was confused about the 18th Century antecedents of colonial rebellion, thinking of them at times in class and democratic terms. They were basically late versions of commonwealthmen of various fringe heterodox religious persuasions.

The victory of England's great power enemies (not the colonists) gave democracy no push in Europe not already there. The French Revolution did so.

Britain moved to reform Parliament only after the Napoleonic Wars. The same forces within British political and religious history which had led to the colonial rebellion eventually led in turn to Parliamentary reform, not anything much the colonists either did or said. For the British, the success of the rebellion was a lesson in laxity not liberalism.

EMANCIPATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION


Freeing the slaves without even transportation, much less compensation, as a war tactic, was The Big Betrayal, a thing American Presidents have always been good at.

It is also, coincidentally, the very kind of thing of which the colonists had accused the Crown, Ministry, and Parliament, and the main thing they had rebelled about in the first place!

The colonists, before the American Rebellion, were the most lightly taxed people in history! Allison, The Teaching Company, Before 1776

RE HACKING THE MENU IMPERATIVE

RE PUTIN US HACK CLAIMS INDECENT SHOW HOW WE KNOW LEOPARD MAN HACKING DIALOGUE

Putin: "So they hacked our Embassy for hacking! So what?"
Lieutenant: "Don't we hack them too?"
Putin: "No. Soon Trump lets us hack all we want!"
Lieutenant: "Why?"
Putin: "He's a Leopard Man too!"
Lieutenant: "I get cooking pots!"
Putin: "We eat journalists. Too many of them: Jungle Forces."

RE NYT CHURCHMILITANT.COM ARTICLE

All this is fascinating.
 
They, ChurchMilitant.com, apparently claimed that the covenant with God was broken with the destruction of the Temple. Later Judaism was man made, they say.
 
Fair enough.
 
Then Christianity itself was largely man made too, by Paul,  before the destruction of the Temple, and then man made embellished mostly after.

Question:
Why, then, was not the mission to the Gentiles, based as it certainly was, on that same covenant, also abrogated with the destruction of the Temple?

Do not say, Paul's message was not based on the Jewish covenant. 

Do not say, the destruction of the Temple confirmed the later message of a new covenant in Jesus. That was after Paul. He claimed Jesus fulfilled the covenant made with Israel.

NYT TRUMP WHO ARE THE ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE?

Sulzberger says to Trump don't call journalists enemies of the people. Nothing more ridiculous can be imagined.

It has only been the overwhelming power of this debauched media within our system which has kept the perennially weak American system from gutting it long ago. 

The reason is that the big interests, not necessarily those of this or that President, have been in bed with the media since the beginning.

It has not been a media of, by, or for, the American people, but rather a media for the false utopian globalist people of Priestley and Paine.

What have they not called him?

While touting the need to drain the swamp, why not drain the media too. They are very much the same.

Let's just have a little history lesson.

So called radical journalism has a long history. It wasn't called radical until the early 19th Century. It meant religious radicalism.

The so called (anachronism) radicals of the 18th Century, who were the main influence on the founding fathers, were marginal heterodox Christians of one stripe or another. 

They weren't democrats, or levellers, they were often basically commonwealthmen, restless young lower gentry, after the age of the commonwealthmen had seemed to pass. They did not believe in universal suffrage, even for white men. The Younger Pitt himself was a sort of throwback to this lost mental world.

By the early 19th Century, the more extreme of these heterodox (often tending toward atheistic) quasi Christians were sometimes also described as democrats or, after 1789, Jacobins.

They often wanted not only statelessness but also churchlessness, in a utopian world of natural and equal rights for all people everywhere.

Those utopian 'all of the people everywhere', Price's, Priestley's, quintessentially, are also the we the people of the founding fathers. They meant the same thing, back then, to the religiously heterodox. Tom Paine, etc.

For these religiously heterodox, both in England and in the colonies, the King, above all, was the so called enemy of the people for specifically these people, not for all Englishmen, far from it, or even for all colonists, among whom there remained many loyalists. 

They had also, somewhat incredibly, started calling the Anglican clergy enemies of the people; and of course they poured scorn on the Papacy from the beginning of the Henrician Reformation.

SNL THE CALIFORNIANS WILDFIRE DIALOGUE II

Stuart: How dyu tellim to get thare?
Devin: I toldim take th freewaaaay over to Sunset, turn left a Vine an keep goin til he sees it.
Stuart: That's not th waaay to the liquor store Devin! 
Thers a wilefir ova thea!
Devin: I know! He desurvs it! He's ouar prodeucaur! 
Mebee he can jump ina heated pool wi u gud soun systm, th faerie queen!

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

STILL FARTHER BACK DISNEY HOLLYWOOD MADISON AVE POST WWII HOME EC

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

OLD 2013 POST
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
WESTERN MARKET CAPITALIST CULTURAL SOCIAL CONVERGENCE


Big picture: it represents the popularized devolution of the long, previous, bourgeoisfication of what were once strictly aristocratic 18th Century ways of dress address behavior and leisure under the ancien regime.

CLASSIC LIBERAL NYT NYR LGBT PUTIN PUNDIT BASHER TAR BABY!

Masha Gessen, gay Jew Russian voluntary expat here..

Wow, what a twisted witch...just get a load of her mere appearance on video interviews.

She would put respectable gay women here off their lunch!

This is just the kind of witch who could drive gullible vital center American folk right into Putin's arms.

Oh, surprise! He already knows that!

She's like a fucking Tar Baby!

SNL THE CALIFORNIANS WILDFIRE DIALOGUE

Stuart: Sheriff jus called. We lost her!
Devin: Hoaw, Sturt, haow?
Stuart: Took a rong tuurn!
Devin: Goin for mayonnaise!