TAKE A LOOK IN THE MIRROR

When Chinese leaders advise Chinese expats and those living abroad temporarily, and ethnic Chinese everywhere, to take a look in the mirror, and try to influence their behavior accordingly, American human rights hawks would say that is sort of a proto human rights violation.

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2015/11/re-huntington-corrollary.html

RE MAFIA KENNEDY CONNECTIONS

See interview w G Robert Blakey.

Sometimes the truth takes a long time to come out, if ever.

Also see National Geographic article, 2013.

Ragano's book is also required reading. 

As a new business lawyer associate, my boss gave me an office next to Ragano's, 1984. Comical really. I had zero interest in organized crime, being mainly interested in civil litigation and trial work. I didn't even know, frankly, how notorious Ragano was. Of course I knew he represented underworld figures. My boss said he rented him an office because he felt sorry for him. I never had a significant conversation with him, but was polite in the building when we passed in the hall or lobby.

RE HUNTINGTON CORROLLARY

Because our constitution now promotes and or requires race, ethnicity, national origin, and religion blindness, we are not even in a position, politically, to address our own or other civilizations' legitimate concerns for such distinctions generally except to deny their validity.

DK ILLUMINATING PASSAGE

"When Communism fell in 1990, as I have noted repeatedly here, the US assumed that our values and our influence were now supreme,. Others felt differently.  Both the Chinese and Russian governments have repeatedly made clear that they do not accept this view, and that they are especially opposed to the idea that the world has a right to depose authoritarian governments on the grounds of human rights violations.  Ironically, in so doing, they, not we, are standing up for the original principles of the UN, which was based, as it had to be, on respect for national sovereignty.  Putin has spoken repeatedly and tellingly about the weaknesses in the U.S. world view.  Last year, he decided to show us that we could not simply promote a pro-western government in Ukraine, annexing the Crimea and starting a border war.  Now he has taken another huge step: adapting American principles for his own purposes in Syria...." DK 

See my prior post  and my comment below, re Ed Boyle's rant:

"....take a look at our constitution. It abhors nation states, monarchies, imperial powers, colonial power, and regional power. The only kind of society it envisions, politically, is that of yoeman farmers, small merchants, tradesmen, and the learned professions and clergy. It did not like the plantation system or slavery, but started out stuck with them, from Virginia on down. It did not like the idea of cities, even though that is where most of the colonial political power had come to lie, but was stuck with them too."

Terms search

No vember

RE the 2010 post, things can take a long time to come home to roost.....

JAPAN CHINA SOUTH KOREA RESTORE TIES

Very predictable.

When it ever hits the fan, who goes with whom, do you think?

snapshot today

Entry	Pageviews
United States	20
Russia	10
France	2
Portugal	1

RE ED BOYLE

He does a well informed rant:

"I believe putin's proactive approach in ukraine plus syria and the alliance with china plus next phase of econ crisisand electoral phase in west is regeneration phase in generational cycle. USA loses hegemony via USD as trade and reserve currency and has to live within its means and borders. Putin, with shia, china, ex soviet states, india, south american countries who are all paranoid of long standing eurocolonialiasm and american neoimperialism will work loosely together to defeat nato/cia/ngo strategy of global control of trade, finance, media. We see chinese CHP coming into place to replace SWIFT, Russian weapons and strategy more effective than USA. Most important is the respect for other countries and long term chess like strategy of Putin which is missing in US, western capitals . We live from case to case, moment to moment. If you were to come clean on ukraine, you would dissect the first orange revolution and the maidan as a set up from NED/soros/PNAC to put nato on russian borders.However people only allow themselves to accept in their brains what does not disturb its working. Russia is evil, period, so it must be responsible for all that happened in ukraine. There are enough books on the subject uncovering the neonazi galician plot to genocide russian ethnics, led, unfortunately, by mainly jewish politicians and oligarchic warlords like yats, kolomoiski and our mrs. Nudelmann with her PNAC husband. Blame Putin all you like. He accepts Islam in Russia az long as it is conservative, not radical, accepts judaism, loves german culture, is a very religious person. The USA govt. is driven by madmen with agendas to destabilize and conquer eurasia, to weaken every possible regional power like china, EU, Iran, Russia. This is the opposite of the stated postwar aim of global stability and growth. Russia, China, India, Latins want to follow this policy but to acheive this must destroy USD and military dominance,. The next ten years will decide."

"The USA govt. is driven by madmen with agendas to destabilize and conquer eurasia, to weaken every possible regional power like china, EU, Iran, Russia." EB

What he says just above, sadly, hardly a new thing....take a look at our constitution. It abhors nation states, monarchies, imperial powers, colonial power, and regional power. The only kind of society it envisions, politically, is that of yoeman farmers, small merchants, tradesmen, and the learned professions and clergy. It did not like the plantation system or slavery, but started out stuck with them, from Virginia on down. It did not like the idea of cities, even though that is where most of the colonial political power had come to lie, but was stuck with them too.

THE MENU

Try a fino or Manzanilla gin Martini.  

Say 50 50, with large pimiento green olive.

Just a thot.

RANDY FERTEL GREAT STUFF

"...Even (Hermes's) farts."

HUNTINGTON CH 12 SOUTH CHINA SEA

He had some really good ideas, as well as considerable anticipation, way back in 1996.

One of them was what he called abstention, I will call it civilizational abstention, which is really what he meant.

For a variety of reasons, this is not a concept, as he pointed out, which the US is able or willing to do.

Why is that? Take some guesses. I'll give you a hint: start with our Constitution.

TERRITORIAL WATERS DOES NOT LOOK THAT CLOSE TO CHINA

unless China takes over the surrounding countries.....

RE SUBSTANCE VERSUS PROCEDURE IN DISTINGUISHING JURISDICTION LEGISLATURE VERSUS JUDICIARY

RE DAUBERT VERSUS FRYE IN FLORIDA:

It seems that my criticisms of these distinctions, in an unpublished article from many years ago, printed elsewhere here, have now been brought to a head.

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/search?q=struggle+jurisdiction

OF COURSE HUNTINGTON KENNAN CHINA

Huntington was not above falsifying recent history himself. 

Just one glaring example, ch 12 again, his discussion of civilizational conflict re China. The Clash, pb p 312 313.
'The emergence of China as the dominant power....contrary to American interests as they have been historically construed' Huntington

Nothing could be further from the truth.

He knew perfectly well this was false, much better than someone like myself.

I go with Kennan:

Kennan (1960s re 1900 ish, and later, until Mao): 

"Out of all these ingredients there was brewed the curious view of China that seems to have animated American statesmanship during the war; the picture of a helpless, deserving nation, for whose virtues we alone, among the great powers, had understanding, whose interests we had to sponsor in the face of Japanese enmity and British callousness, and whose grateful support in the postwar period we could take for granted as a mainstay of the world position we hoped to occupy.  China was, in fact, and on this we insisted with a most extraordinary vehemence, to be one of the future great powers--- one of what F.D.R. called the 'four world policemen'"

"In this highly subjective picture of the Chinese, there was no room for a whole series of historical and psychological realities.  There was no room for the physical ruthlessness that had characterized Chinese political life generally in recent decades; for the formidable psychological and political powers of the Chinese people themselves; for the strong streak of xenophobia in their nature; for the lessons of the Boxer Rebellion; for the extraordinary exploitative talent shown by Chinese factions, at all times, in turning outside aid to domestic political advantage."

"It was this idealized view of the Chinese, rather than any illusions about the relationship between the National Government and the Chinese Communists, which was most damaging to our Far Eastern policy.  We did, to be sure, underrate the depth of the antagonism between these two elements.  Our memories of what had transpired in 1927 were certainly shorter (if they existed at all) than were those of Mao and Chiang and Stalin.  There also seems to me to have been a certain naivete, but nothing worse, in our efforts to bring about a political compromise between these two factions, and to induce Stalin to join us in this effort....".  Russia and The West Under Lenin And Stalin, p 374.

HUNTINGTON WAS WHERE I FIRST SAW REFERENCE TO QUIGLEY

CENTRAL PRIVATE BANKS PREFER WEAK GOVERNMENTS WHICH DO NOT GO TO WAR

and do not have revolutions.......

That is the lesson of The House Of Rothschild, volume 1.

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2015/10/historically-america-is-based-on.html

RE MULTICULTURALISM ETC

See Huntington, The Clash, Ch 12, for example.

RE MULTICULTURALISM ETC

Perhaps some of you will ask, why question multiculturalism? There are reasons. 

I write this mainly for myself, not for you. So, I mainly say things that I feel required, for myself, to say, having read certain things, and thought about some things, here and there.

It is really a personal journal, so to speak.

RE MULTICULTURALISM END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

Multiculturalism is everywhere here.

One might say that the principle was written into our constitution.

The stake in the heart, so to speak, of Western Civilization.

FINISHING UP V1 THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD

Great book.

Re who owns BOE, here is an interesting discussion.

Of course it, BOE was ostensibly nationalized in 1946.

Is that the end of the story?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5oYba7zzVc

This youtube guy is wacko, re Zionism and his anti semitism, but interesting discussion of ownership of the BOE, those issues aside.