Why not export a shit load of fat poverino white Americans to Mexico, Central America, and
South America?
Melt that fucking pot into shit.
BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Wednesday, October 13, 2021
NYT ELISA GUTIERREZ WANTS UNLIMITED MEXICOSIBERIANS COMING IN GOOD FOR HER
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
JOYCE IN FINNEGAN'S WAKE MAKES A GOOD AND PROPER PIG'S BREAKFAST
OF THE ENCYCLOPEDISTS' ENLIGHTENMENT
Monday, October 11, 2021
THE ANTE BELLUM VITAL CENTER FELL APART WITH THE RISE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
That vital center had had a number of tenets, spelled out regarding race relations in Dred Scott.
It summarized the liberal, Enlightened, scientific, and progressive understandings of the times among Americans and Europeans.
NOBEL PEACE PRIZE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WOULD UP LONG AGO
The West has been betrayed and hollowed out by its sponsors, acolytes, adversaries and beneficiaries since its inception.
Few more farcical Wetern institutions exist.
COLUMBUS DAY WHAT WAS HIS ETHNICITY? HIS DESCENDANTS
Saturday, October 9, 2021
CLASSIC POST RE DK INTERVIEW WITH MAURY AND THE LACK OF JEWISH ENSLAVER CHRISTIAN ONLY "ORIGINAL SIN"
Friday, September 18, 2020
DK ACTIVISM THEN AND NOW PT II A FEW CITATIONS RE THE ORIGINS OF RACISM
Re The Wages of Whiteness, Kunzru, a half Hindu atheist, married to a Niponese expat, mentions Bacon's Rebellion.
This seems the start of one of the stories they tell IN THE 1619 PROJECT.
You can say it, this modern ideology, began way back with old Stokely Carmichael, and his term systemic racism. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation.
Now, Wikipedia calls it Institutional Racism, a distinctive feature under our liberal ideology only of Western white male dominated Civilization.
Their story is that racism itself as an idea only began, and only began first here in America, in the aftermath of Bacon's Rebellion.
Nothing more ridiculous can possibly be imagined. These folks claim that racism itself began with white folks here in America starting to think they had to distinguish negroes from themselves to properly feel good about enslaving them.
Then negro theorists came up with the notion that whiteness itself was a negro construct based on that "white oppression history".
I have discussed that there was little difference economically and physically between enslavement and indentured servitude, and that half white colonists were in much the same condition of servitude for terms of years as negro slaves were for life, but that is hardly to say or think that there weren't huge differences ethnically racially and culturally for and among those groups in the 17th Century, as even a casual look at even say White Over Black would show.
http://www.elegantbrain.com/edu4/classes/readings/depository/race/buck_brod_whiteness_jews.pdf
Pem Davidson Buck, author of Worked to the Bone, The Punishment Monopoly, citing Lerone Bennett, The Shaping of Black America;
See also, in the above page: The left Jewish hand in the black negro gloved fist, so to speak,
"How Jews Became White Folks", Karen Brodkin.
Brodkin is very very NYT.
I cannot find a wikipedia on her, but this one comes up quite well:
Whiteness studies, Wikipedia
WS teaches that if you are white, you are branded, literally in the flesh, with evidence of a kind of original sin. You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can't eradicate it. The goal of WS is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — and was most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University [sic, Ignatiev was a Ph.D. student and then a tutor at Harvard, but never a professor], now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.
Whiteness as a tabula rasa: In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote that "whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings".
Scholars in whiteness studies sometimes seriously undermine their arguments by interpreting historical evidence independent of its broader context (e.g., Karen Brodkin's examination of American anti-semitism largely neglects its roots in European anti-semitism).
Lest anyone think Jews have ever been clean of the taint, the original sin, of slave trading or slave owning, or slave concubinage, Jews were very big in the white European slave trade at one time, that trade having little or nothing to do with negroes, except that negro slaves competed no doubt in some markets with the slavic slaves the Jews either kept for themselves, sold to European Christians, or to Muslims. Thomas Sowell, Migrations and Cultures, pb., p 241, citing Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews, p. 280.
Jewish views on slavery, Wikipedia
Jews both owned and sometimes impregnated those fricking slavs, rather like Thomas Jefferson, even though it was quite against their Hebrew religion.
Jefferson, as a deist proto atheist had more latitude (late latitudinarianism).
Don't kid yourself.
The good part of the Carmichael story for Jews was that in 1619 there weren't any here to speak of, so any original racism sin was purely a gentile phenomnon. It was convenient to forget the history of Jewish slave trading in the dim past and elsewhere.
Britain, which is literally filled to brimming with foreign folks of color sucking on their system, buys the liberal Carmichael line hook, line, and sinker:
'Institutional racism was defined by Sir William Macpherson in the UK's Lawrence report (1999) as: "The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.'
Wikipedia, Institutional racism
Re The Wages of Whiteness, Kunzru, a half Hindu atheist, married to a Niponese expat, mentions Bacon's Rebellion.
This seems the start of one of the stories they tell IN THE 1619 PROJECT.
You can say it, this modern ideology, began way back with old Stokely Carmichael, and his term systemic racism. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation.
Now, Wikipedia calls it Institutional Racism, a distinctive feature under our liberal ideology only of Western white male dominated Civilization.
Their story is that racism itself as an idea only began, and only began first here in America, in the aftermath of Bacon's Rebellion.
Nothing more ridiculous can possibly be imagined. These folks claim that racism itself began with white folks here in America starting to think they had to distinguish negroes from themselves to properly feel good about enslaving them.
Then negro theorists came up with the notion that whiteness itself was a negro construct based on that "white oppression history".
I have discussed that there was little difference economically and physically between enslavement and indentured servitude, and that half white colonists were in much the same condition of servitude for terms of years as negro slaves were for life, but that is hardly to say or think that there weren't huge differences ethnically racially and culturally for and among those groups in the 17th Century, as even a casual look at even say White Over Black would show.
http://www.elegantbrain.com/edu4/classes/readings/depository/race/buck_brod_whiteness_jews.pdf
Pem Davidson Buck, author of Worked to the Bone, The Punishment Monopoly, citing Lerone Bennett, The Shaping of Black America;
See also, in the above page: The left Jewish hand in the black negro gloved fist, so to speak,
"How Jews Became White Folks", Karen Brodkin.
Brodkin is very very NYT.
I cannot find a wikipedia on her, but this one comes up quite well:
Whiteness studies, Wikipedia
WS teaches that if you are white, you are branded, literally in the flesh, with evidence of a kind of original sin. You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can't eradicate it. The goal of WS is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — and was most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University [sic, Ignatiev was a Ph.D. student and then a tutor at Harvard, but never a professor], now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.
Whiteness as a tabula rasa: In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote that "whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings".
Scholars in whiteness studies sometimes seriously undermine their arguments by interpreting historical evidence independent of its broader context (e.g., Karen Brodkin's examination of American anti-semitism largely neglects its roots in European anti-semitism).
Lest anyone think Jews have ever been clean of the taint, the original sin, of slave trading or slave owning, or slave concubinage, Jews were very big in the white European slave trade at one time, that trade having little or nothing to do with negroes, except that negro slaves competed no doubt in some markets with the slavic slaves the Jews either kept for themselves, sold to European Christians, or to Muslims. Thomas Sowell, Migrations and Cultures, pb., p 241, citing Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews, p. 280.
Jewish views on slavery, Wikipedia
Jews both owned and sometimes impregnated those fricking slavs, rather like Thomas Jefferson, even though it was quite against their Hebrew religion.
Jefferson, as a deist proto atheist had more latitude (late latitudinarianism).
Don't kid yourself.
The good part of the Carmichael story for Jews was that in 1619 there weren't any here to speak of, so any original racism sin was purely a gentile phenomnon. It was convenient to forget the history of Jewish slave trading in the dim past and elsewhere.
Britain, which is literally filled to brimming with foreign folks of color sucking on their system, buys the liberal Carmichael line hook, line, and sinker:
'Institutional racism was defined by Sir William Macpherson in the UK's Lawrence report (1999) as: "The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.'
Wikipedia, Institutional racism
Sunday, October 10, 2021
THE PROPER APPROACH TO WWII WOULD HAVE BEEN TO WHTHHOLD RESOURCES FROM STALIN
Choke to death Soviet agent Harry Hopkins,
Let Hltler overrun Russia to the Urals,
then gone in and finished Hltler off,
and keep the European Empires in place
as they had stood at the turn of the century.
As Kennan said around 1960, the Austro-Hungarian Empire had been better than anything that replaced it.
That remains quite true.
CHINA IS BETTER PLACED TO SCREW THE US THAN HITLER WAS FDR IN 1933
See Gerhard Weinberg, The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany, Diplomatic Revolution in Europe 1933-1936, p. 136 through 139:
"...The (US) bondholder was given the choice..." p. 137.
This choice was a Morton's Fork.
The FDR government, investors, and industries, financed and manufactured Nazi rearmaments and investments.
Weinberg's belief that FDR wanted to maintain good relations with Germany, implying he looked favorably on Germany in general, Hitler or no Hitler, before taking office, as much of the rest of the US had done before '33, is unwarranted.
FDR was personally repelled by Germans. His holidays spent there in the 20s were not about loving Germans at all. Beschloss, The Conquerors. One wonders why he chose to go there. Perhaps to hang with German internationalist socialists and communists, and their Stalinist backers. That would certainly have been his wife's preference.
FDR wasn't about negroes either, trust me, but the New Deal gives them no more basis for negro slave descendant reparations than anything else in their pathetic bestial and sordid quasi history and prehistory, and that number is zero basis.
Saturday, October 9, 2021
RACISM AND ENSLAVEMENT GO BACK TO THE PALEOLITHIC BUT PROBABLY LONG BEFORE
I am fairly certain that the first domesticated animals were enslaved archaic humans, not dogs.
Dogs came second, maybe third.
The best example to give, from recorded history, of large scale population enslavement, may be the helots, enslaved by the Spartans.
The Egyptians, and other Middle Eastern Civilizations, were known also in recorded history to rely extensively on slaves.
It is obvious that by that time, smaller scale human enslavement had had a very very long prehistory in many places all over the world.
The development of archaic human enslavement was almost certainly much more important, and probably antedated, the much more highly liberally touted development of agriculture, which in all probability relied from its very beginnings primarily in many places on enslaved labor.
It certainly did so, in early recorded history, among the Spartans, in the Peloponnese.
Other Greeks including the Athenians had slaves, but they were managed by individual landowner masters, unlike the more plantation type system the Spartans seem to have developed with the Helot population.
REUNIFICATION WITH TAIWAN GOOD SHIT! WHY NOT ANNEX JAPAN AND KOREA?
MANCHURIA LOOKS YUMMY!
CHINKS ARE GOBBLING VIETNAM, THAILAND, CAMBODIA, ETC:
DELICIOUS!
JACKIE MASON QUOTE
"Jews never enslaved anyone. That is not what Jews did. Muslims did. Jews made money on it. They made money on anything. Do you understand this?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ImX57bFpYU
ETC
Sunday, August 2, 2020
IF WHITE WESTERN CIVILIZATION IS BAD THEN ITS LONE ARGUMENT AGAINST SLAVERY ITSELF COLLAPSES
"WHILE SLAVERY WAS COMMON TO ALL CIVILIZATIONS, AS WELL AS PEOPLES CONSIDERED UNCIVILIZED, ONLY ONE CIVILIZATION DEVELOPED A MORAL REVULSION AGAINST IT, VERY LATE IN ITS HISTORY---WESTERN CIVILIZATION."
Sowell, Black Rednecks and White Liberals, p. 116.
Postscript incerpt, 8/5/20.
Here was DK, making a point similar to Sowell's, on the issue above:
It had been the white West itself which had objected to slavery, some white religious pundits claining that it was a sin. No negroes had ever claimed such a thing, certainly no negroes in Africa who continued their own slave trade regardless of what white traders thought or did for hundreds of years.
Postscript incerpt, 8/5/20.
Here was DK, making a point similar to Sowell's, on the issue above:
"...Let me take another paragraphs to introduce my own perspective. I became a comparative historian at an early age, not only comparing different countries in the same period of history, but comparing different periods of modern European history. A comparative perspective, it seem to me, is a good antidote to overly positive or negative views of human nature, since its judgments can be based upon reality. Now unless one returns to the most primitive hunter-gatherer societies, there seems to be little doubt that western civilization has been less oppressive, on the whole, than any other developed civilization. That is why movements for racial equality, equality between men and women, and, most recently, gay rights, originated in western civilization, and why such ideas have advanced the most in the most westernized countries..." DK
It had been the white West itself which had objected to slavery, some white religious pundits claining that it was a sin. No negroes had ever claimed such a thing, certainly no negroes in Africa who continued their own slave trade regardless of what white traders thought or did for hundreds of years.
In my view, this Western Civilizational revulsion, connected with other liberal Western political and theological agendas, is a kind of social behavior genetic mutation which has proven disastrous for the white people who carry it and perpetuate it, but which became culturally if not genetically fixed in the white people of the West, and has proved disastrous for the continued dominance of Western civilization itself.
Championing any rights, for anyone not of your own civilization, as an innovation, is a very dangerous game culturally to have played even if your genetic impulses sent you in that direction against the better judgment of some Westerners, and the West has now lost that game for good and forever.
Championing any rights, for anyone not of your own civilization, as an innovation, is a very dangerous game culturally to have played even if your genetic impulses sent you in that direction against the better judgment of some Westerners, and the West has now lost that game for good and forever.
The 1619 Project, continued.
This post is dedicated to Dylan Matthews and Jake Silverstein jointly.
Terms search: grateful, game over, smell the coffee
This post is dedicated to Dylan Matthews and Jake Silverstein jointly.
Terms search: grateful, game over, smell the coffee
CLASSIC POST RE DK INTERVIEW WITH MAURY AND THE LACK OF JEWISH ENSLAVER CHRISTIAN ONLY "ORIGINAL SIN"
Friday, September 18, 2020
DK ACTIVISM THEN AND NOW PT II A FEW CITATIONS RE THE ORIGINS OF RACISM
Re The Wages of Whiteness, Kunzru, a half Hindu atheist, married to a Niponese expat, mentions Bacon's Rebellion.
This seems the start of one of the stories they tell IN THE 1619 PROJECT.
You can say it, this modern ideology, began way back with old Stokely Carmichael, and his term systemic racism. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation.
Now, Wikipedia calls it Institutional Racism, a distinctive feature under our liberal ideology only of Western white male dominated Civilization.
Their story is that racism itself as an idea only began, and only began first here in America, in the aftermath of Bacon's Rebellion.
Nothing more ridiculous can possibly be imagined. These folks claim that racism itself began with white folks here in America starting to think they had to distinguish negroes from themselves to properly feel good about enslaving them.
Then negro theorists came up with the notion that whiteness itself was a negro construct based on that "white oppression history".
I have discussed that there was little difference economically and physically between enslavement and indentured servitude, and that half white colonists were in much the same condition of servitude for terms of years as negro slaves were for life, but that is hardly to say or think that there weren't huge differences ethnically racially and culturally for and among those groups in the 17th Century, as even a casual look at even say White Over Black would show.
http://www.elegantbrain.com/edu4/classes/readings/depository/race/buck_brod_whiteness_jews.pdf
Pem Davidson Buck, author of Worked to the Bone, The Punishment Monopoly, citing Lerone Bennett, The Shaping of Black America;
See also, in the above page: The left Jewish hand in the black negro gloved fist, so to speak,
"How Jews Became White Folks", Karen Brodkin.
Brodkin is very very NYT.
I cannot find a wikipedia on her, but this one comes up quite well:
Whiteness studies, Wikipedia
WS teaches that if you are white, you are branded, literally in the flesh, with evidence of a kind of original sin. You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can't eradicate it. The goal of WS is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — and was most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University [sic, Ignatiev was a Ph.D. student and then a tutor at Harvard, but never a professor], now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.
Whiteness as a tabula rasa: In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote that "whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings".
Scholars in whiteness studies sometimes seriously undermine their arguments by interpreting historical evidence independent of its broader context (e.g., Karen Brodkin's examination of American anti-semitism largely neglects its roots in European anti-semitism).
Lest anyone think Jews have ever been clean of the taint, the original sin, of slave trading or slave owning, or slave concubinage, Jews were very big in the white European slave trade at one time, that trade having little or nothing to do with negroes, except that negro slaves competed no doubt in some markets with the slavic slaves the Jews either kept for themselves, sold to European Christians, or to Muslims. Thomas Sowell, Migrations and Cultures, pb., p 241, citing Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews, p. 280.
Jewish views on slavery, Wikipedia
Jews both owned and sometimes impregnated those fricking slavs, rather like Thomas Jefferson, even though it was quite against their Hebrew religion.
Jefferson, as a deist proto atheist had more latitude (late latitudinarianism).
Don't kid yourself.
The good part of the Carmichael story for Jews was that in 1619 there weren't any here to speak of, so any original racism sin was purely a gentile phenomnon. It was convenient to forget the history of Jewish slave trading in the dim past and elsewhere.
Britain, which is literally filled to brimming with foreign folks of color sucking on their system, buys the liberal Carmichael line hook, line, and sinker:
'Institutional racism was defined by Sir William Macpherson in the UK's Lawrence report (1999) as: "The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.'
Wikipedia, Institutional racism
Re The Wages of Whiteness, Kunzru, a half Hindu atheist, married to a Niponese expat, mentions Bacon's Rebellion.
This seems the start of one of the stories they tell IN THE 1619 PROJECT.
You can say it, this modern ideology, began way back with old Stokely Carmichael, and his term systemic racism. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation.
Now, Wikipedia calls it Institutional Racism, a distinctive feature under our liberal ideology only of Western white male dominated Civilization.
Their story is that racism itself as an idea only began, and only began first here in America, in the aftermath of Bacon's Rebellion.
Nothing more ridiculous can possibly be imagined. These folks claim that racism itself began with white folks here in America starting to think they had to distinguish negroes from themselves to properly feel good about enslaving them.
Then negro theorists came up with the notion that whiteness itself was a negro construct based on that "white oppression history".
I have discussed that there was little difference economically and physically between enslavement and indentured servitude, and that half white colonists were in much the same condition of servitude for terms of years as negro slaves were for life, but that is hardly to say or think that there weren't huge differences ethnically racially and culturally for and among those groups in the 17th Century, as even a casual look at even say White Over Black would show.
http://www.elegantbrain.com/edu4/classes/readings/depository/race/buck_brod_whiteness_jews.pdf
Pem Davidson Buck, author of Worked to the Bone, The Punishment Monopoly, citing Lerone Bennett, The Shaping of Black America;
See also, in the above page: The left Jewish hand in the black negro gloved fist, so to speak,
"How Jews Became White Folks", Karen Brodkin.
Brodkin is very very NYT.
I cannot find a wikipedia on her, but this one comes up quite well:
Whiteness studies, Wikipedia
WS teaches that if you are white, you are branded, literally in the flesh, with evidence of a kind of original sin. You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can't eradicate it. The goal of WS is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — and was most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University [sic, Ignatiev was a Ph.D. student and then a tutor at Harvard, but never a professor], now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.
Whiteness as a tabula rasa: In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote that "whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings".
Scholars in whiteness studies sometimes seriously undermine their arguments by interpreting historical evidence independent of its broader context (e.g., Karen Brodkin's examination of American anti-semitism largely neglects its roots in European anti-semitism).
Lest anyone think Jews have ever been clean of the taint, the original sin, of slave trading or slave owning, or slave concubinage, Jews were very big in the white European slave trade at one time, that trade having little or nothing to do with negroes, except that negro slaves competed no doubt in some markets with the slavic slaves the Jews either kept for themselves, sold to European Christians, or to Muslims. Thomas Sowell, Migrations and Cultures, pb., p 241, citing Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews, p. 280.
Jewish views on slavery, Wikipedia
Jews both owned and sometimes impregnated those fricking slavs, rather like Thomas Jefferson, even though it was quite against their Hebrew religion.
Jefferson, as a deist proto atheist had more latitude (late latitudinarianism).
Don't kid yourself.
The good part of the Carmichael story for Jews was that in 1619 there weren't any here to speak of, so any original racism sin was purely a gentile phenomnon. It was convenient to forget the history of Jewish slave trading in the dim past and elsewhere.
Britain, which is literally filled to brimming with foreign folks of color sucking on their system, buys the liberal Carmichael line hook, line, and sinker:
'Institutional racism was defined by Sir William Macpherson in the UK's Lawrence report (1999) as: "The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.'
Wikipedia, Institutional racism
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
DUDE INVESTMENTS
SOLAR
GREEN ENERGY
RECYCLING
WIND POWER
HEDGES
CARBON CREDITS
NUCLEAR POWER
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
ETFS
CRYPTO
GOLD
REITS
ORGANIC FOOD
FOLK ARTS AND CRAFTS
ELECTRIC CARS
SMART CARS
SMART HOMES
AI
ROBOTICS
HEALTH FOOD
SMART ANYTHING
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)