You can claim that it also involved the idea of reason. This is quite true.
But reason is a term without a clear meaning.
1. a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.
SIMON SAYS REVISIONISM
THE NYT IS AND LONG HAS BEEN MODERNISM TURNED POSTMODERNIST.
IT IS THE KIND OF THING REVISIONISM, IN MODERN HISTORY AT LEAST, WAS ORIGINALLY DEFINED AS AGAINST.
IF ONE GOES FARTHER BACK, THE ORIGINAL EXPLOSION OF MODERNISM AND MODERN HISTORY ITSELF BEGAN AND AROSE OUT OF 18TH CENTURY LIBERAL AND LEFTIST REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY, MUCH OF IT COMING OUT OF GERMAN PHILOSOPHY AND ENLIGHTENMENT IDEAS BEFORE AND AFTER NAPOLEON.
MODERN REVISIONISM IS, AT LEAST IN THE HISTORY OF HISTORY, AN ATTEMPT TO CORRECT THE BANKRUPTCY, FALSIFICATION, AND REDUCTIONISM OF LIBERAL HISTORY AND IDEOLOGY, BOTH SINCE THE 18TH CENTURY, AND BEFORE.
THERE ARE VERY GOOD REVISIONIST HISTORIANS OF THE TUDOR AND REFORMATION PERIODS AS WELL AS LATER ONES: MC CAFFERY, CONYERS READ, COLLINGWOOD, ELTON, BUTTERFIELD, J C D CLARK, RUSSELL, ELLIOTT, J G RANDALL, BAILYN, ETC.
I CONSIDER PALMER A REVISIONIST OF SORTS, BUT CLARK TAKES ISSUE WITH HIM AS WHIGGISH IN THE AGE OF THE DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION. I, ON THE OTHER HAND, CONSIDER THE QUIBBLE SOMEWHAT INTRAMURAL AS BETWEEN REVISIONISTS. BUT ONE HAS TO APPEAR A WHIG HERE TO GET A BOOK PUBLISHED.
THESE ARE HARDLY ANTI VAXXER TRUMP REPUBLICAN TYPE PEOPLE. (MY PROFESSOR AT KINGS' WORK IN PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ETHICS, AND WITTGENSTEIN, WAS INFORMED BY THIS REVISIONIST TRADITION IN HISTORY, ESPECIALLY ELTON AND COLLINGWOOD.)
AND THEN, WHAT ABOUT THE LEFT ANTI VAXXER?
THE BLM THE 1619 PROJECT STAY WOKE LEFT GLOBALIST POSTMODERN ANTI-REVISIONIST REVISIONIST NEGRO AND WHITE LIBERAL STOKELYS?
THEY CLAIM THAT RIGHT REPUBLICAN AND TRUMPIST VAXXERS ARE TRYING TO EXTERMINATE NEGROES WITH VACCINES, A LA ROBERT KENNEDY JR?
ARE THOSE LERER WOULD CALL REVISIONISTS TOO?
LIBERAL NYT MEDIA'S USE OF THE TERM REVISIONISM, AS A MONIKER RATHER THAN A CORRECTIVE, FOR SHALLOW UNHISTORICAL REPUBLICAN PARTY PREJUDICES, IS AN INTENTIONAL EFFORT BY THE LIBERAL LEFT TO DEMONIZE THE TERM ITSELF, BY ATTACHING IT TO AND IDENTIFYING IT AS THE POLITICAL TAR BABY OF ANTI VAXXER REPUBLICANISM.
CALL IT THE INTRAMURALISM OF LEFT AGAINST RIGHT POSTMODERNISM, NOT REVISIONISM IN HISTORY.
You have to smell a rat.
Biden, in return, played the race wedgie card: negroes for Trump ain't black.
AS DK has now implied as well, "The Woke Rule the Media", these are two sides of the same NYT card.
The NYT can call out Trump wedgie Zionism on the Christian white right while nevertheless supporting Israel liberally and Jewishly simultaneously, calling out Christian center white Stokely stooges and negro stooges from the Woke Stokely negro racist NYT left.
Rich white democratic stooge Stokelys in Blue cities get called out as not equalitarian enough for these fricking dem liberal Hebrews.
It reminds me, frankly of the Angolans who closed a liberal Brazilian church because these Brazilian mulattoes weren't African enough for these Angolans!
Professor
Re castes...I believe Khashoggi had been given fair warning of transgression by the Saudi Crown, and had had meted out to him the outcome his subsequent actions must have richly deserved.
This should be the fate of many more journalists, all over the world, who consider themselves to be the ad hoc rulers within their realms.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BihuYWnzrIQ
Lightning strikes kill some 2,000 Indians on average every year, according to official data.
HALF A BILLION HINDUS, AT LEAST, DEFECATE IN THE OPEN.
MAYBE MORE AND BETTER VOTING CAN HELP!
MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE IS FOR LIGHTNING TO KILL MORE RICH HINDUS THAN POOR ONES!
THAT'S WHAT I CALL FIGHTING INEQUALITY.
Safety from French and Indian attack, and British fatigue, after the Seven Years War.
The cooperation of Great Powers in opposing Britain against the colonies.
The onset of the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars.
THAT IS WHAT I SUPPOSE.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME AND THEM IS THEY GET PAYED AND HAVE A BOSS AND ARE SERIOUS.
FUNNY THING, SPOOKS NEVER MAKE COMMENTS!
YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD THINK TO MAKE COMMENTS TO COVER THEIR SPOOK OBVIOUSNESS.
BUT NOOOOOOO! SPOOKS ARE DUMB AS FUCK.
Re The Wages of Whiteness, Kunzru, a half Hindu atheist, married to a Niponese expat, mentions Bacon's Rebellion.
This seems the start of one of the stories they tell IN THE 1619 PROJECT.
You can say it, this modern ideology, began way back with old Stokely Carmichael, and his term systemic racism. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation.
Now, Wikipedia calls it Institutional Racism, a distinctive feature under our liberal ideology only of Western white male dominated Civilization.
Their story is that racism itself as an idea only began, and only began first here in America, in the aftermath of Bacon's Rebellion.
Nothing more ridiculous can possibly be imagined. These folks claim that racism itself began with white folks here in America starting to think they had to distinguish negroes from themselves to properly feel good about enslaving them.
Then negro theorists came up with the notion that whiteness itself was a negro construct based on that "white oppression history".
I have discussed that there was little difference economically and physically between enslavement and indentured servitude, and that half white colonists were in much the same condition of servitude for terms of years as negro slaves were for life, but that is hardly to say or think that there weren't huge differences ethnically racially and culturally for and among those groups in the 17th Century, as even a casual look at even say White Over Black would show.
http://www.elegantbrain.com/edu4/classes/readings/depository/race/buck_brod_whiteness_jews.pdf
Pem Davidson Buck, author of Worked to the Bone, The Punishment Monopoly, citing Lerone Bennett, The Shaping of Black America;
See also, in the above page: The left Jewish hand in the black negro gloved fist, so to speak,
"How Jews Became White Folks", Karen Brodkin.
Brodkin is very very NYT.
I cannot find a wikipedia on her, but this one comes up quite well:
Whiteness studies, Wikipedia
WS teaches that if you are white, you are branded, literally in the flesh, with evidence of a kind of original sin. You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can't eradicate it. The goal of WS is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — and was most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, former professor at Harvard University [sic, Ignatiev was a Ph.D. student and then a tutor at Harvard, but never a professor], now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.
Whiteness as a tabula rasa: In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote that "whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings".
Scholars in whiteness studies sometimes seriously undermine their arguments by interpreting historical evidence independent of its broader context (e.g., Karen Brodkin's examination of American anti-semitism largely neglects its roots in European anti-semitism).
Lest anyone think Jews have ever been clean of the taint, the original sin, of slave trading or slave owning, or slave concubinage, Jews were very big in the white European slave trade at one time, that trade having little or nothing to do with negroes, except that negro slaves competed no doubt in some markets with the slavic slaves the Jews either kept for themselves, sold to European Christians, or to Muslims. Thomas Sowell, Migrations and Cultures, pb., p 241, citing Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews, p. 280.
Jewish views on slavery, Wikipedia
Jews both owned and sometimes impregnated those fricking slavs, rather like Thomas Jefferson, even though it was quite against their Hebrew religion.
Jefferson, as a deist proto atheist had more latitude (late latitudinarianism).
Don't kid yourself.
The good part of the Carmichael story for Jews was that in 1619 there weren't any here to speak of, so any original racism sin was purely a gentile phenomnon. It was convenient to forget the history of Jewish slave trading in the dim past and elsewhere.
Britain, which is literally filled to brimming with foreign folks of color sucking on their system, buys the liberal Carmichael line hook, line, and sinker:
'Institutional racism was defined by Sir William Macpherson in the UK's Lawrence report (1999) as: "The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.'
Wikipedia, Institutional racism
