https://ridenhour2020.eventbrite.com
BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Tuesday, September 29, 2020
THE SECRET SOCIETY IN BROAD DAYLIGHT AND WHAT IT CAN ACCOMPLISH THE 1619 PROJECT
FOLLOWING ON SEVERAL RECENT POSTS
I want to advert to the passage below, in the context of the accomplishments of the Republican Party, and of Lincoln.
"...In the last half century, many, though not all, historians, other academics, and now, journalists and op-ed writers, have gone in a different direction, arguing that hypocrisy was really the defining feature of what the American revolutionaries accomplished, and that none of it had (or will have) any real meaning until it has been extended to everyone on a fully equal basis...." DK
In the long transformation of the contagion of liberty, fallout from the Reformation, in 17th through 19th Century British politics, emancipation of this or that minority became expeditient, in a struggle between aristocratic factions and commons, neither of a majority of whom were either Catholic, or later, Jews. The Reform Acts, etc.
This to some extent is background.
Douglas went over in the First Debate the outline of background to creation of the secret abolitionist Republican party out of some Whigs and some Democrats.
Neither Whig nor Democrat majorities wanted a much stronger federal government.
Neither wanted to see much of a decline in the several states' individual rights and prerogatives.
Neither Whigs nor Democrats wanted to see the institution of slavery nationalized, or either mandated, or prohibited ab initio for new territories by federal fiat over existing states' rights, or territories existing or emerging wishes, even though there had been precedent for federal exclusion of slavery in territories, as distinct from states.
Only handfulls of abolitionists of either party objected to states' rights, and mainly only on the issue of slavery and trade.
Let's just put it this way: Other than for that, they mostly were, and would have remained, as good states' rights Whigs or Democrats as any other manjack wanton white grifters in Congress ever were.
Moving on to the issue of sectional strife, that had existed for a long time, but it had been mediated in a bi partisan way since there were some members of Congress from both sections.
Neither party majority, or its constituents, wanted or had voted for war to settle the slavery or any other issue.
They certainly did not think, and had certainly not been told, that they were in fact voting Republican in order to start, one way or another, immediately, an abolitionist war with seceding Southern states over the issue of slavery.
Furthermore, if they had been asked, a large majority of them, they also would have said that they believed that Southern states, or any states, had a right to secede from the USA if their people (the ones that counted) properly so chose.
There had been examples already in American history of a threat of secession by Northern states, and it was opposed but the balance of opinion probably favored the right to secede as well.
Turning to the Supreme Court, Justice Taney set out at length in Dred Scott the well established existing situation regarding the legal and constitutional position of negroes, a quite complex one, having to do even with counting and balancing inhabitants for Congressional representation, and characterized also in other contexts by racial inferiority and subordinate status in white society, none of which was the slightest bit reactionary or contentious for most all of those whites with some knowledge, regardless of the state they inhabited, except the few extreme abolitionists in either party.
The Court, no less than most congressmen of both parties, was merely towing a powerful states' rights theme struck in the Constitution, and as modified by existing legislation, and it had been mostly quite properly adhered to by the Court since 1787 in Dred Scott and before.
When scholars such as Foner join Lincoln's chorus dubbing Dred Scott an abominable decision, they expose either their ignorance, their guile, or both.
So, taken together, not only Congress, but also the Supreme Court, had generally viewed abolitionism with abhorrence, states' rights as the norm, and secession as legitimate.
It is only once the existing background of this separation of powers stage has been set, and it is seen that Lincoln's Republican secret society then upends by underhanded political manoeuvres the main positions, and so called checks and balances of all three branches of government at the same time, that the enormity of this electoral coup d'etat by fraud can finally be brought into high relief.
The conspiring Republicans could never have come to power legitimately by open admission of their actual agenda. They all knew that.
I want to return to Foner's account, not the nonsense high sounding parts about Lincoln gradually coming to abolitionism or toward radical republicanism, or the even more nonsense passages where Foner calls Lincoln on the racist carpet, of which there are plenty, but rather those passages, sometimes heartbreaking, sprinkled here and there throughout the book, some early experiences, see also late, p. 223, 224, (his full White House meeting with free negroes account is online, and posted elsewhere here) 225, 256, 257, where Lincoln's actual experiences and feelings, or lack of feelings, (I am not suggesting he need have actually had any) for negroes, early and late, in various contexts, shows through again and again, the pathos of these passages, of his superior and dismissive attitude toward those whom he publicly claimed should be treated as equals according to the Declaration, but denied it to the audiences who rejected it. Condemning Dred Scott but equivocating when convenient.
But in reality, behind even all of that dissembling rhetoric, he did not hesitate, as a very cold blooded politician, to use them mainly, one might almost say, exclusively, as his personal political pawns and later as cannon fodder, for his own political purposes, as one might use an old broken rake, a bent but usable shovel, or a dependable expendable farm animal.
Had some benevolent God of Negroes offered to pay the bill for them to all be returned, against their will, to Africa, free and slave, trust me, he would have jumped on it.
Lincoln's white only Immigration Act followed closely his negro Emancipation Proclamation, both during the Civil War.
So, in concluding, at least for the night, i have to say that DK's term hypocrisy hardly captures what Lincoln's secret society accomplished.
Rather, it was an actual Republican coup d' etat, a traitorous and fraudulent abuse of the electoral system, used to bring them, a radical fringe group, to power under totally false pretenses, so that they could then foment a civil war with the slave holding states and share the spoils among themselves under our spoils of office system. And that is exactly what they did, holding power from 1860 until 1932, 72 long years.
The secession of Deep South states, upon Lincoln's electoral victory, ironically, itself had the Republican party's desired effect, among many Northern racist but hardly abolitionist whites, of confirming his prior and extensive false claims that Southern whites intended to nationalize slavery not merely into new territories but into the Northern states themselves, so that the very Northern fears that Lincoln had previously fraudulently stoked to get elected now seemed to be being confirmed on the ground.
As we see even today, sometimes arguably routinely legitimate actions, so called non violent protests, sometimes government sanctioned, although now often interspersed with subversive elements both domestic and foreign, can play into the hands of radicals on the other side, espousing concepts of law and order and national unity not so very different from Lincoln's radical abolitionist program itself.
Think of the Democrats as a more diverse group of Douglas' moderates, but also now some radical and secessionist STOKELY ANTIFAS and BLM Black Power negroes espousing the original sin of the white West and white male America, confronting a stalwart unionist white Republican now in the White House.
In certain ways, Lincoln's coup was not so different from what Hitler had done to Weimar Germany, and was conducted by politicians in broad daylight only slightly less cynical or hypocritical.
This post is dedicated to DK's friend, Thomas Childers, whose Teaching Company lectures on Hitler I most enjoyed.
SMELL THE COFFEE GAME OVER
AS I HAD SAID LONG AGO...........
WHY NOT SAY IT WITH WEIWEI?
"The West should really have worried about China decades ago. Now it's already a bit too late, because the West has built its strong system in China and to simply cut it off, it will hurt deeply. That's why China is very arrogant."
This is one reason why Pillsbury's Confessions was an important summary, showing how far back the China delusion went, even though, as I had noted, itself following on the long Japanese delusion before it.
Monday, September 28, 2020
ASSROAST PHYSICS REALLY SET IN BIG IN CALIFORNIA
What matter, this or that reason?
Does it really matter whether the universe is really getting hotter, or just we are?
Think about it?
If it's just us, we're not really going to reverse it. Trust me.
If it's the universe, we're not going to reverse it. Trust me.
Take a shot.
Either way, it's getting hotter.
RE NIALL FERGUSON I HAD NOTED HOUSE ROTHSCHILD WASTE OF TIME VIRTUAL HISTORY VERY DIFFERENT STORY
Ferguson was editor, although he did write, or collaborate on, four sections.
HAZEL CHU DESERVES TO SIT WHERE SHE DOES
While I would have thought that there would be ethnic Irish politicians who might make more sense, given the complexity and violence of the long Irish, and British Isles, political and religious history, the Dublin Irish Council elected her themselves.
LEFT GLOBAL PAN AFRICA BLM BOMB ON NYT DONKEY
Nigeria's Boko Haram crisis: 'Bomb on donkey' used to ambush Borno governor.
THE POSTMODERN VOTE IS INDETERMINATE AND IN EYES OF BEHOLDERS
Solipsis, diversity drones, infest.
Nanos, white slates, negro holes, Big N Bang, fake sea level, Chad
BOKO Taxes, Twilight. Tonal time face space recognition gap.
NYT Paludon DONKEY.
Scratch Native Americans, Mongols bleed.
Sunday, September 27, 2020
ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN HAVE HAD IT
THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRES
One of the world's oldest conflicts, a territorial dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan, has re-erupted into fierce combat that killed at least 23 people.
They just need more American aid, Gates toilets, and shuttle diplomacy to get over it.
Terms search: Rupert Chapman
ANY CREATURE INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO IMPROVISE MAY TRY IT
Especially when it is a matter of life or death.
ONLY TWO IDEAS MOST DEMOCRATS CAN AGREE ON AND RUB TOGETHER: 1 STRAIGHT WHITE MALE + 2 BAD SMELL
Smell test, not skin color ID.
Most Democrats' one decision not necessarily visual.
Smell is all they need.
Smell test tabula rasa.
Newest fragrance: Straight White Male.
Buy it. Make a difference.
Saturday, September 26, 2020
FATAL ONLY NASALLY NOT CREDIBLE CDC BULLSHIT
The CDC says people cannot get infected by swallowing contaminated water, and it cannot be passed from person to person.
Those infected with Naegleria fowleri have symptoms including fever, nausea and vomiting, as well as a stiff neck and headaches. Most die within a week.
TIME FOR A BLM TAKEOVER OF COLOR IN FRANCE BABY! THE 1619 PROJECT FALLOUT
France racism: Paris to commemorate slave rebellion figure
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN PARTY SECRET SOCIETY IN BROAD DAYLIGHT ARENDT KOYRE BOBBITT FONER
This is a note following on the recent posts below.
I have cited Bobbitt in the past, who had noted that Lincoln's Union was what Bobbitt termed the first nation state of terror. The Shield of Achilles
Bobbitt, reviewing Civil War material, and in view of his remarks on the jurisprudential legitimacy of Dred Scott, Constitutional Fate, Constitutional Interpretation, appears also to have thought this was hardly as innocent or as benevolent a regime as it has since been painted by Whig interpretations, including Foner's.
Here is another important piece of the puzzle, brought out publicly in broad daylight, already by Douglas in the First Debate Opening Speech, the issue of how the secret agreement between Lincoln, the Whig and Democrat abolitionists, and Trumbull, had turned out, at first. It had turned out not as agreed.
The account, as told by Douglas, is on p 52 of Holzer and probably retold in later debates.
Why is this discussion important? Because it shows facts proving the existence of a secret abolitionist society of politicians of both parties, of a conspiracy among them, of a perceived or actual conspirators' double cross of Lincoln by Trumbull and others, and about the retribution Lincoln then later exacted for that double cross.
Trumbull, as Douglas describes, after the double cross, had then become Lincoln's thorough paced tool, traducing Douglas, to get Douglas' spot for Lincoln "in order to quiet Lincoln".
They had to pass a resolution that Lincoln was the first choice of the Republican party.
That was also why the Republican Convention were compelled to instruct for Lincoln and for nobody else, when they nominated him, according to Douglas.
See Zarefski, Lincoln Douglas and Slavery, p. 42. Zarefski seems to have had no clue why this was the case, called it confusing, and doesn't think to question what may have lain behind this fact situation.
(For the preponderance of northern white racism requiring a secret society abolitionism candidate, see Zarefski p. 19. Northerners did not want negroes free or slave, and voted for Lincoln thinking he would remove them, gradual extinction accompanied by removal was Lincoln's story. Frankly, it involved keeping them bottled up only in the South until removed. There was never, from the northern electorate perspective, any possibility of allowing free negroes in the north or in the territories. Removal is the word the electorate was thinking, not emancipate, or enfranchise. Lincoln's expressed view of Dred Scott was thus his most dangerous and exposed admission for his secret society plan, the one most likely to not get him elected. This was also why Douglas pounded Lincoln's Dred Scott view so very hard, in the very first speech, after exposing the secret society. Only an immediate abolitionist would object to
Dred Scott on the ground that it had denied the rights and privileges of citizenship to negroes, slave or free.)
As Douglas said, they had nobody else in the Republican Party, except Lincoln, for the reason that Lincoln demanded that they should now carry out "the arrangement".
Why therefore, did they, a political party convention, summarily bypass even from consideration, as Douglas even listed some of them, Archy Williams, Orville Browning, John Wentworth, Norman Judd, all fellow Republicans?
One word: Fear!
Maybe there was another word: Greed!
Why were they afraid?
For the same reason Douglas said Trumbull was then traducing against Douglas, to get Douglas' spot for Lincoln, because Trumbull and the fellow abolitionists had either failed or double crossed Lincoln already, and Trumbull was doing it "in order to quiet Lincoln".
What do you think "in order to quiet Lincoln" might have meant to Trumbull, and to Lincoln's fellow Republican party abolitionists?
I am telling you now, it meant one very big thing:
That if Trumbull and the Republican party secret society did not make amends, and seal the deal with Lincoln at its head now, he would not hesitate to now rat them all out, as being a secret society of radical abolitionists, not gradualists, not even actual colonizers, and he would let the chips fall where they might in the aftermath of his disclosures. See Arendt, Origins, The Totalitarian Movement.
Compare Trumbull's comments on Lincoln, his secretiveness, unwillingness to share any more information with anyone than he thought necessary at the time, cited in a webpage in a post below,
http://www.mrlincolnandfriends.org/members-of-congress/lyman-trumbull/
with Arendt, Origins, pb, p. 376, fn. 90, '.....Hitler to his General Staff 1939, "...a primer for a secret society."
Even great historians like J G Randall, whom I have cited many times here, and on whom Nevins admitted he had later relied heavily, failed to see that Lincoln was an abolitionist from the beginning and involved in a secret agreement with other abolitionists of both parties to form the Republican Party. Randall had thought Lincoln a moderate, a gradualist, had taken him at his word, so to speak.
Why was the new Republican Party secret society so interesting? Because it involved and combined abolitionist renegades from both the Whigs and Democrats!
It was the wholesale party betrayal of both the majorities of elected politicians of each party, and of the great majority of the constituents of each major party, by the immediate abolitionist rogues joining the Republican secret society party.
As Douglas put it, Holzer p. 52, "...having formed this new party for the joint benefit of deserters from Whiggery and deserters from Democracy---..."
Why did these scalawags and carpetbagger traitors to their parties and people do it?
It ended up being by far the biggest political and financial bonanza for these politicians and their party this nation ever saw or ever will.
They won the Civil War, reaped the proceeds in all directions, didn't pay the bills, and kept themselves, their successors, assigns, puppets, and their cronies in power from 1860 all the way until 1932, (ignoring Wilson as a Democrat), 72 long sad years. Lincoln's Immigration Act, the most ambitious in American history was not for the South. it was not really designed to replace negroes, who weren't now going anywhere. The Immigration Act was for importing foreign whites for the North and the West.
For the South, it was Lincoln's Morgenthau Plan, keep control for a time, keep freed negroes voting Republican, and let white southerners do something about negroes if they could. It was not the job of the federal government, after the Reconstruction Northern occupation. Not its job to repatriate them, not its job to assure them any source of livelihood. Not its job. Only to make sure that southern whites did not reinstitute negro slavery, or try to export negroes either north or west. That was when the fat really finally hit the fire.
The Republicans' colonization plan for negroes turned out to have actually meant this: the South was to now become an isolated colony of Africa, cut off from the rest of America. And that is largely what it remained for a long time.
Even when a left Democrat finally took over, (ignoring Wilson as a Democrat), in 1932, after 72 years, he did almost nothing to change that whatsoever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)