Small wonder that Akhmerov, in a lecture in Moscow in the early 1960s, identified Hopkins by name as "the most important of all Soviet wartime agents in the United States."
BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Sunday, October 28, 2018
ONE MORAL OF DK'S LAST POST MATTEOTTI CIANFARRA
It just doesn't pay to be either a utopian globalist socialist activist, or an unsavory Italian journalist, Cianfarra.
George Seldes, the actual Chicago Tribune corrrespondent expelled from Italy, had been influenced by Cianfarra.
David F Schmitz, Between the Scylla of Reaction and the Charybdis of Bolshevism: Woodrow Wilson and Italy The United States And Fascist Italy, 1922-1940, fn 61.
it appears from the above that Seldes, the Chicago Tribune columnist, may have ratted out his seedy source, before being expelled from Italy, at the demand of his own government.
it appears from the above that Seldes, the Chicago Tribune columnist, may have ratted out his seedy source, before being expelled from Italy, at the demand of his own government.
Saturday, October 27, 2018
AGAINST ECONOMIC NATIONALISM MR MORE FREE TRADE BROOKS
"You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE). America is diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE); if you don’t love diversity (FREE GLOBAL TRADE), you are not an American nationalist." DB
DIALOGUE TWO WHITEFACE HITLERS MEET AT A HALLOWEEN BALL
I believe in nationalism and diversity.
So do I.
Two blackface Stalins meet at the same ball:
I believe in communism and diversity.
So do I.
And so on.....one blackface one whiteface.....
And so on,...one Chinaface one Japanface( both negroes under the skin)
I believe in nationalism and communism and diversity.
So do I.
Meghan Kelly at Halloween ball, in blackface:
I believe in Facebook.
So do I.
Two blackface Stalins meet at the same ball:
I believe in communism and diversity.
So do I.
And so on.....one blackface one whiteface.....
And so on,...one Chinaface one Japanface( both negroes under the skin)
I believe in nationalism and communism and diversity.
So do I.
Meghan Kelly at Halloween ball, in blackface:
I believe in Facebook.
W: THESE PRINCIPLES ARE RIGHT FOR ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE!
American nationalism has been one of the great joys, comforts and motivators of my life. I don’t know how anybody can live without it. DB
I don’t know how anybody can live without it............................
He means, trust me, anybody, anywhere.
I don’t know how anybody can live without it............................
He means, trust me, anybody, anywhere.
THE SPIRIT OF AMERICAN NATIONALISM IS IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE
If you look at the Milner Group and their creed, especially the later ones, eg Lionel Curtis, it is the same.
The British Empire would have to die to be reborn as The World.
The British Empire would have to die to be reborn as The World.
HE IS INTENTIONALLY CONFUSING NATIONALISM WITH GLOBALISM HERE
You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity. America is diversity; if you don’t love diversity, you are not an American nationalist.
LINCOLN THE ANTI NATIONALIST
"...You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another — class against class, race against race, tribe against tribe...." DB
You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another,... section against section.
Boomerbuster
The anti zero-sum society Brooks describes is a society without borders, the one whose citizens become traitors to their nation state by joining.
This post is dedicated to Lester Thurow, another great globalist economist.
You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another,... section against section.
Boomerbuster
The anti zero-sum society Brooks describes is a society without borders, the one whose citizens become traitors to their nation state by joining.
This post is dedicated to Lester Thurow, another great globalist economist.
BROOKS' FAUX NATIONALISM IS THREATENED BY INDIVIDUALISM AND GLOBALISM
As well as by faux nationalists, which is how he characterizes Trump. (I already pointed out that Lincoln was also a faux nationalist....)
The greatest threats, he says, come from those who also, (paradoxically, illogically,) claim to be nationalists, but are not (He means fascists.)
David Brooks, of what you accuse Trump, right or wrong, you yourself are, in spades, a relentless globalist, masquerading, in the pages of the NYT, as a new kind, a kinder gentler, kind, of nationalist.
The greatest threats, he says, come from those who also, (paradoxically, illogically,) claim to be nationalists, but are not (He means fascists.)
David Brooks, of what you accuse Trump, right or wrong, you yourself are, in spades, a relentless globalist, masquerading, in the pages of the NYT, as a new kind, a kinder gentler, kind, of nationalist.
Friday, October 26, 2018
IS CLASSICAL LIBERALISM CONSERVATIVE? YORAM HAZONY
The Brooks story book.
What is 'classical liberalism'?
LET'S JUST SAY WHAT BROOKS' NATIONALISM IS: YORAM HAZONY NATIONALISM
Not lower Manhattan localism, masquerading as nationalism.
Yoram Hazony nationalism......Trust me.
He says as much in his article....read it.
Yoram Hazony, New York: Basic Books, The Virtue of Nationalism, 2018
The nod to Renan, the Christian stooge apologist, and then Hazony, the real Orthodox Jewish power behind Brooks' NYT Christian Renanian stooges.
Yoram Hazony nationalism......Trust me.
He says as much in his article....read it.
Yoram Hazony, New York: Basic Books, The Virtue of Nationalism, 2018
The nod to Renan, the Christian stooge apologist, and then Hazony, the real Orthodox Jewish power behind Brooks' NYT Christian Renanian stooges.
BROOKS' NOT JUST BUT IT IS SIMON SAYS NATIONALISM
"What does this national attachment feel like? It feels a bit like any other kind of love — a romantic love, or a love between friends. It is not one thing that you love but the confluence of a hundred things. Yes, it is the beauty of the Rockies, but it is not just the land. It is the Declaration of Independence, but not just the creed. It’s winning World War II and Silicon Valley, but it is not just the accomplishments. It is the craziness, the diversity, our particular brand of madness."
What would Simon Brooks Says say American nationalism is not?
He doesn't say........................................................................
Since, as Brooks admits, almost no Americans are actually nationalists (5%), this must include a hell of a lot........................
What would Simon Brooks Says say American nationalism is not?
He doesn't say........................................................................
Since, as Brooks admits, almost no Americans are actually nationalists (5%), this must include a hell of a lot........................
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
RE THE DEFINING PARTNERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY MISE EN SCENE WEST SIDE STORY G20
We show an elegant ballroom.
The President and Premier Singh are dancing the tango together, both in suits.
However, the President is the male partner for this particularly dramatic moment in the dance.
There are one or two other identifiable pairs on the dance floor, looking on, with various expressions of emotion.
There are about G20 individuals on the side lines.These should be arrayed in groups or cliques based on ethnic, national, or racial characteristics. Think West Side Story.
Certain groups can be snapping their fingers, facing one direction, etc., in unison........
They eye each other with suspicion, etc., etc.
The caption above
EAST SIDE STORY
The caption below
The Defining Partnership For The 21st Century.
LINCOLN WAS THE GREAT AMERICAN SECTIONALIST MASQUERADING AS A NATIONALIST
So, Brooks has Lincoln all wrong, re Brooks' nationalism.
The Republicans were the sectionalist party, not at all a nationalist party, not the Democrats, and Douglas, who were the actual nationalist party.
If Brooks says Trump is a sectionalist, then I say his classic, quintessential predecessor is Lincoln, Brooks' own so called nationalist hero.
Go figure.
The Republicans were the sectionalist party, not at all a nationalist party, not the Democrats, and Douglas, who were the actual nationalist party.
If Brooks says Trump is a sectionalist, then I say his classic, quintessential predecessor is Lincoln, Brooks' own so called nationalist hero.
Go figure.
BROOKS SAYS HE IS A NATIONALIST SO DID LINCOLN
"Donald Trump says he is a nationalist, but you can’t be a nationalist if you despise half the nation — any more than you can be a good father if you despise half your children. You can’t be a nationalist if you think that groups in the nation are in a zero-sum conflict with one another — class against class, race against race, tribe against tribe.
"You can’t be a nationalist if you despise diversity. America is diversity; if you don’t love diversity, you are not an American nationalist." DB
Back at the time of the Civil War "diversity" meant South and North.
Lincoln didn't like diversity.
"A house divide cannot stand." He and his party despised half the nation, as Brooks says.
DOUTHAT VOTE REPUBLICAN SENATE BUT LOCAL DEMOCRATS
Think global act local.
Think local act global.
Think Republican global.
Think Democrat local.
Think local act global.
Think Republican global.
Think Democrat local.
LEOPARD IN JUNGLE SEEMS TO CHANGE HIS SPOTS DAVID BROOKS AMERICAN NATIONALIST
You never heard him say anything like this in 30 years, or did you?
If he did, he was lying back then.
Is he lying now?
You decide.
He cites Ernest Renan. Take a look at Renan, Wikipedia.
Rather hard to believe that Brooks would make such a reference knowingly regarding Renan as an ideal for his (Brooks') nationalism.
Here's a tip: Brooks'American nationalism is Brooks' American globalism.
he confesses he has made an exzzxtensive study of how americans feel. What does it show?
There is virtually no national feeling here whatsoever.
The vast majority of Americans apparently identify with their local area.
He doesn't tell you how many identify with humanity in general (maybe his code word for his globalism), but given that the vast majority of Americans, as he himself admits, identify locally, not even nationalistically, the whole situation is pretty goddamned pathetic any way nyou think you mwant to turn it.
So Brooks, even if he were a nationalist, would be a fish out of water in localist populist America.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser can regale us with his views on this most treacherous of topics....
If he did, he was lying back then.
Is he lying now?
You decide.
He cites Ernest Renan. Take a look at Renan, Wikipedia.
Rather hard to believe that Brooks would make such a reference knowingly regarding Renan as an ideal for his (Brooks') nationalism.
Here's a tip: Brooks'American nationalism is Brooks' American globalism.
he confesses he has made an exzzxtensive study of how americans feel. What does it show?
There is virtually no national feeling here whatsoever.
The vast majority of Americans apparently identify with their local area.
He doesn't tell you how many identify with humanity in general (maybe his code word for his globalism), but given that the vast majority of Americans, as he himself admits, identify locally, not even nationalistically, the whole situation is pretty goddamned pathetic any way nyou think you mwant to turn it.
So Brooks, even if he were a nationalist, would be a fish out of water in localist populist America.
Perhaps Professor Kaiser can regale us with his views on this most treacherous of topics....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)