audience today at the moment

Entry	Pageviews
United States	10
United Kingdom	4
Canada	2
China	2
France	1

RE BBC FAUX VACCINE SPY PROGRAMS USED TO APPREHEND BIN LADIN UNDER COUNTERATTACKS

I recommend ending vaccine programs, because we already have too large a global population, anyway. 

Not for cloak and dagger reasons, nor really for the safety of the vaccination workers.

RE NYT ARTICLE NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF HUMAN CONFLICT CALL IN JARON LANIER

“But it is a legal and diplomatic gamble whether this approach is more likely to halt attacks that a classified American report circulated last year said were directed at more than 3,000 American companies.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said that while nations routinely spy on one another for national security purposes, it was out of bounds for China to use state espionage operations to gain commercial advantages.

At the core of the indictment is the argument that while large countries routinely spy on each other for national security purposes, it is out of bounds to use state-run intelligence assets to seek commercial advantage.”

It is decades too late to bemoan the consequences of lazy market capitalist globalization, and its casual dispersion of technologies and know how, its institutional disregard for intellectual property, privacy rights, and above all, the common welfare here.  

After all, our companies and those of others, have been building plants and shared research facilities in China, and elsewhere, for decades now, not merely sharing technology voluntarily, often for peanuts. 

Regarding so called espionage, private companies have been brought into conspiracy with governments, ours and others, to spy on their and others' populations, companies, and governments, at will.

They, the Chinese, must wonder at our long standing stupidity, to have largely fostered such a give away globalist technology system.

Short term profit, appeasement, strategic alliances, and pacifist liberalism, are not adequate explanations for such a level of stupidity.

Never in the history of human conflict has so much been given or bargained away to so many by so few for so little so quickly.

re multidisciplinary studies and Wittgenstein

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/07/later-wittgenstein-search-paradox-and.html

The rest, unless for clinical or other, practical or professional, reasons or needs, is, structurally, twaddle.

To quote Wittgenstein, somewhat out of his context, disciplinization itself, and especially further subdisciplinary fragmentations, are the ' conjuror's trick ' of higher education. 

Wittgenstein, P. I., para. 308.

NEGATIVE SUM GAME

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2013/07/re-yueh-bbc-us-versus-china-short.html

NUF SAID

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2013/08/ps.html

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2013/08/re-prior-post-ps-re-1917-1945.html

RE PIKETTY A NICE SHORT SQUIB ON A COUPLE ISSUES

http://fixingtheeconomists.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/why-thomas-piketty-is-wrong-about-inflation-and-interest-rates/

re UN UKRAINE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2014/05/i-am-just-going-to-put-it-this-way.html

They are everywhere you want to be.

Naked Capitalism

COPY OF RECENT INQUIRY RE FDR

(To Professor Laud)

Professor:

I enjoyed reading your article. http://www.fdrheritage.org/fdr&holocaust.htm

I have been trying to ascertain whether Roosevelt himself, regarding his Dutch parentage and religious heritage, may have had reasons, analogous, in some ways, to those of Hull, whose wife was Jewish, not to press too heavily on Jewish matters, beyond a certain point.

I read Beschloss' book, and wondered if this might account for the anti Germanism Beschloss ascribes to Roosevelt in The Conquerors.

Very truly yours,

INVESTING IN THE TARGET IS AFTER ALL MERELY AN ELABORATE SMOKE SCREEN

RE Yves Smith.

Even the tariff scare of the 70s and 80s, when they built plants here and there, and later, was mainly a purely politically motivated feint, as they already knew, basically, both the Germans and the Japanese and others, that no real developmental protection (the only kind worth keeping in place), or any corresponding large scale renewed industrial or technological innovation, would, or could, emerge here, anyway.

Reading Lester Thurow, The Zero Sum Society, 1980, he pointed out, that we had protection, but not innovation.

In truth, we had largely faux protection, sans developmental or redevelopmental innovation, in certain limited areas, for a limited period, quickly swept away shortly thereafter.

IT IS LESS IMPORTANT MAKING WISE INVESTMENTS IN, THAN FIRST HAVING WELL HOLLOWED OUT, THE TARGET

Re Yves Smith. 

Naked Capitalism site. 

Wall of shame, really.

Yves Smith facilitator for naked capitalism think Trading Places You Only Live Twice Japan then China

"...Readers may recall I worked with the Japanese when they were in the same position the Chinese are in now, that of exporting massive amounts of capital, and at the juncture when private businessmen were eagerly hoovering up foreign investments. In some ways, the Japanese then were better positioned than the Chinese are now due to the strength of the yen in the later 1980s (the result of the Plaza Accord of 1985 which sought to and succeeded in lowering the dollar relative to the yen). Before then, I did some advisory work for a cross-border M&A effort of a McKinsey client, and have been recruited by boutiques that were focused on cross-border investing."

OCCASIONALLY A CERTAIN KNOWN INDIVIDUAL GETS ON THIS SITE AND VENTS

such as two posts ago.

Ignore these.

I'M WITH THE RUSSIANS ON THE WURST

The convergence of news and entertainment market capitalist media, and their relative invincibility among Western liberal democracies....

http://bozonbloggon.blogspot.com/2010/08/mise-en-scene-for-cartoon-t-back-hot.html

He is rather a later, degenerate, version, of say, Charles Aznavour, as a transvestite.

One question, given the apparent Francophilia here, is why the Austrians themselves, or even more so, the Germans, have not shouted out, culturally, ' foul '! 

One answer is set out above, and below:

'The convergence of news and entertainment market capitalist media, and their relative invincibility among Western liberal democracies....'

To whom it may concern,

I am, pretty much the entire time, a complete idiot. I leave my blog open so that others can write posts on it. I leave the CAPS on so that everyone else using this computer will get all messed up. Others that have used the computer after me have tried logging into their own accounts and get all screwed up because CAPS is on. Then they keep trying to submit their passwords and such and it doesn't work. Then they're logged out for hours, or perhaps days, and it's all because of my negligence. Long story short, I need to stop blogging all the time, go do some actual work, and stop wasting time writing stupid posts and screwing other people up. 

RE PIKETTY KEYNES THUROW ETC

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/05/philip-pilkington-pikettys-regressive-views-public-debt-potential-impact-book.html

ENORMOUS BLUNDER YOU WON'T SEE ANY ECONOMISTS TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS TO YOU

"Shared antagonism to Soviet Union crucial to Sino-American rapprochment.... 72."

Read, say, Kennan, Russia and the West Under Lenin and Stalin, "Russia and the War in Asia".

I AM JUST GOING TO PUT IT THIS WAY RADICAL WHIG DISNEYWORLD IT'S A SMALL WORLD DREAMLAND

American anarchic (think 17th,  18th, century radical Whig theory) early globalist market capitalism (Smuggler Nation), whether left or  right, later, engenders political weakness, and disorder, everywhere else, (think globalized Sovereignty at Bay), 

leading to foreign political disorder across and between both nations and their civilizations, which in turn requires intervention against (radical Whig individualist) human rights violations, 

caused by the very anarchic capitalist globalist ' system ' we have, from the beginning really, espoused.

Sovereignty at Bay: "...When in Rome, do as the Romans."

"Apocalypse Now": "... Sir, I see no method."

Theme music: "It's A Small World After All" 

BECKETTIAN REVISITING THUROW

With everyone emoting over Piketty, why not.

Though I am not an authority on something like this, he was our last popular, 'so called', political economist, was he not?

Maybe there were others, whose names have slipped my mind. 

"Well then, if they have slipped your mind, then how popular could they have been?" 

See the circularity, or should one not call it, rather, decline, or perhaps not, both?

past blast passage

"For Americans, politics, history, and morals, have overwhelmingly been somebody's else's 'business'..."