| Entry | Pageviews | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 5, 2019
|
2
| |||||||||
Oct 5, 2019
|
1
| |||||||||
1
| ||||||||||
Oct 5, 2019
|
1
| |||||||||
1
| ||||||||||
Oct 5, 2019
|
1
| |||||||||
Oct 5, 2019
|
1
| |||||||||
Oct 5, 2019
|
1
| |||||||||
1
| ||||||||||
1
|
BOOMERBUSTER
OLD CELLO
Sunday, October 6, 2019
GEORGE WASHINGTON DONALD TRUMP THE FRONTIER AND EASTERN EUROPE
Trump's real analog.
Both had large, personal, interests at stake.
See, Slaughter, The Whiskey Rebellion, Conclusion.
Both had large, personal, interests at stake.
See, Slaughter, The Whiskey Rebellion, Conclusion.
AFTER THE AMERICAN REBELLION WHIG AMERICANS THINK ALL WAS HUNKY DORY HERE
Until the Civil War.
That is the Whig story that is told.
See The Language of Liberty, Ch 3, Section IV;
Slaughter, The Whiskey Rebellion, Bloch, Visionary Republic; Leland Baldwin, Whiskey Rebels; Marini, Radical Sects, etc.
That is the Whig story that is told.
See The Language of Liberty, Ch 3, Section IV;
Slaughter, The Whiskey Rebellion, Bloch, Visionary Republic; Leland Baldwin, Whiskey Rebels; Marini, Radical Sects, etc.
THE MENU POSTMODERNISM IS DAVID REICH DNA MIXTURE CULTURAL FUSION ONLY
ONLY SERVED IN BOWLS: PROTEINS POULTRY AND LAMB BUT INCREASINGLY VEGETARIAN, OFTEN NO PORK, OR EVEN BEEF, STARCHES, VEGGIES, SOUPS, FRUITS, NUTS I AM ALLERGIC TO BOTH SOY AND PEANUTS, OILS USED EXTENSIVELY IN FUSION BOWLS, SOY SAUCE DITTOHEAD.
Even Kosher is out, for Reich.
Even Kosher is out, for Reich.
POSTMODERNISM CHARACTERISTICS IN PRIOR POST
Thursday, January 18, 2018
RE DK IMPERIALISM POST COMMENT
"Meanwhile, a different kind of imperialism was emerging among western governments in North America and in Eastern Europe. Essentially, it seems to me, it is attempting to take advantage of the global economic order to impose certain western political and cultural values on other parts of the world." DK
This is, in general terms, fall out from the Age of the Democratic Revolution. Enlightenment turns into universalist Jacobinism in due course.
Technically, its ideals are mostly not inherently Western ones in its own mind, and in its political history, but rather embrace the so called brotherhood of man, a universal anti Western ideal.
Britain was already tending in this direction in the 18th Century, being only half Western according to Schroeder, just as Russia was, too.
It believes in no particular religion, no particular Western or Middle Eastern religions, nor in any establishment of religion anywhere.
It believes in no racialism, traditionally associated with traditional civilizations: it is anti any color whatever, white, black, yellow, red, brown, purple.
It rejects so called Western cultural values to the extent that they conflict with universal ones. (Universal values really means no values, however.)
NOW A WHISTLEBLOWER RAT CAN BE A HEARSAY RAT
And later be exonerated by revelation that the original source was incorrect.
It opens the door wider to the media being whistleblowers based on insider tips, right or wrong, which is not how the whistleblower concept had developed.
Giving journalists Ridenour awards only adds to the confusion.
Journalists should never be allowed to be whistleblow except on their own news organization, and then only on first hand information from within it.
Now a second hand whistleblower can pay for or extort information that it then discloses.
It is called corruption.
It opens the door wider to the media being whistleblowers based on insider tips, right or wrong, which is not how the whistleblower concept had developed.
Giving journalists Ridenour awards only adds to the confusion.
Journalists should never be allowed to be whistleblow except on their own news organization, and then only on first hand information from within it.
Now a second hand whistleblower can pay for or extort information that it then discloses.
It is called corruption.
Saturday, October 5, 2019
WHAT IS THE HINDU WHO QUALIFIES FOR A FREE GATES $350 TOILET GOING TO DO?
This is a mini lecture on Hindu and American income convergence.
He makes only $300 a year. He needs money, not Bill Gates' toilet.
He sells it for $100 to another Hindu who makes $1500 or less a year. That Hindu can barely afford it either.
That Hindu sells it for $200 to a Hindu who makes $3500 a year.
That Hindu either keeps it, or sells it for $250 to a Hindu who makes $5,000 a year.
And so on.
Finally, the Gates toilet is bought by an American for $500, because, like a Tesla, it is now a status symbol in the West, even though he can afford a $1,500 toilet.
Bill Gates toilets and Teslas are bad jokes on environmentalism.
Dumbass millionaire liberal dialogue:
"Have you heard the great news about Tesla recharge stations?"
"No, what?"
"They are installing subsidized Bill Gates toilets at Tesla recharge stations!"
"That's fantastic!"
He makes only $300 a year. He needs money, not Bill Gates' toilet.
He sells it for $100 to another Hindu who makes $1500 or less a year. That Hindu can barely afford it either.
That Hindu sells it for $200 to a Hindu who makes $3500 a year.
That Hindu either keeps it, or sells it for $250 to a Hindu who makes $5,000 a year.
And so on.
Finally, the Gates toilet is bought by an American for $500, because, like a Tesla, it is now a status symbol in the West, even though he can afford a $1,500 toilet.
Bill Gates toilets and Teslas are bad jokes on environmentalism.
Dumbass millionaire liberal dialogue:
"Have you heard the great news about Tesla recharge stations?"
"No, what?"
"They are installing subsidized Bill Gates toilets at Tesla recharge stations!"
"That's fantastic!"
GATES ON ECONOMISTS
Bill Gates takes a dim view of economists’ ability to know what’s going on in the economy.
“Too bad economists don’t actually understand macroeconomics,” the Microsoft co-founder noted during a recent interview with Quartz. Asked what he meant by that, Gates continued:
“It’s not like physics where you take certain inputs and you predict certain outputs. Will interest rates ever return to normal, and why aren’t they returning to normal? You won’t get a consensus between economists quite the way that if youdropped a ball out your window and called up physicists and asked, ‘What the hell happened?’ There’s so many factors including what [economist John Maynard] Keynes called ‘animal spirits’ in the economic equation that we don’t have predictability. Even today, people are still arguing about what happened in 2008. So it’s even harder to look forward. [Look at] the role of the bond rating agencies in 2008, which is completely unreformed. Why would that be? Well, there must be a lack of consensus.”
Gates is right, in a way: Economists don’t understand much about the macroeconomy. No one does. Any responsible economist is the first to admit that.
As opposed to microeconomics, which looks at the economy at the level of individual businesses and consumers, macroeconomics aims to explain the interaction of different factors that affect the economy as a whole, such as how interest rates impact macro variables like unemployment, inflation, and economic growth.
As Gates points out, the economy is complex and ever changing. Economists try to make sense of it by developing mathematical models that describe how the different factors relate to each other, and test the accuracy of those models using past data. But the macroeconomy has millions of moving parts that affect each other. Knowing what to include or exclude, and if the economy has changed from when data were collected, is never straightforward—which is why economists tend to disagree on almost everything.
Economic models are always incomplete, but it’s hard to argue that we’d be better off without them. Economists’ research has contributed to fewer people living in poverty, low predictable inflation, and less risk and uncertainty. Macroeconomic models offer a logical, consistent framework to help policymakers understand how people and different factors may respond to a new tax, benefit, or regulation.
Gates’s critique of economists follows several decades of rapid expansion in the field’s influence on policymaking and popular culture. His comment came during the interview as he discussed concerns about a global recession:
“The idea of negative 10-year rates, or now in Germany’s case, negative 30-year rates, this is macroeconomically uncharted territory. As Warren Buffett says, go through any economics textbook and find a reference to negative interest rates—you won’t find it. And yet, almost half the government debt in the world today, if you take out US debt, the majority of government debt bears negative interest rates. And there are certain reasons why that should not be the case, but it is the case. There’s always the risk of an economic recession, and trade wars increase that risk, and the [recent] macroeconomic figures increase that risk quite a bit. But I’m not in control of that. I get to pick which HIV scientists to fund and I get to pitch which malaria drugs to go after, or new ways of killing mosquitos. I don’t have some global economic levers up here in my foundation office.”
DEFECATING IN THE OPEN HAS MANY ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES
OVER MORE SO CALLED MORE CIVILIZED ALTERNATIVES.
THE MORE CIVILIZED ALTERNATIVES ARE IN ANY CASE OUT OF REACH, PROBABLY FOREVER, FOR BILLIONS OF PEOPLE, AND EVEN MORE MILLIONS EVERY DAY.
CONGREGATE AREAS FOR OPEN DEFECATION SEEM TO BE THE BIG BLUNDER. A PILE HERE AND A PILE THERE IS THE WAY TO GO.
A nice compost pile here and there, worms grow naturally without $350 spent.
Bill Gates $350 worm toilets seem cheap to us. I would get one, but the city code prohibits it.
Why pay $350 for worms? Don't they just grow naturally in manure? There must be a catch.
Now think about it for a minute.
$350.
Do you know how much the average Indian makes in a year?
Maybe less than $350!
But Gates thinks he is doing the Hindus and Africans a favor!
if it is feasible, and they are given one free, they will either sell it, or these poor devils will convert it to a cooking pot or a barbecue grill!
But, I have to give it to Gates: Trump could not think of something like this!
In Freudian terms, is he feces fixated, or anal retentive? It's one or the other, or both.
Terms search: grateful
THE MORE CIVILIZED ALTERNATIVES ARE IN ANY CASE OUT OF REACH, PROBABLY FOREVER, FOR BILLIONS OF PEOPLE, AND EVEN MORE MILLIONS EVERY DAY.
CONGREGATE AREAS FOR OPEN DEFECATION SEEM TO BE THE BIG BLUNDER. A PILE HERE AND A PILE THERE IS THE WAY TO GO.
A nice compost pile here and there, worms grow naturally without $350 spent.
Bill Gates $350 worm toilets seem cheap to us. I would get one, but the city code prohibits it.
Why pay $350 for worms? Don't they just grow naturally in manure? There must be a catch.
Now think about it for a minute.
$350.
Do you know how much the average Indian makes in a year?
Maybe less than $350!
But Gates thinks he is doing the Hindus and Africans a favor!
if it is feasible, and they are given one free, they will either sell it, or these poor devils will convert it to a cooking pot or a barbecue grill!
But, I have to give it to Gates: Trump could not think of something like this!
In Freudian terms, is he feces fixated, or anal retentive? It's one or the other, or both.
Terms search: grateful
RT VIDEO SEE 1:15 MINUTES INTO THE BROADCAST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCF9My1vBP4
Is it bribery, extortion, exaction, ultra vires, espionage, fascism, or just market capitalism?
Is it bribery, extortion, exaction, ultra vires, espionage, fascism, or just market capitalism?
AUDIENCE TODAY
| Entry | Pageviews |
|---|---|
France
|
68
|
United States
|
27
|
Russia
|
26
|
Ukraine
|
16
|
South Korea
|
15
|
Germany
|
2
|
Estonia
|
1
|
Italy
|
1
|
CHINA NOW ASKS RUSSIA ITS ALLY TO INVESTIGATE BIDENS IN UKRAINE ACTING FOR US AGAINST RUSSIA
Trump has asked China to investigate Bidens.
How could Putin, in all good conscience, refuse China's request?
How could Putin, in all good conscience, refuse China's request?
DREW PEARSON HAD TWO AT LEAST CPUSA MEMBERS AND SOVIET AGENTS AS RIGHT HAND MEN
Not just Karr, but also Older. Stalin's Secret Agents, see generally Ch 11. Pearson's partner, Anderson, himself, pointed some of this out. See VENONA.
TLF GUY ON A BUFFALO
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
CASH STRAPPED RAILROADED STATES BITE BACK GO ECONOMIC ON THEIR BUFFALOS
State governments are each rather like guys on buffalos.
MNCs are buffalos.
Buffalos stomp and gore to death hundreds of local governments, just for fun.
So, it's not a ride for everyone.
Question: How did states go full authoritarian on their elected democratic governors?
Answer: The buffalos had already gone full economic on their legislatures and locals.
Leonhardt/Liberace: Cry baby yesterday about Walgreens.......What a pussy!
Walgreens is a fucking buffalo.
Liberace, honest to god, is Vox bait!
ASK PUTIN TO SCRUTINIZE THE BIDENS
This is now not so far fetched. The Bidens were acting in Ukraine against the Russians.
Further, having invited China, why not ask Russia, China's ally?
Further, having invited China, why not ask Russia, China's ally?
Friday, October 4, 2019
MY FATHER'S EMPLOYER AND MENTOR FOR SOME TIME
Jack Eckerd became a hero in the Christian press in the mid-1980s when he ordered Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler magazines and other 'questionable books' off the shelves of Eckerd Drugs stores, calling them 'America's family drugstores.' According to the Christian Herald, Eckerd also led a drive, through lobbying and public pressure, to convince other drugstore chains to 'stop selling pornography.'
CHIMPS HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS WHAT MATTER DAVID REICH'S MODERN HUMAN DEFINITION?
If you ask David Reich, he would say chimps and orangutans are not modern humans.
They now have human rights.
What does what David Reich thinks matter, really?
They now have human rights.
What does what David Reich thinks matter, really?
Monday, March 11, 2019
LIBERACE TAR BABY NYT SMALL SNIFF WHAT I HAVE LONG PROCLAIMED
Liberace, David Leonhardt, bless his heart, has long tended to believe in economists, especially his own there at NYT.
Now he is calling them out, including his own, making him also a NYT Economist Tar Baby!
'For a decade now, same mistake, again and again and again...... '
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman, who characteristically on anything like this, is likely to lie low and wait for it to pass.
No! He weighed in..... Secular Stagnation Is
Now he is calling them out, including his own, making him also a NYT Economist Tar Baby!
'For a decade now, same mistake, again and again and again...... '
This post is dedicated to Paul Krugman, who characteristically on anything like this, is likely to lie low and wait for it to pass.
No! He weighed in..... Secular Stagnation Is
Even Less Reason To Worry
He is trying to technocratically smother (in its crib) w jargon any larger implications anyone might lurch their way toward understanding re the debate between Stiglitz and Summers, or even re Stiglitz and Summers aside!
Terms search: economist fatal tar baby Rodrik
You're living in a Stag Nation
He is trying to technocratically smother (in its crib) w jargon any larger implications anyone might lurch their way toward understanding re the debate between Stiglitz and Summers, or even re Stiglitz and Summers aside!
Terms search: economist fatal tar baby Rodrik
You're living in a Stag Nation
THREE TOP POSTS TODAY AS RYSSDAL SAYS BY THE NUMBERS
| Entry | Pageviews | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40
| ||||||||||
Feb 23, 2018
|
39
| |||||||||
Feb 2, 2018
|
26
|
AUDIENCE RIGHT NOW BUYING AT THE BOTTOM
EntryPageviews
Jefferson bought Louisiana at the bottom.
Russia
16
United States
1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)