If have a Council of Psychological Advisors, why not go for the gold?
(Addendum: Of course, one would not select a group from the contributors to, say, The Stone! Eg: "What Snow Flakes Get Right about Free Speech")
(Addendum: Of course, one would not select a group from the contributors to, say, The Stone! Eg: "What Snow Flakes Get Right about Free Speech")
Say, what about a Council of Historical Advisors?
Why not have dueling Councils, with a meta council officiating?
That might actually move, some day, in the distant future, toward a way to do public and strategic policy in a useful way, for a change, rather than the nonsense going on now on campuses, pitting blind left and right radical thugs against all fragmented and warring academic and political authority.
Why abandon to, say, a serving for life Supreme Court, or a newly elected President and his meagerly informed new Cabinet, (never mind Congress, and the 50 governments of the several states) de facto authority over decisions of that scope and complexity, as we do under our present system?
Why abandon to, say, a serving for life Supreme Court, or a newly elected President and his meagerly informed new Cabinet, (never mind Congress, and the 50 governments of the several states) de facto authority over decisions of that scope and complexity, as we do under our present system?
No comments:
Post a Comment