It's hard to improve on Ayn Rand,
for simplicity and paucity of fundamental logical principles:
A is A. (A is for Ayn, or anything.)
A is not non-A.
One is tempted to call her an Aristotelian (informal logic),
or perhaps post-Aristotelian; but, not-Aristotelian, really.
I don't know, really, what to call her 'field'.
She was not an economist, not a philosopher, not a novelist, really, not a sociologist, not a politician as such; not really anything, 'not-A', really.
No comments:
Post a Comment