"Wednesday, October 4, 2017
POLITICS LAW AND PHILOSOPHY SUBSTANCE PROCEDURE SEPARATION OF POWERS FOIBLES"
Certainly, if this is how the constitution is to be interpreted, along substantive versus procedural lines, then many diverse implications then follow....
One of the ways this has happened is through the interpretation of certain bureaucratic, aristocratic, religious, and military decisionmaking formalities and rules, as having long been analogous to what has come to be thought of, constitutionally, and reductionalistically, as inherently procedural matters.
Modern administrative procedures, of various kinds, is a classic example.
The diversity of procedures judicial in nature, is based in part on civil law precedents, and other things, the king's ministries, the old European Order general staffs, canon law, church law, rights duties and privileges of nobilities including upper clergy, law and equity distinctions, feudal rules and procedures, and other things. Was the class status of the litigant, or the tribunal, substantive or procedural?
No comments:
Post a Comment