Re DK A radio appearance comment:
"Professor
Interesting discussion. Thank you.
The author shares at least some of my views, it seems, although our library even now has no copy of this book, he likes a parliamentary structure, he sees many of the problems of the Presidency as themselves structural, he alludes to wider problems of branch coordination, and of the party system itself, implicated by his advocacy of parliamentarianism as a solution, his perception of a crying need for reform, and that the founders felt a need for reform at the founding, etc.
The colonies had wanted a weak executive in the weak federal system, and they had gotten one...
All the best"
Re: "The colonies had wanted a weak executive in the weak federal system, and they had gotten one..."
Watch Bobbitt do extraordinary backflips to argue around this most basic constitutional structural fact:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xua0r5nTu_4&t=1820s
If Pluto was thought to be a planet, and it turns out to be an asteroid, then that is a flaw in one's past astronomical thought. You can roll in mud, but Pluto then turns out to be an asteroid.
Let's just say, on the other hand, that I see no better reason to deny the validity of Brown because Plessy had a longer run.
It does not remain to appear that Congress will be an enlightened partner....
No comments:
Post a Comment