What has happened, especially in the US, is that appeals to a distinct civilizational ideal, even frankly a lost one, or civilizational political institutions, or nationalistic identifications, based in part on an overarching civilizational membership, and other related or even distinct political positions, are immediately converted, reduced, obfuscated, and labeled, here, as all different species of an underlying racism.
If you're a nationalist, well then you must be a fascist. If you're a fascist, well then of course you must be a racist. Similarly for Western Civilizationalists, Atlanticists, so called populists, anarchists, even civil libertarians, etc.
If you're a nationalist, well then you must be a fascist. If you're a fascist, well then of course you must be a racist. Similarly for Western Civilizationalists, Atlanticists, so called populists, anarchists, even civil libertarians, etc.
Imperialism is sometimes thrown in, but it is a little hard to accuse Americans, generally, of being imperialists as such, racist or not, in the old sense, although there may actually be some imperialist racist Americans here. Yet, imperialists generally are of course as a group tarred with the brush of racism, and have been for centuries now.
Nowadays they, most Americans, have all been brainwashed by ideological methods long in place to classify everyone here as either a good globalist or a bad racist, under the liberal international economic order.
They break this down further into either good liberal or conservative anti racist globalists; or as bad, racist, anti globalists, whether they are actually merely nationalists, populists, isolationists, anarchists, civil libertarians, civilizationalist, whatever, or even actually correctly as a true and strictly speaking, say, white racialists.
There are, of course, many so called good globalists, of all kinds, who actually harbor racialist or other preferences mentioned above of one kind or another, but their overarching moniker of good globalism frees them of this hidden taint, unless somehow their true views of one stripe or another, not necessarily even racist views technically, are found out.
There are also many non globalists who have had their particular non globalist views called merely racist by globalists for so long that they now believe that their views, whichever they might happen actually to be, must be, after all, in fact mainly racist. Sort of a self fulfilling classification. Like calling someone a nigger for so long, he really knows he's a nigger now and calls himself one.
There are also many non globalists who have had their particular non globalist views called merely racist by globalists for so long that they now believe that their views, whichever they might happen actually to be, must be, after all, in fact mainly racist. Sort of a self fulfilling classification. Like calling someone a nigger for so long, he really knows he's a nigger now and calls himself one.
No comments:
Post a Comment