WHAT PUTS A POLITICIAN STRUCTURALLY INTO A POSITION OF BEING CONSIDERED TO HAVE DOUBLE CROSSED A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR?

I can think of no better place, for starting this topic, than, say, Bailyn's Ideological Origins, the chapter called "Transformation".

Cf. also, Bobbitt, Shield, p. 238 "Politics And Representation".

I just yank references like this outta my ass, because perhaps I have A Taste For Chaos.