Whom do you believe, Huntington, or Brooks?
Anyone who reads this blog knows which side I come down on.
Brooks claims that nationalism is contrary to Huntington's theses.
Nationalism is also contrary to Brooks' kind of multicultural cross civilizational, globalist (non)-states, call them market states, which Brooks lionizes.
Call nationalism the clash of civilizations' 'double whammy'.
Really, what can one properly say about Huntington's arguments on Brooks' editorial page, given its very limited scope and purposes?
What else, really, would the average American be entitled to, comprehend, or deserve, at this point, other than a short, incorrect, misleading critique, from Brooks, or for that matter from anyone else, in this format?
Term search various terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment