One inference that Whig liberal Genome researchers appear to overreach to draw is that not only did modern humans, by 50k years ago, evolve into more rational creatures than their more instinctual and emotional hominid relatives, but that because of that difference, they therefore became more moral than them around the same time.
The further inference is, then, that modern West Eurasians who later invaded other modern humans in North India around 5,000 years ago behaved badly on their own mutual moral principles in taking ANI women as concubines and enslaving or killing and eating ANI males.
The analogies to David Kaiser's distinctions between North and South white populations are obvious: the North was a more advanced version of the human species than the South, and was better able to understand, rationally as well as morally, the ethical distinctions between freedom and slavery than Southern whites had been able to do, during centuries of virtually genetic darkness in the South. The Southerners were rather like Neanderthals confronting modern humans!
The analogies to David Kaiser's distinctions between North and South white populations are obvious: the North was a more advanced version of the human species than the South, and was better able to understand, rationally as well as morally, the ethical distinctions between freedom and slavery than Southern whites had been able to do, during centuries of virtually genetic darkness in the South. The Southerners were rather like Neanderthals confronting modern humans!
No comments:
Post a Comment