'He suggested one way to target an individual was to "offer them a deal that's too good to be true and make sure that's video recorded".'
If I had a particularly bad criminal case, say three officers testifying to the exact same incriminating thing, I would turn it on them....
I would say that the state's case was just a little too good to be true (which, of course, was usually true, so I was actually telling the truth, believe it or not).
But American politicians readily fall for this kind of bait, whether from the media, or from a rival party sting.
Think of analogies to Rumpole, The Learned Friends, Dirty Dickerson, and the fingerprint on the gelegnite supposedly found at the scene of the armed robbery, a safe blower leaving his fingerprint...just a little too good to be true.
They got Dirty Dickerson, who had testified to something too good to be true (perjury), the same way Cambridge Analytica proposed to get rival politicians, by tape recording them while offering them the same dish.
Think of analogies to Rumpole, The Learned Friends, Dirty Dickerson, and the fingerprint on the gelegnite supposedly found at the scene of the armed robbery, a safe blower leaving his fingerprint...just a little too good to be true.
They got Dirty Dickerson, who had testified to something too good to be true (perjury), the same way Cambridge Analytica proposed to get rival politicians, by tape recording them while offering them the same dish.
No comments:
Post a Comment