RE THE REVOLT OF THE WEAK BROOKS' DREW PEARSON AND HUNTINGTON FALLACIES

He also has numerous other fallacies.

Is he talking about the Western leaders, as the weak, or the third world, and others, at or below the sustenance level?

Hard to say. He sounds like world leaders are also the weak powerless ones.

He knows what he is saying, and he knows the score.

Another example of the Drew Pearson fallacy, by Brooks.

IF YOU LOOK AT HIS NOTION OF CIVILIZATION, THE ONLY ONE SHOWING. along traditional notions, IS THAT OF THE WEST. 
Brooks refers to civilization in the singular.

Alternatively, he refers, of course, to the globalist civilization, the pet of the NYT.

I vote he really means a globalist, rather than a Western, one.

Brooks is a victim of what one might call the Huntington Fallacy, that is, he has no real notion of what civilizations are really like. 

Whether it's western civ, or globalist civ, it's still the Huntington Fallacy.

Let's show Brooks what civilizations (plural) really look like on a map, shall we?